On March 17, Tori Sachs, the Executive Director of the Michigan Freedom Fund, wrote an opinion piece that appeared in the Detroit News, entitled, Whitmer’s talk is cheap, but gas has never been more expensive.
The Michigan Freedom Fund is a GOP front group, with a sole purpose of attacking the Democratic Party in Michigan. The Michigan Freedom Fund used to be run by the long-time DeVos operative Greg McNeily. Tori Sachs has only been with the Michigan Freedom fund for the past, although she has been a Republican operative for some time now.
Sachs previously served as the executive director of Michigan Rising Action. Michigan Rising Action’s mission statement is as follows:
Michigan Rising Action is focused on holding liberal groups and their special interest networks accountable and advancing conservative principles. We’re fighting for limited government, lowering taxes, fighting government over-regulation that stifles freedom, free enterprise, strong national security, and shaping the public policy debate in Michigan. We hold liberal groups and their special interest networks accountable, fact-checking left-wing politicians whose policies would push the state in the wrong direction, and ensuring citizens have the most accurate, up-to-date information to drive a balanced policy conversation.
In addition to Sachs’ work with Michigan Rising Action, she got some attention because of her work with Better Future Michigan, a Political Action Committee that spent millions in the 2020 Election to purchase ad time to attack Senator Gary Peters, in his race against GOP candidate John James. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, during the 2019-2020 election cycle, Better Future Michigan spent a little over $11 million in political ads attacking Democrats and only $465,000 on ads promoting Republicans.
As is evidenced by her work with these two GOP front groups, you can see why the Michigan Freedom Fund would hire her to continue attacking the Democrats, often with cheap shots or unsubstantiated claims.
This brings us to the opinion piece that that the Michigan Freedom Fund’s ED, Tori Sachs, wrote for the Detroit News. Sachs would have us believe that gas prices in Michigan are the fault of Gov. Whitmer, both because of her tax policy and because of her support of the lawsuit put forth by Attorney General Nessel against the Enbridge Line 5.
Gov. Whitmer’s veto of the GOP proposed tax bill is a weak argument, especially since it would not have primarily benefited low income and other working class families, but it would have benefited the wealthy and the business class in Michigan.
As for the Line 5 argument, there are a whole lot more contradictions. First, while Gov. Whitmer supports the AG lawsuit to shut down the existing Line 5, the Enbridge-owned Line 5 is still in operation and pumping 540,000 barrels of oil per day. If the Governor had effectively shut down Line 5, then maybe that argument might have been reasonable. Secondly, Tori Sachs fails to acknowledge the real reasons that gas prices have gone up, which is primarily about price gauging from big oil. The Russian invasion has nothing to do with it. Third, the Michigan Freedom Fund ED fails to acknowledge the fact that the federal government provides massive subsidies to the oil & gas industry and that both Republican and Democratic politicians received huge campaign contributions over the years, as we pointed out in a recent article. These facts completely demolish the notion that Gov. Whitmer is to blame for current gas prices.
Lastly, the opinion piece by Tori Sachs also cites a study by the Consumer Energy Alliance, which claims, “Michigan families could pay up to $2.2 billion more each year for their gas and diesel” if Line 5 is shut down. Despite seeking to appeal to consumers with its name, the Consumer Energy Alliance is a front group for the energy industry. https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Consumer_Energy_Alliance Besides the analysis provided by Source Watch on this group, just look at their Board of Directors and members are represented by, making it clear that they represent the energy industry and financial interest groups.
In the closing paragraph of the opinion piece from the Michigan Freedom Fund ED, it states:
Voters aren’t dumb, motorists aren’t rich, and the state’s gas and energy policy matters. Stop the war against Line 5. Cut the income tax. Give motorists the break they need.
I mostly agree with the first sentence, but second sentence is not only ridiculous, it is misleading.
Ultimately, such commentary from the Michigan Freedom Fund is consist with their whole history, exposing them as partisan hacks, but also shills for systems of power and oppression in Michigan. Shut down Line 5, stop subsidizing Big Oil and stop voting for candidates who take money from the oil & gas industry.
Over the years, GRIID has been monitoring the Grand Rapids-based Far Right Think Tank, known as the Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.
The Acton Institute’s main objective is to demonstrate that Capitalism and Christianity are good bedfellows, but they have also written about and invited speakers & writers from other groups that take a hardline stance against the Black Freedom Struggle, Reproductive Justice, Public Education, and LGBTQ issues.
On Monday, March 21st, on the Acton Institute’s podcast known as Acton Unwind, the far right think tank decided to present their views surrounding the so-called controversy involving collegiate swimmer Lia Thomas. The title of the show provides listeners with a clear indication of where the think tank stands on the matter, “Lia Thomas and the nature of the human person.”
The Acton host invited two other Acton writers, Samuel Gregg and Dan Hugger, to discuss what they referred to as a “more high-minded conversation.” The three cis-gendered men spent about 20 minutes using comments like; “We lived in a confused society,” “how do we define what a human being really is,” “the Lia Thomas controversy,” and “Physicality and anthropology.” One of the show’s guest even cited Rene Descartes, “I think therefore I am,” as a means of justifying their position.
The three cis-gendered white men also perpetuated some falsehoods, like what Lia Thomas’s ranking was when they swam on the men’s team and now on the women’s team.
One of the guest on the Acton podcast then said it was hard to have these conversations because people will shut you down. If by shutting you down means, calling people out for being transphobic, then yeah, it is hard to have “these kind of conversations.” If someone was clearly making anti-Semitic statements or anti-Black statements, it is important for them to be called out on it, so why shouldn’t it be any different when people are making anti-trans statements.
In this same argument about it being “hard to have these discussions,” the Acton podcast guest then refers to the book, When Harry became Sally, by Ryan Anderson. The cis-gendered man says the book, “presents a very careful philosophical argument, that is done with sensitivity.” The book referenced is both transphobic and homophobic, and was so offensive that even the online sales behemoth Amazon removed it from their listing of books.
There was one comment that I tended to agree with, coming from one of the podcast participants. The comment was referencing the fact that people who identify as liberal or progressive, who claim to the an ally of the trans community, feel that something doesn’t seem right about trans athletes. Just based on recent social media posts, this seems to be the case, but for this writer it says more about the so-called ally community and how many of us have internalized transphobia.
Like all social justice issues, those of us who carry a great deal of privilege in this society, need to do the work to better understand what is at issue here. It is not the job of the trans community or trans athletes to educate us. We need to do that work ourselves. Here are a few resources that I have found useful in my own education.
https://transgenderlawcenter.org/
https://www.thenation.com/article/society/brittney-griner-lia-thomas/
https://www.outsports.com/trans/2022/1/6/22867761/lia-thomas-penn-swimming-trans-truth-myth
https://www.aclu.org/news/lgbtq-rights/four-myths-about-trans-athletes-debunked/
The Acton Institute’s anti-LGBTQ ideology is not surprising. In 2019, they invited Kate Anderson, who serves as legal counsel for Alliance Defending Freedom, to write an article about why they were defending Catholic Charities of West Michigan in their legal battle to defend their right to deny same sex couples the right to adopt in Michigan. We also reported in that Alliance Defending Freedom was on the Southern Poverty Law Center’s hate map, listing these claims:
- Supported the recriminalization of homosexuality in the U.S. and criminalization abroad
- Defended state-sanctioned sterilization of trans people abroad
- Linked homosexuality to pedophilia
- Claims that a “homosexual agenda” will destroy Christianity and society
No matter how “high minded” the Acton Institute wants to claim they are, the reality is that the have long demonstrated an anti-LGBTQ ideology. This ideology not only does actual harm against the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Queer community, it is well funded and influences people around the world. Maybe their Acton University event, from June 20 – 24th at the DeVos Convention Center, would be a great opportunity to publicly call them out on their transphobia and other oppressive beliefs.
On Monday, MLive posted a story with the following headline, Meijer donates $1M to Hispanic chambers of commerce. In the first sentence, this donation from Meijer is clarified, saying: “Meijer is donating $1 million to 17 Hispanic chambers of commerce across the Midwest.”
Before we begin discussing the content of this MLive article, it is worth noting that MLive essentially just reposted a version of the Meijer Media Release. Not only is this another example of lazy journalism, it demonstrates a complete lack of inquiry on the part of the MLive reporter. Here are a list of questions that the MLive reporter could have asked, in order to explore the implications of the Meijer donation to various Hispanic Chambers of Commerce.
First, it would be important for the public to have a more robust response to the following statement from the Meijer Corporation, when they said:
“Our Diversity & Inclusion journey focuses not just on our own team members, customers and business partners, but on our communities at large. We look forward to seeing how the Hispanic Chambers use our gift to create intergenerational wealth and opportunity for people in our communities.”
The corporate use of the terms Diversity & Inclusion is intentionally vague, since it doesn’t really mean anything, although it does conjure certain sensibilities. Meijer claims that Diversity & Inclusion is for their team members, customers and business partners. Ok, so let’s inquire as to how true that is in meaningful terms. How many members of the Meijer Corporation are Latino/a, including executive staff, administrative staff, management and employees? Of the several dozen members of the Executive Team, maybe 2 are BIPOC. There is no way to know how many workers are BIPOC, nor of their customers.
The statement from Meijer then says they want to see how the various Hispanic Chambers “create intergenerational wealth.” Here we assume that this means intergenerational wealth of the Hispanic/Latino/a community, since that is the demographic that these Chambers of Commerce serve. In concrete economic terms, if you divide $1 million by 17, that comes out to $58,824. Therefore, each of the 17 Hispanic Chambers of Commerce will have $58,824 to use to create intergenerational wealth. This is not really a large sum of money in the business world, but lets’ assume this money would be used for business startups. If you gave 6 Latino/a members of the community $10,000 each as a start up, that would use up all of the money, which in the big picture, isn’t much. Plus, you have to factor into this dynamic, that not everyone will be successful.
A second question that could be asked would be how much do the Latino/a employees of Meijer make? Most Meijer employees make just above minimum wage in Michigan, which makes it impossible for those individuals and families to create intergenerational wealth.
Third, since Meijer included business partners and the community at large in their list of people to have an opportunity to create intergenerational wealth, a good journalist would inquire if the farms pay workers, most of which are Latino/a, a livable wage? Michigan has one of the largest migrant worker populations in the US, but their wages are low, and are often based on piece-work. Besides wait staff, migrant farm workers are not eligible to receive a guaranteed minimum wage, so farmers and agribusinesses can pay them whatever they want. Again, a good journalist would ask, how does the low wages of migrant workers create intergenerational wealth?
A fourth, and final question, could be to inquire as to the $1 million donation from Meijer, in relation to the wealth of the Meijer family. Based on the most recent data from Forbes list of Billionaires, Hank and Doug Meijer are worth $16.224 Billion. $1 million is .006% of $16.224 Billion. Comparatively, if someone who makes $50,000 donates .006% of the income, that comes out to $3. Therefore, a $1 Million donation from Meijer to create generational wealth is like you and I donating $3.
Since the Spring of 2018, Movimiento Cosecha, the immigrant-led movement for immigrant justice, has been demanding that the Michigan Legislature make it legal for undocumented immigrants to be be apply to apply for a driver’s license.
During the past 4 years, Movimiento Cosecha has marched, held vigils, engaged in direct action, protested outside of Secretary of State offices, organized a 75 mile pilgrimage, protested outside the homes of various state legislators and demanded that local city councils endorse their campaign to win driver’s licenses for all.
In October of 2019, several state legislators introduced legislation that would allow for undocumented immigrants to obtain a driver’s license in Michigan. However, since then there has been little movement on the legislation, despite the ongoing pressure coming from the immigrant justice movement. There was finally a public hearing scheduled for the issue of driver’s licenses in September of 2021, but the Michigan House Speaker intervened at the last second and canceled the scheduled hearing.
Just last month, Movimiento Cosecha Michigan once again went to the State Capital to protest the fact that there has yet to be a public hearing on driver’s licenses, even though it has been 2 and a half years since the legislation has been introduced.
Yesterday, I received an e-mail from Rep. Padma Kuppa, who was one of the state legislators that introduced the legislation. Here is what she said:
Thank you so much for taking the time to contact my office to voice your support for the Drive SAFE legislation: House Bills 4835 and 4836, and Senate Bills 433 and 434! I was proud to introduce HB 4835 this term to help support Michiganders and our economy.
As you know, these bills would restore the right of Michigan residents to obtain a driver’s license or state identification card regardless of their ability to produce documents affirming their legal residency. Because of advocacy like yours, there has been a renewed interest in the Drive SAFE legislation, and I was recently approached by several media outlets to discuss these bills and had an opportunity to underscore the positive impact they would have on our state, especially for those who are unable to drive safely and legally due to no fault of their own. These interviews are incredibly valuable in expanding the reach of our message.
Since 2008, our current laws have prevented immigrants and others from obtaining a driver’s license or state ID, including seniors and those in foster care who have lost documents over the years, those born on military bases, etc. As we all know how important it is to have mobile autonomy in today’s society, enacting the Drive SAFE legislation will be key to removing significant everyday barriers for Michigan residents, which would allow them to better support themselves and our economy, and in turn this would help alleviate numerous statewide setbacks such as the current worker shortage.
I also recently introduced a resolution, HR 248, to urge the federal government to quickly address the backlog in employment-based green cards, including, but not limited to, enacting H.R. 3648 of 2021, also known as the EAGLE Act. The resolution has gained bipartisan support, but we are still facing an uphill battle for its passage. Would you be interested in meeting with me and other advocates for an update on these policies and to answer any questions that you may have?
Please let me know and, once again, thank you for your advocacy. I am honored to be a voice for Michigan residents such as yourself. If you wish to monitor any Michigan legislation, you may do so at www.legislature.mi.gov. Please refer to my website (kuppa.housedems.com) or social media platforms (@MIRepPadmaKuppa on Facebook and @PadmaKuppaMI41 on Twitter) regarding our upcoming events. I also encourage you to sign up for email updates at housedems.com/padma-kuppa/enews-signup/. If you have any other concerns or questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. We are here to serve and provide the most up-to-date information possible, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic.
At one level, the e-mail was an acknowledgment of the work that has been done at the grassroots level. However, I don’t need a rundown of all of the proposed legislation the Rep. Kuppa has introduced on this matter. What immigrants need is for elected officials to do a whole lot more to get this legislation passed, such as:
- Hold a Press Conference to demand a Public Hearing on Driver’s Licenses for All.
- Engage in a disruptive action at the State Legislature, which could include civil disobedience to force the issue.
- Elected officials need to actively and publicly support the demands of the immigrant justice movement, which means showing up to their events (to support), invite their constituents to show up, participate in the marches, the protests and other types of direct action.
The undocumented immigrant community lives in constant fear of arrest, detention and deportation. Those who claim to represent them, the elected officials, need to embrace the fact that winning driver’s licenses is a very urgent matter for immigrants, even a life and death matter. Introducing legislation is not enough. We need elected officials to join the movement for immigrant justice, be part of the struggle, and to take direction from the very people who are threatened daily by local, state and federal law enforcement officials. Solidarity is more than just legislation, it means developing deep relationships from those most affected and it means actively listening to their collective stories.
Over the passed several weeks, there have been a plethora of memes on social media that are intended to point out the brutal violence that the Ukrainians are facing since the Russian Invasion began. The text that goes with these memes usually goes something like this, “If prices go up at the pump….it’s temporary fallout. Think of it as the price of freedom. You aren’t sitting on a concrete floor in a train terminal holding your cat.”
Of course, for those of us who are not currently under military occupation, we can sympathize and realize that things could be worse. One can be outraged about how the Russian invasion has caused tremendous hardship for thousands of Ukrainians, but one can also be disgusted at the fact that gas prices have gone up significantly in recent months. Gas prices going up more than a dollar per gallon in recent months, has caused significant economic hardship for millions living in the US. These are millions of people who are already experiencing poverty, exploitation, institutional racism and the impact of the pandemic, so yeah, they have every right to complain, be outraged or disgusted with the increase in gas prices. In fact, people who are using the “don’t complain about gas prices” memes, are most likely people who have class and racial privilege.
The problem with our reactionary social views in the US, often is related to the fact that millions of people have internalized Capitalist propaganda, which often pits working class people against the poor as opposed to redirecting our collective rage against the people who own and run this country. Instead of telling people who are financially struggling to not complain about gas prices, how about we direct that energy towards the oil & gas industry, along with the economic and political system that has created our collective dependency on fossil fuel reliant means of transportation. Here are a few reasons we should be pissed off at the people who own and run this country.
First, let’s be pissed off about the fact that the oil & gas companies receive massive subsidies from the US government. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimates that governments around the world had subsidized the fossil fuel industry $5.9 Trillion in 2020. That is $11 Million dollars every minute for an entire year.
Second, let’s be pissed off about the fact that the oil & gas industry has contributed $814,014,243 since 1990 to political candidates in the US. Add to that, the oil & gas industry spent $115,082,396 on lobbying the US Congress in 2021 alone, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. In other words, we have a political system in the US, where the oil & gas industry generally dictates public policy.
Third, let’s be pissed off about the fact that there was an actual conspiracy in the US to destroy most forms of mass transit, involving the auto industry. GM, Firestone and Standard Oil paid millions in fines in the 1950s for their role in buying up urban street car companies, light rail and bus companies, paving the way for a car-dependent society in most US communities. See the documentary Taken for a Ride – The U.S. History of the Assault on Public Transport in the Last Century. US residents have effectively had no real say in transit, with powerful capitalist forces determining that people are car-dependent, with whole cities being designed around car use, road construction and parking areas.
Fourth, let’s be pissed off about the fact that the federal government is unwilling to radically alter our consumption of fossil fuels, by adopting a Green New Deal. People will often say that shifting to a mass transit society would take too long, so we should just continue to promote electric cars. This is nonsense. During WWII, the US war economy shifted quickly to redirect resources to war, which included the auto industry producing military vehicles and other equipment. The current auto industry could re-tool to focus on mass transit construction, while the US government could create rail systems to connect communities, just like the Eisenhower Administration did in 1956, with the passage of the Federal-Aid Highways Act to build 41,000 miles of interstate highways across the country.
Fifth, let’s be pissed off about the fact that the US military budget is the largest in the world and that US foreign policy is driven in part by the securing of access to oil & gas resources globally. According to the National Priorities Project, Michiganders are paying $19.35 Billion in taxes that go directly to the US military budget. As a tradeoff, if this money were to stay in Michigan it could provide some of the following combined:
- $84.24 Million for Public Housing Units for 1 year
- 9.65 Million children receiving low income health care for a year
- 42.48 million households with Solar electricity for 1 year
- 261,167 Clean Energy Jobs created for 1 year
All of this is to say that if current US military spending were reduced and redirected to supporting the most vulnerable in US society, then we could reduce the harm that is being done right here.
Sixth, let’s be pissed off about the fact that the US Congress just passed $13.6 Billion military aid package for Ukraine, which will likely lead to the escalation of the fighting against Russia and further destabilize that part of the world. It took the US Congress just a few weeks to send $13.6 Billion in military aid to the Ukraine, but Flint, Michigan is still waiting for a clean water infrastructure, millions of Americans are still waiting for rent relief, and millions of Americans are food insecure on a daily basis right now!
Seventh, let’s be pissed about the fact that all six of the previous reasons to be pissed off and major contributing factors to the current Climate Crisis. The most recent ICPP report makes the following comment in their summary statement:
Today’s IPCC report is an atlas of human suffering and a damning indictment of failed climate leadership. With fact upon fact, this report reveals how people and the planet are getting clobbered by climate change. Nearly half of humanity is living in the danger zone now. Many ecosystems are at the point of no return now. Unchecked carbon pollution is forcing the world’s most vulnerable on a frogmarch to destruction now. The facts are undeniable. This abdication of leadership is criminal. The world’s biggest polluters are guilty of arson on our only home.
These are just seven reasons why people can justifiably be pissed off about the rise in gas prices in the US, although there are many more reasons we could identify. Never let people tell you what to be pissed off about, especially when you are not only excluded from any decision making in the current gas price hike, you are not the ones who are exploiting the public and making massive profits while the world burns!
After two years of the pandemic, US and Michigan Billionaires have expanded their wealth, while millions are suffering
[Editors Note: It has recently become fashionable to use the phrase, normalize calling billionaires in the US as Oligarchs. Of course, the Billionaire Class, the Capitalist Class, the Oppressor Class have always been Oligarchs. The fact that many people are not suggesting we call them Oligarchs demonstrates how much average Americans have internalized the Capitalist myth that rich people are rich because they work hard.]
It has now been two years since the world has lived under the COVID pandemic. Just over 6 million have died globally from the virus, with just under 1 million in the US.
The pandemic has also caused tremendous harm, especially for people who were already experiencing poverty, with communities of color being disproportionately affected.
However, there is one class of people who have not been negatively impacted from the pandemic, in fact, they have profited tremendously in the past two years. The group, Americans for Tax Fairness, recently posted some analysis and data on how the Billionaire Class has benefited from the global COVID pandemic.
Two years into the biggest national health crisis in recent history, U.S. billionaires’ wealth continues to soar above the misery: as of March 10, their collective wealth has shot up by $1.7 trillion, or 57%, since the pandemic emergency was proclaimed in mid-March 2020. Their total wealth reached $4.6 trillion, up from $2.95 trillion on March 18, 2020, according to the latest report from Americans for Tax Fairness (ATF) based on Forbes data. The number of U.S. billionaires increased by 15%, from 614 to 704. Data can be found in the table below and here for all billionaires, including a state-by-state breakdown.
There are two pieces of data that are particularly alarming, in terms of the growth of Billionaire wealth over the past 2 years:
- The $4.6 trillion total fortune of the nation’s 704 billionaires is one-third more than the collective $3.4 trillion net worth of the entire bottom half of American society, or some 65 million households.
- The $1.7 trillion wealth gain by billionaires over the past 24 months could fund much of the 10-year $2.2 trillion cost of the Build Back Better plan of social and environmental investments passed by the House of Representatives last fall. Billionaires could pick up much of the tab and still be just as rich as they were before COVID hit.
This kind of meaningful break down of the wealth of the Capitalist Class is important, especially if we are to make sense of the vastness of their wealth to inform and mobilize people to dismantle their wealth.
The growth of Michigan Billionaire Wealth
There are several dozen billionaires in Michigan that have seen their wealth grow exponentially during the two years of the pandemic, along with newly created Billionaires. Data can be found here for all billionaires, including a state-by-state breakdown.
Two of the more prominent Billionaires who call Michigan home are Dan Gilbert and the Meijer brothers, Doug & Hank. Gilbert is the 32nd Wealthiest Billionaire in the US, according to the most recent data. The net worth of Dan Gilbert at the beginning of the pandemic was $6.5 Billion. Two years later, Gilbert’s net worth has grown to a total of over $23 Billion, with a total growth of over $16 Billion in town years. Gilbert, is the founder of Rock Ventures and the co-founder of Quicken Loans. He also owns the NBA team known as the Cleveland Cavaliers. Gilbert moved much of his base of operations to Detroit over a decade ago, buying up lots of downtown property, contributing to the gentrification of Detroit.
Hank and Doug Meijer began the pandemic in March of 2020, with a net worth of $10.2 Billion. Today, their net worth is $16.224 Billion, which is just over a $6 billion dollar growth. Just as a frame of reference, $6.2 billion is roughly 14 times the size of the 2022 budget for the City of Grand Rapids ($546 million). Imagine how much housing, health care, education, livable wages, etc. that $6.2 billion could be spent on to actually create real equity in Kent County, where the Meijer brothers reside. This would still leave them with over $10 billion, which would be more than enough to have a grotesquely comfortable life.
The Americans for Tax Fairness document advocates the taxing of the Billionaire Class in the US, which would be an important first step. However, taxing the rich, is not enough, as we have stated before. In January of this years, I wrote:
“I support taxing the rich, but that is just one tactic to be used in a much larger strategy to dismantle Capitalism. Plus taxing the rich means that the government still gets to decide what to do with that money, which often means that it will go to support other projects that the Capitalist Class endorses and often benefits from.
So, moving beyond the tactic of taxing the rich, what would a more robust strategy to dismantle capitalism look like:
Undoing the harm of the Capitalist Class would first require that they be held accountable for the harm they have caused, both legally and economically. People are members of the Capitalist Class always exploit the real wealth creators – workers, plus they exploit the use of natural resources, while at the same time producing massive amounts of toxins, pollution, carbon and other ecological catastrophes.
Acknowledging this harm cannot just be a moral stance, but have real legal and economic consequences. Workers should be paid massive back wages, which were taken from them by members of the Capitalist Class. In addition, the richest people on the planet should pay massive fines for the ecological harm done to all of us.
Secondly, members of the Capitalist Class should be required to pay massive reparations to Black, Indigenous and other Communities of Color for discrimination, exploitation and other forms of structural racism they have perpetrated for centuries. These reparations could take the form of giving land back, monetary reparations and giving over other assets to those they have caused harm to for centuries.
Now, the existing forms of representative democracy that we have in the US, at the federal, state and local level, will never embrace such a strategy, no matter who is elected. What we need to make the dismantling of Capitalism a reality will not be easy, but then again revolutionary work never is.
On Tuesday, numerous local news agencies reported that Amway, like many of companies, was pulling out of Russia because of their invasion of Ukraine.
MLive was one of the local news agencies that reported on the Ada-based company’s decision to no longer do business in Russia. MLive also linked to the actual statement that Amway put out, which is significantly different that what most news agencies are reporting.
Here is a link to the Amway announcement, but we are also including the text here below, in case the company decides to remove their announcement.
Amway is powered by people – especially the inspiring, entrepreneurial and caring employees and Amway Business Owners (ABOs) who live our values every day across the world.
Seeing the global Amway family step forward and care for those who have left Ukraine in search of safety and shelter, and those who have stayed behind, has once again shown the heart of Amway and the strength of the bonds we share. Our team members who remain in Ukraine are also donating our healthy food and beverage products, personal care items, and dietary supplements to people in harm’s way, and to local hospitals and charities.
The reality of our business is that we have friends, colleagues and Amway Business Owners in both countries who have worked together for years in harmony with a common purpose. However, the continuing war, along with the global legal and operational environment, makes it impossible to continue business as we have been in Russia, and so we are announcing the immediate suspension of product imports and will be pausing other operations as well.
Hope – along with Freedom, Family and Reward – is one of our four Founders’ Fundamentals. We have upheld these ideals for more than 60 years, including through very challenging times in different parts of the world. It is our sincere hope that peace will prevail, and that we can return to fully supporting operations and opportunity for all who are a part of the Amway family.
What is striking about this statement, although not surprising, is that Amway makes their announcement primarily about themselves, rather than taking a principled stance to no longer do business in Russia.
First, the opening paragraph, along with the fourth paragraph centers the ideology of Amway, never saying anything about Russia and Ukraine. In the entire statement, Amway includes their own name six different times, and only names Ukraine twice and Russia once.
Second, when talking about Ukraine in the second paragraph Amway talks about how they are caring for those that left. The thousands of Ukrainian refugees are fleeing the violence brought about by Russia’s invasion and ongoing occupation. Amway then centers the fact that they are donating their own food and beverage products, making it all about them as opposed to the horrific plight of Ukrainian civilians. None of the language in that second paragraph conveys to realities nor the horror that Ukrainians are facing.
In the third paragraph, Russia is finally mentioned, but the Amway announcement doesn’t mention the invasion, nor the bombing, and nothing about the death of Ukrainians. The paragraph once again centers Amway business owners who apparently have been working in “harmony.” The statement then says:
However, the continuing war, along with the global legal and operational environment, makes it impossible to continue business as we have been in Russia, and so we are announcing the immediate suspension of product imports and will be pausing other operations as well.
In this sentence, Amway finally uses the term war, but then quickly makes it about not being able to do business there, which is why they are suspending “product imports” and “pausing other operations.” There is no mention of the international condemnation of the Russian invasion nor the position that the US government has taken.
The fourth and final paragraph yet again centers the company, even taking the opportunity to promote their founding values. Amway concludes by timidly hoping that peace will prevail, not because it will stop the bombing and the killing by the Russian army in Ukraine, but so the company can, “can return to fully supporting operations and opportunity for all who are a part of the Amway family.”
So, Amway does their best to avoid demonstrating any real solidarity with the Ukrainian people, nor do they empathize with the harsh realities that civilians are facing in Ukraine because of the Russian invasion. What Amway does do, is to constantly promote themselves and their capitalist values. In the end, the Amway corporation is not pausing operations because of human rights, they are only pausing operations because it would be an embarrassment to continue doing business in Russia. If Russia and Ukraine negotiate a peace settlement, you can bet that Amway will be back in Russia, attempting to create more little capitalists, regardless of the repressive political realities under the Putin regime.
A Brief history of Women-led Movements in Grand Rapids: Part II – The Reproductive Justice Movement
(Editor’s Note: During the month of March – Women’s History month, GRIID will highlight three Social Movements that were led by women in Grand Rapids. These three posts will be part of a chapter that will be included in the book, A People’s History of Grand Rapids.)
In Part I, we looked at the Women’s Suffrage Movement in Grand Rapids, a movement that began in the 1870s and eventually won the fight for women to vote in local elections in 1918, along with the passage of the 19th Amendment being adopted in 1920. Today, we want to take a look at the Reproductive Justice Movement in Grand Rapids.
In the history of the United States, women have rarely had body autonomy. It wasn’t until the early 1980s in the US, that all states finally overturned laws that made women who married men, the property of their husbands.
However, there is one area that women have fought for and are still fighting for, which is reproductive justice and the right to have an abortion. What is interesting about the issue of the right of a woman to have an abortion, is that it was legal until 1873, when the federal government outlawed abortion. Contraceptives were also outlawed at the same time, with the primary sector lobbying for the outlaw of abortion and contraceptives being male doctors. This meant, that like the rest of the US, in Grand Rapids women did not have the legal right to have an abortion until the US Supreme Court decision known as Roe V. Wade.
Roe V. Wade was not adopted as a legal ruling until 1973. This doesn’t mean that women were not defying the law and choosing what to do with their own bodies. For decades prior to Roe V. Wade, women were seeking out and creating their own networks and resources to practice reproductive justice. In Grand Rapids, many people are familiar with the Choice Fund that has been part of the work done by Fountain Street Church. What is less known is that the Choice Fund had begun in the mid-1960s, in a very clandestine fashion.
In an interview conducted with Dani Vilella in 2021, I discovered that women from Fountain Street Church (FSC) were going out of state to have abortions. This eventually prompted women who were connected to FSC to create the Choice Fund. In fact, the Choice Fund had remained clandestine until the early 1990s, primarily to avoid the wrath of the anti-abortion movement, particularly the religious branch of the anti-abortion movement, which was the dominant aspect in West Michigan.
The Choice Fund did not go public with the work they were doing to raise money for women wanting to have an abortion, not until the late 1980s. The Choice Fund made this decision because of the growing anti-abortion attacks against clinics that were performing abortions. The money raised by the Choice Fund would go directly to the Heritage Clinic for Women, covering the costs for those women who wanted to have an abortion.
Beginning in the late 1980s, the antiabortion attacks certainly escalated in Grand Rapids. Operation Rescue, the anti-Abortion group led by Randall Terry, came to Grand Rapids on several occasions beginning in the late 1980s. Protests and efforts to stop women from choosing to have an abortion were intense and often confrontational, as you can see from this Grand Rapids Press article above.
There are literally hundreds of churches in West Michigan that embrace an anti-abortion stance, some evangelical, some Christian Reformed, along with the Catholic Church. Many of these churches would include information about protests and other so-called Pro-Life actions happening in Grand Rapids, Lansing or in Washington, DC.
Additionally, there are thousands of religious people in West Michigan that make regular contributions to Michigan Right to Life. More importantly, there are several members of the West Michigan elite that have collectively contributed millions of dollars to anti-abortion groups and other “family-values” organization that want to keep women in a subordinate role in society, which also means they do not women to have bodily autonomy. In Russ Bellant’s book, The Religious Right in Michigan Politics, he cites the DeVos family, Peter Cook, the Prince family, the Van Andel family and the DeWitt family as major funders of the anti-abortion movement. Many of these same families continue to make significant financial contributions to anti-abortions groups like Right to Life.
The financial and ideological support for an anti-abortion stance has contributed to more serious acts of hate and violence against women and organizations that do reproductive health education or perform abortions in the greater Grand Rapids area. Besides physically blockading the entrance of clinics, many clinics and other organizational offices have been hit with graffiti or doused with butyric acid, which smells like vomit and is difficult to get rid of once it is used.
Many members of the Religious Right in West Michigan have also participated in what they refer to as 40 Days of Life actions, which are primarily about people coming to one of the clinics for 40 days in a row to pray, to protest and to often shame women who enter those clinics.
As a counter, there have been 40 Days of Choice campaigns and actions done over the years, primarily as a means of countering the anti-abortion forces. People who are committed to defending a woman’s right to have an abortion, would show up to provide support to the women coming to clinics, as well as acting as volunteer security to intervene if any of the anti-abortion folks attempted to harass, shame or do bodily harm to those entering the clinic. In 2012, I conducted an interview with someone involved in the 40 Days of Choice campaign, which you can listen to at this link.
With the election of Donald Trump in 2016, those committed to defending a woman’s right to an abortion, mobilized to go to Washington, DC to protest the inauguration in early 2017. The overly anti-feminist and anti-abortion rhetoric coming from the Trump administration also reinvigorated the Reproductive Justice Movement to provide security and accompaniment at local clinics in Grand Rapids. A new wave of young people began showing up and working with the clinic to provide support to women and to keep anti-abortion protestors at a distance.
In May of 2020, there were two anti-abortion protesters arrested at the Heritage Clinic in Grand Rapids. I interviewed someone who worked there at the time, but chose to remain anonymous, for obvious reasons. Some of those involved in the protest were with the group Red Rose Rescue. Here is what the clinic employee shared with me about what happened:
On the day of their protest, they showed up in a large group, gathering outside of the clinic. When patients exited their vehicles, they would either shout loudly at the patients or would directly approach them. They were verbally aggressive and their voices were elevated (we could hear them screaming from inside the clinic). One particular protestor, a woman named Caroline Davis, was seen and heard screaming “Repent your sins”, “You’re going to regret this every day”, and more to patients. Many members of the group entered the building in the stairwell in an attempt to gain access to inside the clinic, but due to the safety and privacy measures we always have in place, in addition to the diligence of precautionary measures our staff took, they were not successful with entering.
Patients came into the clinic visibly shook up and unhappy. Patients disclosed to us that protestors had approached their cars and physically banged on their car windows. One protestor held open the door to the clinic for a patient and told her to “have a nice day” (in a way that felt insincere and manipulative to the patient). Another patient came to her appointment in a vehicle with a business logo on the side, and a protestor called that business to inform them of where they were, violating their privacy.
Towards the end of the interview, I asked the clinic employee what some of the most important aspects of reproductive rights are. What they shared was deeply moving ton this writer, so I will end with their comment:
Many times, people hear “reproductive justice” and think that it is solely a pro-choice vs. anti-choice issue. It is so much more than that, though: It is ensuring that people who want to have and raise children have the adequate means to do so, and should be able to build a family on their own terms. They should be financially prepared with a living wage, paid family leave, and unbiased employers. We need social structures that allow for anyone regardless of background to receive proper pregnancy and childbirth care. There should be easy access to free or affordable contraceptives, STD/STI/HIV testing, and safe sexual health measures, such as condoms or other birth control, PrEP medication, etc. Equal access to abortion care, regardless of reason. Comprehensive sex education in public and private schools. Freedom from sexual and domestic violence. Supporting LGBTQ parents, teen parents, birth parents, and adoptive parents. Other issues that are often overlooked or not considered to be – but are 100% interrelated with reproductive justice –include food security and access to clean water; unwavering support of gender and sexual identity/presentation; immigration justice; environmental justice; disability justice; indigenous rights; and more. We must build and sustain safe communities for EVERYONE.
On Thursday, March 24th, workers at the Starbucks on Burton and Rosemont SE in Grand Rapids, are asking for ally support in their attempt to form a union.
There have been 6 newly formed unions at Starbucks across the country, with another 120 locations in the process of fighting for a union.
Those fighting to make the Burton & Rosemont Starbucks a unionized workplace are asking the following:
- Order your coffee with one of these phrases, plus your name: Union Yes, Union Strong or Solidarity
- Sign the letter at the Starbucks to show your support
- Spread the word in the GR community
Each of these ways of showing support are easy and risk free. However, if it means the workers at this Starbucks location will be able to form a union, then we should all finds ways to participate. In addition, if this Starbucks location forms a union, then it will be easier for workers at every Starbucks location where workers want the right to collectively bargain!
A brief history of Starbucks unionizing efforts in Grand Rapids
In June of 2008, the indy media blog Media Mouse posted a story about a Starbucks barista who was fired for attempting to organize a union:
Starbucks terminated a barista active in the IWW Starbucks Workers Union today as part of its ongoing effort to combat a growing movement of employees pushing for a living wage and secure work hours. The barista, Cole Dorsey, was fired after two years of service while he was coordinating a union recruitment drive at Starbucks stores in Grand Rapids. Starbucks’ pretext for the illegal anti-union firing was that Dorsey was guilty of some months-old attendance infractions.
“Today I joined the growing number of baristas that Starbucks has fired in its relentless union-busting campaign,” said Cole Dorsey. “Starbucks’ disrespect for the right to join a union is appalling and absolutely will not stop our efforts to have a voice at work.”
The firing comes as a National Labor Relations Board judge is set to rule after a lengthy trial on the retaliatory terminations of three New York City baristas. Even before the firing, the NLRB was investigating whether Starbucks violated a settlement agreement entered into in Grand Rapids over anti-union discrimination. In 2006, Starbucks was forced to re hire two union baristas who had been unlawfully fired for union activity. This latest firing in Grand Rapids signals that reinstalled CEO Howard Schultz will not modify the company’s practice of terminating outspoken union baristas to intimidate workers from joining up.
One month after IWW labor organizer Cole Dorsey was fired from Starbucks, the local IWW chapter organized a protest at a Starbucks location on 28th Street and the E. Beltline. The IWW sent out the following message:
“Union members and social activists are gearing up for what may be the largest, global coordinated action against Starbucks ever. Protesters will decry what they see as an epidemic of anti-union terminations by the world’s largest coffee chain. Starbucks and its CEO Howard Schultz have exhibited a pattern of firing outspoken union baristas ever since the advent of the IWW Starbucks Workers Union in 2004 and are demonstrating the same practice against the CNT union in Spain. On July 5th people around the world will show Starbucks that we, baristas along with our supporters, will have a voice and Starbucks discrimination and repression of our efforts will not go un-checked”, said Cole Dorsey.
In November of 2008, Starbucks was taken to court by the IWW worker for being fired. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) provided a lawyer to fight for the fired Starbucks employee, while Starbucks hired the corporate law firm of Varnum, Riddering, Schmidt and Howlett.
Then in July of 2009, while awaiting a ruling on the case. The Grand Rapids Chapter of the IWW, organized another demonstration outside of the Starbucks in East Grand Rapids on Wealthy St. The video below includes comments from IWW organizers Cole Dorsey and Erik Foreman, a short march through East Grand Rapids and police who were called to harass those protesting.
Photo credit: Michael Johnston
The same people who created the Housing Next fund in West MI, are the same people who oppose paying workers enough to afford housing
On March 3rd, the Grand Rapids Chamber of Commerce made the following announcement:
Through the leadership and contributions of Haworth and both the Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area and the Grand Haven Area Community Foundation, each foundation made their largest and longest commitment of funding to establish Housing Next 4 years ago. Their goal was to create workforce housing for individuals and families employed in Ottawa County who were unable to afford to live there. Housing Next has already supported the approval of thousands of new multi-family rental units and for-sale homes in Ottawa County through the revision and modernization of 6 local zoning codes with the goal of reducing regulatory barriers and increasing diversity of housing product in the market, partnering with 4 communities on the contribution of public land for affordable/attainable and market-rate housing, collaborating with 21 different developers (for-profit & non-profit) to leverage more than 3,900 new housing starts and 30 new developments across the County, managing the Ottawa and Kent Housing Needs Assessments, and assisting in the creation of the Grand Rapids Affordable Housing Fund.
While this announcement might be viewed by some as good news, it is ultimately a false solution, wrought with contradiction.
The Grand Rapids Chamber of Commerce, along with several other local chambers, furniture giant Haworth, several banks, the Windquest Group and the DeVos Family Foundation are hoping that we view this announcement with a great victory against the current housing crisis. It isn’t.
The language from the announcement is instructive, in that it states that the goal, “was to create workforce housing for individuals and families employed in Ottawa County who were unable to afford to live there.” Now, any reasonable person would ask themselves why can’t workers afford to live in the communities that they work in? The simple answer is because these individuals and families don’t make enough to afford the cost of housing in the communities that they work in.
The solution being offered by the numerous area Chambers of Commerce, is to create a fund that comes from the business community, foundations and local banks, which would allow these individuals and families to afford the cost of housing in the communities where they work. However, wouldn’t it make a whole lot more sense to have all of the companies in West Michigan make a commitment to paying people a livable wage, which would allow them to afford the cost of housing in this area?
While the idea of paying people a livable wage makes complete sense, the fact that most companies in this area don’t pay a livable wage, gets to the heart of my argument. The fact of the matter is that the Grand Rapids Chamber of Commerce and most of the partner groups with Housing Next have actively opposed an increase in the minimum wage for decades, let alone any talk of a livable wage. In addition to opposing an increase in the minimum wage or actually paying a livable wage, the Chamber of Commerce has a long history of being against a just maternity leave, union organizing, and they supported Michigan becoming a Right to Work state. Here are some other more recent stances taken by the Chamber of Commerce:
- Property tax deferment for businesses, which Whitmer has vetoed twice
- Regulatory flexibility
- A possible end to licensing fees
- Eliminate or reduce business unemployment fees
- Improve work research requirements to make people take jobs that don’t pay well
- Education testing to make sure that students are work ready. In other words, the GR Chamber sees education as talent production
- Creating more childcare options to get people back into the workforce and improve productivity
- Criminal Justice reform for the GR Chamber is about getting more formerly incarcerated people into the workforce, which the Chamber also sees as a Talent issue
- Continuation of the Going Pro Program, which transfers public money to private businesses for training purposes
In 2008, the Grand Rapids Chamber of Commerce created the West Michigan Policy Forum, which has since become an independent entity. The West Michigan Policy Forum was created to actively influence public policy at the state level, policies that would assist or hinder the business community.
Matt Haworth, Chairman of Haworth Inc., was quoted in the March 3rd announcement saying, “My decision to support this project was because of its strong alignment with our values- values that extend beyond our business to the communities and people we rely on including: embracing community learning, market-based solutions, leading with design, creating value, and working to make the world a better place.” Haworth also sits of the Board of Directors of the West Michigan Policy Forum and is a major contributor to political candidates which support the kind of public policies that benefit members of the business class, at the expense of everyone else.
In fact, if you look those who sit on the board of the West Michigan Policy Forum and the community partners of the Housing Next project you see a great deal of overlap.
The bottom line is that the Housing Next project is a false solution, since it involves the very same organizations, businesses and individuals that have done everything in their power to promote wealth creation for the business class, while creating a vast array of obstacles for everyone else who lives in West Michigan and cannot afford the cost of housing. Creating a housing fund made from money that, in essence, has been withheld from the wages of workers, should never been seen as a solution, but rather as a public relations stunt to make us all think these people and these businesses give a shit about the rest of us.
Grand Rapids Institute for Information Democracy 