Let’s not miss another opportunity to defeat what the rich bastards in Kent County want to do in the future
On Monday, MLive posted an article entitled, Smaller venues want a cut of tax approved for Grand Rapids amphitheater, soccer stadium.
The article cites a few of the smaller venue owners, which is great, but provides more comment from Kent County Commissioners. I find it puzzling that the Kent County Commissioners were given so much space to talk about this matter, event though they are the same body that approved the August 6th ballot initiative to expand from 5% to 8% of the hotel tax in the first place. It is also somewhat disingenuous for these commissioners to sound like they care about the viability of smaller venues, when they knew very well that the Grand Action 2.0 proposed ballot initiative would not benefit the smaller music venues.
I also saw a response on social media to the MLive article linked above, where someone asks why people supported the hotel tax increase in the first place. Well, the August 6th ballot initiative did not get overwhelming approval. According to the Kent County Clerk’s office, 65,909 people voted in favor, but 56,976 voted against the hotel tax increase. This is pretty amazing, especially when you consider that the Destination Kent Committee had raised nearly a half a million dollars in just a few short months, which allowed them to spend hundreds of thousands on radio ads, online ads and mailers.
Imagine if there would have been a organized campaign to oppose the hotel tax increase or a campaign to change the language of it to allow for smaller venues to benefit. Imagine if the those who are owners of the smaller venues cited in the MLive article – Four Star Theater, the Pyramid Scheme or the Intersection – were organized with the community, what could have collectively been done to defeat the Grand Action 2.0 ballot initiative?
I have heard numerous people say that in the future, we cannot let groups like Grand Action 2.0 and their friends at the GR Chamber of Commerce create ballot initiatives or manipulate local politicians into using millions in public dollars to finance development projects that will simply expand the wealth of those who are already millionaires and billionaires in this area. In fact, I think we should start organizing now to see how many people want to be ready to defeat any future development projects that transfers more wealth to those who think they run this community. Who wants in on this?
Book signing this Friday for Radical Grand Rapids: Places, dates, actions and people
Join me this Friday, September 6th, between 5pm and 8pm, at the 28th Street location of Schuler Books, where I will be signing copies of my latest book, Radical Grand Rapids: Places, dates, actions and people.
This new book is a companion to the book I wrote last year, A People’s History of Grand Rapids. The new book consists of 40 short chapters that focus on: 1) significant places in Grand Rapids where a specific event took place; 2) dates of important events and various campaigns for social justice in Grand Rapids; 3) actions, which cover over a 100 year period and were part of larger social movement work; and 4) specific people in Grand Rapids history that I believe need to be honored, celebrated or shown contempt.
This past week, while at a conference, I had the opportunity to hear the amazing Ruth Wilson Gilmore speak. I say this, because I cite her in the introduction to Radical Grand Rapids: Places, dates, actions and people.
“In her book, Abolition Geography: Essays Towards Liberation, Ruth Wilson Gilmore says, “Abolition geography starts from the homely premise that freedom is a place.” Building on Wilson’s notion of abolition geographies, we can then understand the importance of mapping the political, social, and economic terrain of Grand Rapids. Therefore, I am arguing that freedom and liberation can be a place, but it can also be about dates, actions, and people.
I am only including forty places, dates, actions and people in this short book, since many more stories of the powerful and radically imaginative actions that people have taken in Grand Rapids over the past two centuries are explored in my book, A People’s History of Grand Rapids. I want show people, especially young people, that when we take radical actions, we open spaces for people, and we allow them to radically imagine that another world is possible.”
Please come and join me, pick up a copy of my book, tell me some stories or just give me a hard time. You can check out the Facebook event page that Schuler Books created for the book signing. Hope to see you there!
Day Three – Socialism Conference: Immigration Abolition, Border Imperialism, Indigenous resistance and anti-carceral movement work
Silky Shah (Unbuild Walls: Why Immigrant Justice Needs Abolition) began the conversation by talking about how far the Democrats have moved to the right on immigration and carceral responses to immigration. This ultimately means that Republicans just continue to move even further to the right of whatever the Democrats are proposing, leaving immigrants to suffer under both parties.
Shah then talked about how Republican Governors have been busing immigrants to the North, which may not have been a huge problem decades ago, but now that social services have been radically defunded, cities line New York no longer have capacity to deal with an influx of immigrants. This has led the Democrats to focus even more on draconian border policies. Thus, moving to the right is the logic for winning the 2024 election for the Democrats.
She then says, “the Biden/Harris policy for those who have been here for 10 years or more and are married to a US citizen is just window dressing and crumbs. Neither of these things promote immigration justice.”
Harsha Walia (Border and Rule: Global Migration, Capitalism, and the Rise of Racist Nationalism) began by talking about how Far Right border policies have been a bipartisan approach in the US, but is also happening around the globe. Walia refers to this trend as both a fascist border policy and nationalist xenophobia. “What we are seeing is that politicians and the commercial media are talking about border insecurity, when they fail to talk about the actual violence being done to immigrants at the border.”
Another important point that Walia talked about was the fact that we don’t talk about immigration outside of the US/Mexican border. In fact, Mexico is currently deporting more Central Americans than the US, but they are doing so at the behest of the US. This dynamic is conveniently left out of the political and media narrative.
Then there is the issue of border outsourcing, when states, like Australia, are paying the private sector to create and run detention centers, often off the mainland, as a way of hiding it and distancing the state from the harm. Another aspect of global border imperialism is that we don’t talk about the colonial history or the current imperialist dynamic, which are the very roots of why so many people are fleeing their countries of origins. We cannot “fix” the immigration issue if we don’t come to terms with how US foreign policy is displacing people and has created the “immigration crisis.” Walia says that the real crisis is imperial policies.
Walia end her opening comments by saying, “To undo and dismantle border imperialism, is to dismantle racial capitalism.”
Silky then talked more about the evolution of US immigration policy, especially from the Obama years, which were very draconian. She discussed how the immigrant (led) justice movement pushed back against the Democratic immigration and border policies. The immigrant justice movement has been able to, especially during the Trump years, reduce deportations, create more sanctuary spaces and reduce some of the harm. Unfortunately, in this moment, the Harris campaign has now become hawkish on immigration, but if she is elected Silky fears that too many people will abandon the immigration justice movement, just like they have under Biden.
Harsha then talked about how the immigrant justice movement, particularly in so-called Canada, has been an anti-colonial/anti-imperialist movement, which not only believes that No One is Illegal, but that Nations States are the entities that are truly illegal. She says that this framing and narrative has provided space for the movement in Canada to become more abolitionist over time.
Walia also said, “The years and decades of austerity policies have forced our movements to to become too single issue. This is a consequence of having bipartisan Neo-Liberal economic policies.” For example, every 2 seconds someone is displaced because of climate change, but too often we don’t talk about how climate change causes displacement. Harsha says, “in fact, every major struggle – anti-imperialist, climate justice, labor justice, etc., are intertwined with immigrant justice.”
She ended her thread on this issue, by stating, “You can’t be anti-fascist today if you are not anti-border! In the same way that defund is the floor for abolition, status for all immigrants is the floor for anti-border imperialism.”
How Can the Left Respond to this Moment?
Later in the day I sat in on a live taping of the Laura Flanders Show, with guests Harsha Walia, Rachel Herzing, and Nick Estes.
The theme for the show/discussion was, how do we respond to this moment? We are led to believe that the most important thing we can do is to vote in November, despite the fact that there is no evidence that this actually creates the kind of change we want.
Harsha began by saying, “In this moment I think we need to think about Global Fascism and recognize it, along with the tendencies towards Fascism, as we recently saw at the DNC, with Harris saying that she wants to be more to the right on US border/immigration policies, law enforcement policies and of course the unconditional US support for the Israeli genocide.”
Nick responded by saying,”We need to learn from the history of Indigenous resistance. We also need to avoid falling into the electoral politics framework. There is no real choice.” Estes was also critical of the uncommitted movement, since they thought they could change the Democratic Party, plus he isn’t convinced that many of them will still vote for Harris.
A second question posed by Flanders was, “Are there any new possibilities and new forces outside of political party forces?”
Rachel stated that, “we need to have an intersectional analysis of the current crises, to see how they are inter-connected. The student encampments have been amazing and encouraging. Then there is the current crisis of Capitalism, where you see moments like the 2020 uprising, specifically to state violence, where protests shut down commerce and disrupted business as usual in lots of ways.”
Nick responded to the question by saying, “I think about the mobilization against Standing Rock and how so many people started to think about Indigenous struggles, just like how so many people have been mobilized to resist the US support for the Israeli genocide, and that so many people are not ignoring this issue. Plus, the bipartisan support for Israel should tell us something about the ruling class in this country.”
Harsha stated that, “the system and the structures in the US requires us to silo our struggles, which is especially played out in the the Non-Profit Industrial Complex.”
Flanders then came back to Estes, asking what he meant by his comments about Capitalism must die. Nick’s response was clear. “Capitalism must die, because even in the so-called green economy there is a reliance on extractivist practices, which always impacts Indigenous people the most. Line 3 and the ongoing carbon emissions from these projects are the direct outcome of Capitalism.” Estes also pointed out that Minnesota Governor Walz provided the financing and state support for the Line 3 project, which means that tar sands oil will flow through this pipeline for years to come, with untold amounts of carbon emission. Nick then commented, “But we are told by the DNC that Walz is an environmentalist.”
Rachel Herzing responded to the question by saying, “You can’t have the Prison Industrial Complex without Capitalism. It’s not about safety, it’s about generating profits from a system of carceral violence.”
Harsha Walia chimed in by saying, “We need to think about bordering as displacement, which happens around the world, but also happens within our own communities such as what happens with gentrification. Taking an abolitionist approach to borders, imperialism and Capitalism will be necessary if we want our movements to succeed.”
Bring the conversation back around to the upcoming election, Flanders wanted the panelists to talk about whether or not movement politics is at all compatiple with electoral politics? Nick Estes referred to an article he wrote in 2018, headlined, You can’t vote any harder. He then said that, “Deb Haaland has provided us with reports on the genocidal policies of Boarding Schools, but she has also presided over an increase in oil and gas drilling permits in the US.”
Rachel Herzing had her own question/comment, stating, “Will Black people be bamboozled by voting for a Black person, like we saw with Obama, and now with Harris? I do think it is worth think about down ballot voting, like local judges and school board members.” Rachel also shared that while in Atlanta recently, she saw a Black family with Law & Order logo T-shirt, with Harris 2024 underneath. She was puzzled and couldn’t tell if this was serious or if the family was making fun of the Harris/Walz ticket.
Harsha’s comments regarding movements and electoral politics was right to the point. “I am always blow away by the fact that if we don’t get involved in voting that shit will hit the fan, when in fact these are often the same people that don’t do much of anything beyond voting to reduce the harm or to create structures built on collective liberation.”
Nick Estes then shared an interesting observation about how systems of power when trying to do good are still engaging in harmful policies. “We learned that NGOs that worked on ending pipeline policies would talk about how the Keystone XL campaign was really connected to the US imperialism against Venezuela, since the Keystone XL project was a way of undermining Venezuela’s oil. Interestingly enough, the Venezuelans actually provided us Indigenous people with oil in the Dakotas, where we have some of the highest oil costs and some of the harshest winters. The 350 people did not want to talk about this connection, since it wouldn’t sell amongst their funders, which is a big problem for movement work.”
Laura Flanders ended with one last question for the panelists. She asked, “what gets you out of bed in the morning to keep doing what you do?” Rachel Herzing stated, “the abolition of imprisonment is happening right now. It is not some futurist vision, but a project/movement right now. What Black and Pink is doing on a daily basis is amazing, just like the work of Critical Resistance. I want to continue to be part of that. We have to organize and organize, especially in collective fashion, which is always absolutely necessary if we are to have a future.”
Nick Estes shared what he learned from the late Elizabeth Cook-Lynn, who said, “we don’t even own our own life, we are here to make things better for the future. This is how how we can be good ancestors.”
Harsha came back to a theme that has been repeated over and over again at this conference….. “How can we be in good relationships with each other. Ho do we find unity through struggle. How we are and how we are with each other is what really matters.”
Palestine Solidarity Information, Analysis, Local Actions and Events for the week of September 1st
It has been nearly 11 months since the Israeli government began their most recent assault on Gaza and the West Bank. The retaliation for the October 7 Hamas attack in Israel, has escalated to what the international community has called genocide, therefore, GRIID will be providing weekly links to information and analysis that we think can better inform us of what is happening, along with the role that the US government is playing. We will also provide information on local events and actions that people can get involved in. All of this information is to provide people with the capacity of what Noam Chomsky refers to as, intellectual self-defense.
Information
Israel plans colony on UNESCO heritage site as land theft surges
Western Media Outlets Are Complicit in Israel’s Genocide—and Must Be Held Accountable
Blinken Condemned for ‘Empty Words’ on Genocide as US Backs Israel’s Obliteration of Gaza
Palestinian Healthcare Workers Chained, Starved, Sexually Abused: New HRW Report on Israeli Prisons
US Has Sent Israel Over 600 Weapons Shipments Since October
Analysis & History
GAZA CEASEFIRE DEAL STALEMATED, WITH ANTONY LOWENSTEIN
Local Events and Actions
Power to Palestine: Weekly Rally in Grand Rapids
Wednesday, September 4th, 6pm – 7pm, Corner of Pearl St and Monroe in downtown GR.
https://www.facebook.com/events/992936209242057?ref=newsfeed
Image used is from B’tselem – Israeli Human Rights group.
Day Two – Socialism Conference: How to Abolish Rent and reflections on Capital and Abolition
The Abolish Rent session was a presentation/discussion by the co-authors of the new book, Abolish Rent: How Tenants Can End the Housing Crisis. Tracey Rosenthal and Leonardo Vichis, both long-time movement organizers, providing participants with great examples, cogent analysis and inspiring organizing tactics and strategies from tenants, mostly in Los Angeles where they reside.
The moderator for the session made a point early on in the discussion, that this book is a fabulous resource that can help us all re-frame the issue around the current housing crisis. In fact, one of the primary points they made is that we need to see rent as the crisis, not housing.
Other powerful re-framing statements the co-authors made were:
- Rent is a fine for a human need.
- Rent is the gap between tenants’ needs and landlords’ demands.
- Tenants live inside the landlord’s profit-maximization vise.
- Rent is a monthly tribute to those with generational wealth.
- Rent is an engine of inequity.
- Rent is our money, which landlords invest for their gain.
- Rent prevents us from caring for ourselves and each other.
- Behind each rent check is a threat of eviction.
- Behind each rent check is the threat of state violence.
The co-authors had many more re-framing comments and analysis that was critical to why abolishing rent is a central goal of any tenant movement.
Many of the stories they share centered the relationships that tenants built with each other and the power of the common lived experiences. According to the co-authors this often led to tenants taking collective action to demonstrate to each other the value of pushing the envelope and taking larger risks. In many ways what they were saying was what the great educator Paolo Freire always talked about, which was the take action, reflect on it, plan something else, and then engage in another action. This is how we learn, the co-authors said, by practicing risk and resistance, then seeing how systems of power react.
Tracy Rosenthal said that there are no blue prints to organizing. Sure, we can learn from past movements, but we can’t just repeat what they did, since system of power and oppression are always learning and evolving as well. Abolish Rent: How Tenants Can End the Housing Crisis is both a powerful and inspiring book, and should be widely read by anyone who wants to practice housing justice.
Capital and Abolition
When studying Capitalism and the Prison Industrial Complex, what does it mean to follow the money? This was the initial question asked by the moderator to both Lydia Pelot-Hobbs (The Jail is Everywhere: Fighting the New Geography of Mass Incarceration) and Ruth Wilson Gilmore (Abolition Geography: Essays Towards Liberation). Focusing on the Angola Prison in Louisiana, Pelot-Hobbs said, “Be ready to be wrong or inaccurate.” Angola prison was financed by the petro-oil industry as a result of the profits made during the early 70s OPEC oil boycott. These are all “mundane realities,” said Gilmore, talking about the research and following the money. “But we need to focus on the mundane so we can actually follow the money. We need to follow the minutia of capital expansion.”
The discussion then shifted to the difference between the anti-State State vs the Pro-State State. Both presenters talked about the need to not be completely dismissive of the important of the public good that governments can do, since they have an infrastructure that can benefit people. Wilson talked about the need to find a political and ideological space between anarchism and communism, which would not completely abandon the possibilities of influencing public dollars for public good.
Pelot-Hobbs talked about the organized abandonment of New Orleans after Katrina, where Neo-Liberal forces stepped in immediately and sought to dismantle public housing, public education and aspects of the abandonment of funding for infrastructure, which ultimately led to the levee breaks and the mass flooding of New Orleans. There was a tremendous amount of autonomous, grassroots Mutual Aid and organizing work being done after Katrina, which also needed some public institutions. There were important lessons learned from this for future organizing.
Ruth Wilson Gilmore then said, “Abolition is a way to find a space between communism and anarchism, communism with s small c.” She also talked about the idea of communist philanthropy, where we are creating and funding the world we want to make.
During the Q & A there were numerous comments and questions that led to some good discussion. However, there was one question/comment that stood out to me. The work of abolition and anti-imperialism, were both manifested by the 2020 uprisings and more recently the Palestine Solidarity Movement.
Ruth Wilson Gilmore said, “You can’t have abolition without anti-imperialism/anti-colonialism and you can’t have anti-imperialism/anti-colonialism with abolition.” For me, this was an important reminder and framing for the movement work we do in community. This led to another important statement, which was, “How are we fortifying our organizational links.” How are we connecting and collaborating, so as not to operate in silos, but also to strengthen each other’s movements and create better collective accountability.
Day One – Socialism Conference: US Tech complicity in genocide and Tenants organizing for Social Housing
In the No Tech for Apartheid session there was a Google worker who talked about when they and other Google workers began organizing to demand that the company end their relationship with Israel, the occupation and the current genocidal campaign against Palestinians. Google threatened them with termination if they continued.
Another speaker talked about target software and spyware companies that are working with Israel to support the ongoing Apartheid policies, like the Pegasus program.
All of these types of surveillance fits within the realities of racial capitalism, where the Palestinians are the primary target because of their ethnicity. The tech tools are being used precisely as a mechanism of control of the population that they seek to contain, which are the Palestinians.
Facial recognition tools are being used to both target Palestinians and restrict their movement within the occupied territories, much in the same ways that the US is using facial recognition to target dissidents and people who have been involved in resistance work, including those who are doing civil disobedience. For Palestinians the facial recognition is often categorizing people as Hamas militants and potential militants.
The reason that Google and Amazon are justifying these contracts is that it is to lay the groundwork for regional contracts to track and categorize people throughout the Middle East. These companies want to use their contracts with Israel as a showcase for the rest of the region.
All of these tools are being used and are linked together for the purpose of targeting and killing Palestinians that we are currently witnessing in real time with the Israeli genocide.
In terms of resistance, the speakers talked about the need to find “strategic levers” – to collectively disrupt production at the supply chain level.
For more information, see No tech for Apartheid.
Tenants organizing for Social Housing
In this session there were tenant organizers from all over the US talking about their work, but mostly focusing on the need for Social Housing.
I woman from New York City had gone to Vienna last year to see a fabulous model of social housing. She said they were amazing and all of the amenities what we normally see in high-end apartments in the US. One thing that she noticed while in the city of Vienna, was the fact that she couldn’t find people who were unhoused.
The New York City organizer ended her comments by say that NYC has 76,000 unhoused people, but 96,000 empty housing units. She talked about tenants taking buildings from landlords and building them up specifically for tenants. Her tenant union and others in New York City are demanding $40 billion for social housing.
Another tenant organizer talked about the importance of connecting with other unions, specifically labor unions, since many of their members are also tenants. For this tenant organizer, Social Housing means tenants are in charge, with high quality housing, with universal access – income, race, gender, sexuality, ability, etc. Social Housing needs to be total, not just one house or 1 block, because Capitalism will always try to kill it.
Another tenant organizer talked about Mobil home organizing, which is important, since there are more people living in mobil home parks in the US than there are people living in apartments. One of the critical issue with mobil home living currently, is the growing interest of speculative capital entities buying up mobil home parks.
There were other great examples of Social Housing happening in the US, and another California tenant organizer referred to a recent report entitled, Building Our Future: grassroots reflections on social housing. This report has tons of great examples of tenant organizing examples, plus places where Social Housing policies are being implemented.
State Board approves millions more for downtown development projects, while nearly half of Grand Rapidians live paycheck to paycheck
On Tuesday, the Michigan Strategic Fund Board unanimously approved $252.3 million of incentives for the 12,000 seat Amphitheater in downtown Grand Rapids. This announcement marks just the latest in a series of announcements, where millions of dollars in public money will be used to support the designed of the private group known as Grand Action 2.0.
WOODTV8 reported on the announcement, but did what most commercial news media outlets do, they celebrate the announcement and only cited the Executive Director of Grand Action 2.0.
Channel 8 didn’t even bother to inform people what the Michigan Strategic Fund Board does or that it was created by former Michigan Governor Rick Snyder in 2012, the same Governor who imposed a non-elected governing body in Flint, which led to the water crisis that has harmed thousands and impacted a whole generation of mostly poor and Black residents. Former Governor Snyder committed crimes, yet he continues to walk free.
The Michigan Strategic Fund Board is also made up of people from the corporate world, along with a few government staffers. Included among the MSF Board is Randy Thelen, the President and CEO of the Right Place Inc. Thelen has been a champion of the Amphitheater project from the beginning, along with the Soccer Stadium and any other downtown development project that use public funds.
You can read the memo from the Michigan Strategic Fund Board regarding the $252.3 million in public money for the Amphitheater, the Soccer Stadium and the adjacent over priced housing that will be built with both of these projects.
One yearns for the day when the State of Michigan, the Kent County Commission or the Grand Rapids City Commission unanimously approves $252.3 million for families that are subjected to poverty condition, where they can’t afford decent housing, are food insecure and don’t have the kind of health care coverage that government officials do. In July, I wrote about the most recent data in Grand Rapids residents that are living in poverty which is based on the ALICE standards – Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed. According to the ALICE report 47% for Grand Rapids households, which is nearly half of the households in Grand Rapids, are living paycheck to paycheck!
Now, we can yearn for a day when government officials will chose people over projects hatched by the rich, but such a day will never come. If we want to support people over profits, then we will need to be organized in such a way as to force government officials to fund real community needs instead of projects that will primarily make the rich members of Grand Action 2.0 even richer. Now that is the kind of day that I yearn for!
“In any case, the hidden hand of of foundations can control the course of social change and deflect anger to targets other than elite power.”
– Joan Roelofs, Foundations and Public Policy
The Dan and Pamela DeVos Foundation
GRIID has always begun our Foundation Watch work by looking at the foundations associated with the most powerful family in West Michigan, the DeVos family. GRIID has already looked at the Dick and Betsy DeVos Foundation, along with the Doug and Maria DeVos Foundation. Today, I want to look at the Dan and Pamela DeVos Foundation.
I am using the data from the foundation’s 990 document for 2022, which is the most recent year that is available. The Dan and Pamela DeVos Foundation has $6,114,272 of assets in the foundation’s account, which is just another way that members of the Capitalist Class to be able to hide their money from taxation.
Before I dive into how the Dan and Pamela DeVos Foundation distributed their funds, I wanted to point out that Dan and Pamela own the following components of the DeVos family empire – DP Fox, Fox Motors, the Pamela Roland Collection, the Grand Rapids Griffins, and are a partner in CWD Real Estate Investments, as we noted in Part II in the series on the Grand Rapids Power Structure.
The Dan and Pamela DeVos Foundation made contributions to dozens of entities in 2022, but there are some clear categories of groups they contributed to, such as the Religious Right, Think Tanks, Education-centered groups, and social service entities, to name a few. Below is a listing of each from these categories, with a dollar amount.
Religious Right
Keystone Community Church – $75,000
Far Right Think Tanks/Pro-Capitalist groups
Mackinac Center – $375,000
Education-centered groups
- Davenport University – $252,500
- GVSU – $425,000
- * Northwood University – $20,090,000 (Dan DeVos is on the Board of Trustees)
DeVos-owned, created or connected groups
- ArtPrize – $25,000 (this was the last year it was being run by Rick DeVos)
- Chicago Cubs Charities – $30,000
- Corewell Health Foundation – $225,000
- Grand Action Foundation 2.0 – $50,000
- * Grand Rapids Art Museum – $250,000 (Pamela DeVos is an honorary Trustee)
- Grand Rapids Griffins Youth Foundation – $52,560
- * Grand Rapids Symphony Society – $450,000 (Pamela Roland is a Board member)
- * Hope Network Foundation – $425,000 (Dan DeVos is a Board member)
- * John F Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts – $200,000 (Pamela DeVos is a Trustee)
- West Michigan Aviation Academy Foundation – $65,000
- * Whitney Museum of American Art – $550,000 (Pamela DeVos is on the Board of Trustees)
Groups receiving Hush $
- Baxter Community Center – $10,000
- Bethany Christian Services – $50,000
- Family Promise of Grand Rapids – $50,000
These groups all provide some sort of social service – people fleeing domestic violence, those who are housing insecure, people with disabilities, adoption and immigration. There are root causes to all of these issues, but these groups are not likely to address root causes and larger systems of oppression. When the DeVos family foundations make contributions, this will increase the likelihood that systems of oppression will not be addressed by these groups.
The Dan and Pamela DeVos Foundation gives less money to religious groups and right wing think tanks, compared to other DeVos Family Foundations. However, where they do stand out is in contributions to entities that either Dan or Pamela DeVos are board members. (Wherever you see an *) These groups receive millions or hundreds of thousands of dollars from the Dan and Pamela Foundation, which means they not only have a significant say in how their contributions are used, they get to influence policies in the organizations that they are board members of. In these cases they are doubling up on the kind of influence they have.
GRPD Chief Winstrom engages in a little Copaganda and the local news media never questions it
Last week, WXMI 17 posted a story after they submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the City of Grand Rapids regarding the cost of providing the police department to protect the Republican Presidential candidate Donald Trump, when he spoke in town back in July. According to the Fox 17 story, the cost of having the GRPD protect the Trump event was $69,000.00.
Unfortunately, the Fox 17 story did not center on the cost of having the GRPD provide protection for the presidential candidate. Instead, the story provided a platform for Chief Winstrom to make claims that the channel 17 reporter did not question or verify. Here are some of Winstrom’s comments:
“We have a strong law enforcement community here, and everybody stepped up and helped out, and we were able to properly staff the event.”
“We had about 30,000 total visitors. We had a line that stretched over a mile and a half,” Winstrom said. “What we knew was that it’s our job to keep everybody in the city safe.”
While these sentiments from Chief Winstrom sound nice, they are simply well crafted responses to give the appearance that the GRPD exit to keep people safe, when in fact they do not.
According to a report the group Interrupting Criminalization, entitled, Cops Don’t Stop Violence:
Addressing rising rates of violence requires deep investments in meeting our communities’ economic and social needs and in community-based violence prevention and interruption programs — NOT more policing. The bottom line is that police don’t stop violence, no matter how high their budgets are. It’s time to stop falling for cops’ fearmongering and throwing good money after bad in pursuit of safety cops are not set up to deliver.
We know that prisons and police don’t keep us safe or deter violence — and that they contribute tremendous amounts of violence to our communities. We know that research shows — and even some cops agree — that the best way to reduce violence and increase safety is to increase access to housing, healthcare, including mental health care, education, accessible, sustainable and living wage jobs, and community care, connection, and programs. It is this knowledge that is informing and driving campaigns to defund police and invest in community safety — because we know that is the only path forward toward safer, more just communities.
Since January 1st, I have been tracking news stories on public safety in Grand Rapids. From the beginning of the year through August 27th, there have been 360 stories that center the GRPD. Of those 360 stories, there were only 11 stories where the GRPD actually prevented violence. In the other 349 stories, the GRPD showed up after violence/harm had already been done.
The data I have been collecting on local news coverage clearly demonstrates that despite Chief Winstrom’s claim that the GRPD protects people, the exact opposite happens, unless of course you are a Presidential candidate speaking in Grand Rapids.






