Skip to content

What we are reading

September 23, 2010

Below is a list of books that we have read in recent weeks. The comments are not a review of the books, instead sort of an endorsement of ideas and investigations that can provide solid analysis and even inspiration in the struggle for change. All these books are available at The Bloom Collective, so check them out and stimulate your mind.

Antonio Gramsci, by Antonio Santucci – For those who have never heard of the Italian political prisoner, socialist thinker and cultural critic, this book is an excellent introduction into the life and thought of Antonio Gramsci. The author provides readers with a window into the political writings of Gramsci, as well as his prison notebooks. Gramsci was imprisoned by the fascist Mussolini regime and died in prison at the age of 48. His writings and his commitment to anti-capitalist thinking is an inspiration and worth investigating even today.

Common Ground in a Liquid City: Essays in Defense of an Urban Future, by Matt Hern – This was a fascinating book to read. Hern, who lives in Vancouver, discusses a variety of issues that fall under the broad category of urban life. The author does this by reflecting on what is happening in his city when he travels abroad. His experiences around the world force him to come to terms with what makes a vibrant city and what capital forces are at work that want to gentrify urban communities. For anyone interested in thinking about the future of cities, particularly one that does not favor the “creative class,” this book is an excellent resource.

Dismantling the Empire: America’s Last Best Hope, by Chalmers Johnson – This is a collection of essays written by Johnson during the end of the Bush years and the beginning of the Obama administration. In many ways this new book by Johnson picks up where his trilogy left off, with a critical assessment of the US Empire. Like his other books, the author provide important analysis of how the US functions as an empire. The book ends with a 10-point plan to dismantle the US Empire and even though his suggests are new, they do articulate a clear need for disarmament, and end to torture and the dismantling of US military bases abroad.

Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews Volume II, by Alan Hart – In this second volume, the former BBC reporter Alan Hart looks at the development of Israel after 1948 up to just before the 1967 War. Hart provides both personal experience as a reporter on Israel/Palestine and solid scholarly investigation into the role of the Zionist state. Hart’s access to Israeli leaders gives readers a first hand account of the relationship between Israel and the US prior to 1967. An important contribution to understanding the history of Israel and its policies.

The Rise of ‘Super PACs’ Continues, Leaving Voters in Dark as Attack Ads Fill Airwaves

September 23, 2010

(This article is re-posted from OpenSecrets.org.)

The proliferation of “super PACs” — political organizations armed with the ability to raise unlimited amounts of money from wealthy individuals and corporations and to spend huge sums explicitly advocating for or against candidates — continues at a staggering pace.

Thirty-three such committees have now registered their intention to raise unlimited sums for independent expenditures with the Federal Election Commission, according to a Center for Responsive Politics analysis of FEC data. 

High-level political operatives on both the left and the right have jumped into the fray, establishing these new “super PACs,” as OpenSecrets Blog has previously reported.

Two months ago, the FEC gave the official green light to special interest groups hoping to cash in on federal court rulings that loosened campaign finance rules. 

On July 22, the FEC gave its blessing to the conservative Club for Growth and the liberal Commonsense Ten, allowing them, and other groups like them, to form “super PACs,” officially known as “independent expenditure-only committees.” These committees can raise unlimited sums from individuals, corporations, unions and other groups. And with those massive war chests, they can run advertisements expressly advocating for or against federal candidates.

Some of these groups have yet to report raising a dime. Others have already raised millions of dollars — and are spending hundreds of thousands in competitive races across the country. One thing is clear: New groups of this sort continue to register with the FEC, and their influence will be felt during the final weeks of the campaign. (See a full list of these organizations later in the story.)

In previous election cycles, groups that wanted to run ads that expressly advocated for or against candidates faced more severe fund-raising restrictions. It was illegal for a person to contribute more than $5,000 per year to a political committee. This cycle, however, several legal opinions have transformed the campaign finance landscape and erased previous rules.

The Supreme Court’s January decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission overturned a century-old ban on corporate and union treasury funds being used in politics. While corporations and unions cannot make direct campaign contributions from their treasury funds, these monies can be used to fund advertisements that overtly encourage voters to elect or defeat federal candidates.

Furthermore, in March, a federal court in SpeechNow.org v. Federal Election Commission ruled that the government’s cap on donations to political committees was unconstitutional — so long as those groups don’t make direct contributions to candidates and don’t coordinate with candidates when running independent advertisements.

The following table lists all committees that intend to raise unlimited contributions through Sept. 20, including the date each group officially informed the FEC of their desire to raise unrestricted sums of money in accordance with the SpeechNow.org and Citizens United rulings.

FEC ID # Committee Name IE-Only Letter Filed
C00484287 AFL-CIO WORKERS VOICES PAC 9/20/2010
C00488940 NEW HOUSE INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURE COMMITTEE 9/14/2010
C00430876 WORKING FOR US POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE INC 9/10/2010
C00488759 AMERICAN WORKER INC, THE 9/10/2010
C00488742 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS CONGRESSIONAL FUND 9/10/2010
C00469890 PATRIOT MAJORITY PAC 9/9/2010
C00488783 SPEECHNOW.ORG 9/9/2010
C00473918 WOMEN VOTE! 9/8/2010
C00488569 COALITION TO PROTECT AMERICAN VALUES 9/7/2010
C00488494 NEW PROSPERITY FOUNDATION; THE 9/2/2010
C00488502 PROTECTING CHOICE IN CALIFORNIA 2010, A PROJECT OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD AFF OF CALIFORNIA 9/2/2010
C00488429 CITIZENS FOR STRENTH AND SECURITY PAC 9/1/2010
C00488437 CONCERNED TAXPAYERS OF AMERICA 9/1/2010
C00488403 TEXAS TEA PARTY PATRIOTS PAC 9/1/2010
C00487470 CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION 8/31/2010
C00488338 AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION PAC INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURES COMMITTEE 8/31/2010
C00423467 VOTE OUT INCUMBENTS FOR DEMOCRACY 8/30/2010
C00488486 COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA WORKING VOICES 8/30/2010
C00483693 SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION 8/19/2010
C00487785 HEADQUARTERS CMTE W HOLLYWOOD/BEV HILLS/STONEWALL DEM CLUB/STONEWALL YOUNG DEMS LTD 8/18/2010
C00487744 AMERICA’S FAMILIES FIRST ACTION FUND 8/17/2010
C00485854 LOUISIANA TRUTH PAC 8/11/2010
C00486688 FLORIDA IS NOT FOR SALE 8/5/2010
C00487280 CONSERVATIVES FOR TRUTH 8/2/2010
C00486878 PEOPLE’S MAJORITY 8/2/2010
C00486845 LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS VICTORY FUND 7/30/2010
C00482620 ARIZONANS WORKING TOGETHER 7/28/2010
C00487199 CITIZENS FOR ECONOMIC AND NATIONAL SECURITY 7/28/2010
C00484642 COMMONSENSE TEN 7/27/2010
C00484295 CALIFORNIANS FOR FISCALLY CONSERVATIVE LEADERSHIP 7/23/2010
C00485821 AMERICANS FOR NEW LEADERSHIP 7/9/2010
C00487363 AMERICAN CROSSROADS 7/9/2010
C00485011 CLUB FOR GROWTH ADVOCACY INC 6/17/201

Some of these organizations file monthly reports with the FEC, while others file quarterly. Only when such reports are filed do voters have a full accounting of the individuals, corporations and other groups funding the barrage of advertisements the groups are running. In many cases, disclosure of donors will not come until after Election Day.

Even with these seismic changes in the campaign finance landscape, some groups are still seeking to avoid any donor disclosure.

Several organizations — such as Crossroads Grassroots Political Solutions, or Crossroads GPS, a sister organization of the top conservative independent expenditure-only committee American Crossroads — have formed under section 501(c)4 of the U.S. tax code. This designation means the group’s donors will never be reported to the FEC or to the Internal Revenue Service and that its primary purpose is supposed to be the “promotion of social welfare.” Yet, so far, this designation hasn’t kept it from spending big bucks on political messages in hotly contested races.

Democrats have pushed for legislation, known as the DISCLOSE Act, which would require advertisements to include information about the top donors financing the ads. The measure also calls for the heads of organizations that run independent expenditures to appear in the ad to approve the message, like political candidates currently do.

That legislation passed the House earlier this summer. In July, Republicans successfully filibustered the bill in the Senate. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) plans to bring the bill up for another vote in the Senate on Thursday, although it’s unclear if any Republicans have undergone a change of heart.

The Next Mexican Revolution

September 22, 2010

(This article by John Ross is re-posted from CounterPunch.)

As the 100th anniversary of the Mexican revolution steams into sight, U.S. and Mexican security agencies are closely monitoring this distant neighbor nation for red lights that could signal renewed rebellion. The most treacherous stretch for those keeping tabs on subversion south of the border is between September 15th the recently celebrated bicentennial commemorating the struggle for Mexico’s independence from Spain, and November 20th, the day back in 1910 that the liberal Francisco Madero called upon his compatriots to take the plazas of their cities and towns and rise up against the Diaz government.

At least ten and as many as 44 armed groups are currently thought to be active in Mexico and the two months between the 200th anniversary of liberation from the colonial yoke and the 100th of the nation’s landmark revolution, the first uprising of landless farmers in the Americas and a precursor of the Russian revolution, is a dramatic platform from which to strike at the right-wing government of President Felipe Calderon.

Among the more prominent armed formations is the Popular Revolutionary Army (EPR) which rose against the government in 1996 and is based in Guerrero and Oaxaca, and three distinct split-offs: the Democratic Revolutionary Tendency (TDR); the Justice Commandos – June 28th, thought to be linear descendents of the followers of guerrilla chieftain Lucio Cabanas who fought the government along the Costa Grande of Guerrero in the 1970s; and the Revolutionary Army of the Insurgent Peoples (ERPI) which also espouses Cabanas’s heritage and is active in the Sierra of Guerrero where Lucio once roamed.

Others on the list released two years ago by the CISEN, Mexico’s lead anti-subversion intelligence-gathering apparatus, include the largely-disarmed Zapatista Army of National Liberation (EZLN), an indigenous formation that rose in Chiapas in 1994; the Jose Maria Morelos National Guerrilla

Coordinating Body, thought to be based in Puebla; and the Jaramillista Justice Commandos that takes its name from Ruben Jaramillo, the last general of revolutionary martyr Emiliano Zapata’s Liberating Army of the South gunned down by the government in 1964, which has taken credit for bombings in Zapata’s home state of Morelos.

The TAGIN or National Triple Indigenous and Guerrilla Alliance, thought to be rooted in southeastern Mexico, boasted in a e-mail communiqué at the beginning of the year that a coalition of 70 armed groups have agreed on coordinated action in 2010.

Also in the revolutionary mix are an unknown number of anarchist cells, at least one of which takes the name of Praxides G. Guerrero, the first anarchist to fall 100 years ago in the Mexican revolution. Primarily operating in urban settings, anarchist cells have firebombed dozens of ATM machines and banks, new car showrooms, bullrings, and slaughterhouses (many anarchists are militant vegans) in Mexico City, Mexico state, Guadalajara, San Luis Potosi, and Tijuana. The U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder has just added Mexican anarchist groups to the Obama government’s terrorist lists.

Thus far, no group in this revolutionary rainbow has struck in 2010, and the window is narrowing if Mexico’s twin centennials are to be a stage upon which to launch new uprisings. If this is to be the year of the next Mexican revolution, the time to move is now.

Objective conditions on the ground are certainly ripe for popular uprising. At least 70% of the Mexican people live in and around the poverty line while a handful of oligarchs continue to dominate the economy – Mexico accounts for half of the 12 million Latin Americans who have fallen into poverty during the on-going economic downturn. Despite Calderon’s much scoffed-at claims that the recession-wracked economy is in recovery, unemployment continues to run at record levels. Hunger is palpable on the farm and in the big cities. Indeed, the only ray of light is the drug trade that now employs between a half million and a million mostly young and impoverished people.

Labor troubles, always a crucible of revolutionary dynamics, are on the rise. A hundred years ago, conditions were not dissimilar. The fall-out from the 1906-7 world depression that saw precious metal prices, the nation’s sustenance, fall off the charts sent waves of unemployment across the land and severely impacted conditions for those still working. As copper prices bottomed, workers at the great Cananea copper pit scant miles from the Arizona border in Sonora state, went out on strike and owner Colonel William Green called in the Arizona Rangers to take the mine back. 26 miners were cut down and the massacre gave birth to the Mexican labor movement.

In March 2010, President Calderon dispatched hundreds of federal police and army troops to Cananea to break a protracted, near two-year strike at the behest of the Larrea family, the main stockholders in Grupo Mexicano Industrial which was gifted with the copper pit, the eighth largest in the world, after it was privatized by reviled ex-president Carlos Salinas in 1989. Calderon’s hard-nosed labor secretary Javiar Lozano has threatened arrest of miners’ union boss Napoleon Gomez Urrutia, now in self-exile in Vancouver Canada.

Lozano is also deeply embroiled in take-no-hostages battles with the Mexican Electricity Workers Union (SME) over privatization of electricity generation here that has cost the union, the second oldest in the country founded during the last Mexican revolution, 44,000 jobs. A near death hunger strike by the displaced workers failed to budge the labor secretary and SME members now threaten to shut down Mexico City’s International Airport.

History is often colored with irony. The first important battles in the Mexican revolution were fought around Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua, a key railhead on the U.S. border and a commercial lifeline to El Norte for dictator Porfirio Diaz. In skirmish after skirmish, the irregulars of Francisco Villa and Pascual Orozco challenged and defeated the dictator’s Federales and began the long push south to hook up with Emiliano Zapata’s southern army in Morelos state on the doorstep of the capitol.

Ciudad Juarez was devastated by the cruel battles between the revolutionaries and the dictator’s troops. Dead wagons plied the dusty streets hauling off the bodies of those who had fallen to be burnt out in the surrounding desert. Today, once again, Ciudad Juarez is the murder capitol of Mexico.

Over 1800 have been killed in this border city so far in 2010, a record year for homicides, as the homegrown Juarez drug cartel and its local enforcers, the “La Linea” gang, try to defend the “plaza”, the most pertinent drug crossing point on the 1964 mile border, from the Sinaloa cartel under the management of “El Chapo” Guzman, and his local associates “Gente Nueva” (“New People.”)

Much as today when the narco kings like “El Chapo” or his recently slain associate “Nacho” Coronel are vilified by the Mexican press and President Calderon as “traitors” and “killers” and “cowards”, 100 years back revolutionaries were cast as villains and vandals hell-bent on tearing down the institutions of law and order. Pancho Villa was universally dissed as a cattle rustler, a “bandido”, “terrorista”, and rapist. When Zapata, “the Attila of the South”, and his peasant army came down to Mexico City in 1914 to meet with Villa, the “gente decente” (decent people) locked up their homes and their daughters to protect them from the barbarian hordes.

Similarly, in 2010, the corporate press lashes out at the cartels and their pistoleros as crazed, drug-addled mercenaries who will shoot their own mothers if enough cash and cocaine are offered. Villa’s troops were no strangers to such accusations. “La Cucaracha”, the Villista marching song, pleads for “marijuana para caminar” (“marijuana to march.”)

All this duel centennial year, ideologically driven leftists here have been waiting with baited breath for a resurgence of armed rebellion such as in 1994 when the EZLN rose up against the “mal gobierno” in Chiapas, or in 1996 when the EPR staged a series of murderous raids on military and police installations – but the leftists may be barking up the wrong tree.

If revolution is to be defined as the overthrow of an unpopular government and the taking of state power by armed partisans, then the new Mexican revolution is already underway, at least in the north of the country where Calderon’s ill-advised drug campaign against the cartels (in which according to the latest CISEN data 28,000 citizens have died) has morphed into generalized warfare.

Although the fighting has been largely confined to the north, it should be remembered that Mexico’s 1910 revolution began in that geography under the command of Villa and Orozco, Venustiano Carranza, Alvaro Obregon, and Francisco Madero, and then spread south to the power center of the country.

Given the qualitative leap in violence, Edgardo Buscaglia, a keen analyst of drug policy at the prestigious Autonomous Technological Institute of Mexico now describes Calderon’s war as a “narco-insurgency” – a descriptive recently endorsed by U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Daily events reported in the nation’s press lend graphic substance to the terminology.

Narco-commandos attack military and police barracks, carrying off arms and freeing prisoners from prisons in classic guerrilla fashion. As if to replay the 1910 uprising in the north, the narco gangs loot and torch the mansions of the rich in Ciudad Juarez. The narcos mount public massacres in northern cities like Juarez and Torreon that leave dozens dead and seem designed to terrorize the local populous caught up in the crossfire and impress upon the citizenry that the government can no longer protect them, a classic guerrilla warfare strategy.

One very 2010 wrinkle to the upsurge in violence: car bombs triggered by cell phones detonate in downtown Juarez, a technology that seems to have been borrowed from the U.S. invasion of Iraq (El Paso just across the river is home to several military bases where returning veterans of that crusade are housed.) Plastique-like C-4 explosives used in a July 15th car bombing that killed four in downtown Juarez are readily available at Mexican mining sites.

Further into the interior, commandos thought to be operating under the sponsorship of the Zetas cartel, have repeatedly shut down key intersections in Monterrey, Mexico’s third largest city and the industrial powerhouse of the nation, with stolen construction equipment and stalled buses and trailer trucks purportedly to clear surrounding highways of traffic for the movement of troops and weaponry into this strategic region.

Now the narco-insurrection has invaded the political realm as manifested by the assassination of the one-time ruling PRI party’s front-running candidate for governor of Tamaulipas state in July 4th elections. But party affiliation doesn’t seem to be a determining factor in this ambience of fear and loathing. The kidnapping of right-wing PAN party Padrino Diego Fernandez de Cevallos, one of the most powerful politicos in Mexico and a possible presidential candidate in 2012, must send chills up and down the spines of Calderon and his associates.

Who actually put the snatch on “El Jefe” Diego remains murky. The Attorney General’s office is now pointing fingers at the Popular Revolutionary Army, which is active in the Bajio region where the PANista was taken last May 14th. In 2007, the EPR claimed credit for the bombing of PEMEX pipelines in Guanajuato and Queretero in retaliation for the disappearances of two of its historical leaders.

The Mexican military has long calculated the eventual “symbiosis of criminal cartels with armed groups that are disaffected with the government” (“Combat Against Narco-Traffic 2008” issued by the Secretary of Defense.)

50,000 of the Mexican Army’s 140,000 troops and large detachments of Naval Marines are currently in the field against the narco-insurrectionists. With an eye to the eventual “symbiosis” of the drug gangs with armed guerrilla movements, the U.S. North Command which is responsible for keeping the North American mainland free of terrorists and regards Mexico as its southern security perimeter recently sent counter-insurgency trainers here to assess threats – their visit was confirmed at a Washington D.C. press conference July 21st by Under-secretary of Defense William Wechsler.

Meanwhile, the military is setting up new advance bases in regions where there have been recent guerrilla sightings such as the Sierra Gorda, strategically located at the confluence of Queretero, Guanajuato, and San Luis Potosi states.

Leftists who have been awaiting a more “political” uprising in 2010 are not convinced by Buscaglia’s nomenclature. A real revolution must be waged along ideological and class lines which the narco-insurrection has yet to manifest. Nonetheless, given the neo-liberal mindset of a globalized world in which class dynamics are reduced to market domination, the on-going narco-insurrection may well be the best new Mexican revolution this beleaguered nation is going to get.

3rd Congressional Candidates on the Economy

September 22, 2010

Many recent polls have shown that the number one concern for many Americans in the economy, which means jobs and the cost of living. This is particularly true for those who live in Michigan, where poverty rates continue to increase and unemployment stands between 13 – 15%.

Considering the seriousness of the economic crisis we thought it would be worth looking at where the 3rd Congressional District candidates stood on this issue. The election is just six weeks away and there has been very little coverage of the 3rd Congressional race. The Grand Rapids Press has only run 2 stories on this race since Labor Day, one on a debate between Miles and Amash, while the other article looked at GOP endorsements for Miles.

Since there has been no coverage of the candidate’s position on the economy and jobs since the Primary Election in early August we are relying on what they have posted on their websites.

Justin Amash (R) says he believes in the “free market” and places most of the blame on government taxes and government spending.

Government actions to restrict trade, prop up failing companies, and discriminate against non-union workers have blocked real innovation and damaged the economy. Federal stimulus programs, combined with government efforts to manipulate the money supply, simply add to our skyrocketing debt and fuel further inflation. Government cannot “create” jobs—it can only shuffle jobs and resources from one place to another. Innovation and entrepreneurship create jobs, and both are blocked when the government tries to dictate artificial outcomes in society.”

Based on the rhetoric that the Amash campaign is using, he is advocating for a more Libertarian approach to the economy, where government should just get out of the way and allow the market to “create jobs.” However, such a position does not hold up when one looks at the impact that government deregulation of the economy has had with the economic crash since 2008.

Pat Miles (D) is putting his emphasis on helping small businesses, which he claims is what really creates jobs. Miles plan to “fix” the economy is:

• Lower small business taxes and increase their access to capital so they can create jobs.

• Allow companies which purchase American-made equipment or machinery to accelerate their depreciation expense to receive larger tax deductions and a faster return on their investment.

• Work to institute a temporary payroll tax holiday for small businesses to encourage companies to hire more workers, and to get money back into workers’ pockets.

• Expand research and development tax credits to spur innovation.

• Support new technologies and invest in the conversion to a clean energy economy to ensure the next generation of breakthroughs and manufacturing in this growing industry happens here in West Michigan (and reduces U.S. dependence on foreign oil).

• End tax breaks for big corporations when they ship American jobs overseas.

• Insist on fair and reciprocal trade agreements since West Michigan workers and products can compete with any in the world when there is a level playing field.

While it is encouraging that Miles was to see fair trade agreements it does not say that he would work to repeal or reform NAFTA or CAFTA, both of which have caused job loss in Michigan. It also seems clear that Miles supports more tax breaks for businesses so that it will “spur innovation” and “create jobs,” even though he provides no evidence that that is what tax breaks for businesses will do.

Interestingly enough, even though Miles is backed by some area unions, he says nothing about what he would do for working people. There is no mention of his stance on the Employee Free Choice Act, workers wages or benefits, nor the devastating levels of poverty that working class people are subjected to under the current economy in Grand Rapids.

The Libertarian candidate for the 3rd Congressional seat, James Rogers, takes a traditional Libertarian point of view – minimize the government’s role in the economy. Part of this Libertarian approach means no government subsidies to energy companies and no bailouts.

Ted Gerrard, the US Taxpayers Party candidate, put his emphasis on reducing the federal budget. He also says the government should:

“Reduce spending by 10% across the board; Government sells all interests in private companies (GM, Fanny, Freddy); Enforce immigration law, fully implement E verify for SSN’s; Equal environmental standards for all products sold in the US; and Human Rights standards for all products sold in the US.”

Like the other candidates Gerrard does not even mention working people, current unemployment and poverty levels in West Michigan.

The Green Party candidate, Charlie Shick, believes that job creation would occur with the repeal of “every free trade agreement in which the US in entered, unless the partner nation observes labor and environmental laws on par with our American system. Without this well of slave labor at their disposal, manufacturers and other industries would once again return to the American workforce.”

Shick also says that if elected he would bring the platform of the Green Party to DC, which has a much more progressive stance on economic justice and basic rights for all. Part of that platform would call for diverting much of the current military budget towards meeting basic family needs such as housing, health care and education.

Regardless of where people stand on the economy, it is clear that there is little public debate about it coming from any of the candidates.

Media Bites – Cars and Freedom

September 21, 2010

In this week’s Media Bites we take a look at a recent commercial from the Dodge car company. The ad wants viewers to equate their vehicles with political freedom and use a re-creation of a battle from the Revolutionary War to illustrate this point.

The big difference with this battle scene is that George Washington is driving a Dodge Charger instead of a horse. The reality is that car dependency in this country has not really brought us more freedom. The social, political and ecological consequences have been devastating.

However, it is important that people understand that the shift away from mass transit systems in the 1920s was due mostly to an effort by General Motors and the Firestone Company to buy up urban trolley systems as is well documented in the film Taken for a Ride.

Race and Racism in Grand Rapids: An interview with playwright Stephanie Sandberg

September 20, 2010

Today, we interviewed Stephanie Sandberg, Calvin College Professor and playwright of the important work Seven Passages: The Stories of Gay Christians.

Stephanie’s new play entitled lines: the lived experience of Race was the subject of our interview. We discussed her motives for exploring the issue of racism in Grand Rapids, what she learned from the process, how racism manifests itself in today’s Grand Rapids and her hopes for this new work to contribute to the necessary dialogue that needs to take place for racial equality to truly exist in this community.

For information on the dates & times for the public performances, check out Actors Theater.

The 3rd Congressional Race and political labels

September 20, 2010

Today the Grand Rapids Press and MLive have a story about a group of traditional GOP supporters who are backing a Democrat for the 3rd Congressional race.

The Press lists the 50 people who have decided to back Democratic candidate Patrick Miles Jr. over the Republican candidate Justin Amash. Reporter Jim Harger states, “The campaign of Miles, a Grand Rapids resident, is hoping the endorsements will position him as a centrist while labeling Amash, of Cascade Township, as a conservative ideologue who would lack influence in Washington if elected.

The premise of the article is that the Miles campaign trying to present their candidate as a moderate and Amash as an extremist. Several people cited in the story make these claims, but there is virtually no information or verification of these claims in the article.

The only statement that provided readers with any sense of what either candidate’s politics are was a response from the Amash campaign to the announcement of the GOP endorsements of Miles. “Most 3rd District voters are not looking for a candidate like Pat Miles who is pro choice and supports higher taxes, government-run health care and out-of-control spending.”

A reasonable response from any competent journalist would have been to verify such claims, but the Press reporter doesn’t bother to look at the platform of Miles to see if he is pro choice, supports higher taxes and a government run health system.

Instead the Press reporter just provides comments from traditional GOP voters who are now endorsing Miles. Instead of just accepting the claims made by either campaign the Press reporter should have called into question the claims and provided readers with information to help the public determine what the platform and voting record of Amash actually is in order to determine if his views are “extreme.”

The fact is that neither candidate provides many details on where they stand on key issues and this is what the Press should be pursuing. What good does it do for the public to get coverage of an election that is centered around labels? While it is clear that political campaigns are always trying to paint their opponents as too liberal, too conservative or moderates, these labels are meaningless unless we can make clear determinations on where they stand on the issues.

Power Politics in West Michigan

September 19, 2010

Over the past few days some of us who write for GRIID were reporting on the West Michigan Regional Policy Forum held in Grand Rapids. The commercial media referred to this gathering as group of businessmen with “West Michigan values.”

Now, I don’t know about you, but I am never really sure what anyone means when they say West Michigan values. One could argue that they mean Christian Reformed Church values, but that surely only represents a certain sector of those who reside in West Michigan.

For this writer, those gathered at the West Michigan Regional Policy meeting represented local economic and political elites – CEOs, lawyers, people who are board of directors, politicians and investors. These people do not represent West Michigan values, they represent the values of people who have a great deal of power and want to increase that power or at a minimum maintain their current levels of power.

The goals of the group are pretty clear. They want to influence regional and state policy to benefit their interests. The goals they have laid out are to cut taxes to businesses, eliminate government regulation of business, privatize more of the public sector (such as education) and make Michigan a right-to-work state.

The West Michigan Regional Policy Forum plans to achieve these goals the old fashion way. To manipulate public opinion and to pay for politicians that will represent their interests.

To manipulate public opinion the group brought to their gathering Rick Berman, a man who has represented corporate interests for decades. Berman creates what are called Front Groups (in some circles Astroturf groups) that pose as grassroots entities in order to manipulate public opinion and often the news media into thinking they are an independent grassroots entities.

The truth is that Berman’s front groups have been financed by the tobacco industry, the alcohol industry, agribusiness, the animal cruelty industry and in general corporate America through his anti-union front groups. Berman was in West Michigan to help the local elites to figure out how to get the public to support a right-to-work policy.

Besides bring political assassins like Berman to town the group made it painfully clear that they were going to financially back candidates that embraced their agenda. Peter Seechia and Doug DeVos both made that perfectly clear in their comments to those gathered for the two-day forum.

Part of the packet that they provided to the 600 plus in attendance was a voter guide with a list of endorsed candidates throughout West Michigan. On day two the forum began with a Q&A session with gubernatorial candidates Rick Snyder and Virg Bernero, which was a pretty impressive feat considering that up to that point the candidates had not really appeared together (besides a mid September Town Hall that Snyder held where Bernero just showed up).

What the policy group was doing was vetting the two candidates to see which would be more loyal to their agenda. Both candidates argued that they were more “business friendly” than the other and neither of them really disagreed with the platform of the group except on one issue. Both candidates did not support making Michigan a right-to work state.

Now imagine for a second if candidates for the highest office in the state were to fight and argue which one was more committed to working people, racial justice, immigrants, protecting the environment, seriously reducing carbon emissions, health care as a right, mass transit and supporting reproductive rights for women. You can imagine it all you want but this reality does not exist in the US for two main reasons.

First, people who are fighting for economic justice, racial equality, mass transit, health care as a right, reproductive rights and environmental sustainability are not organized well enough to command the attention of political candidates. They clearly do not have the capital to influence these candidates and more importantly they do not have enough political power to demand change.

The second reason why we can’t imagine candidates fighting to be the best representatives for these movements is because they don’t have to. Unions, women’s groups, environmentalists and other grassroots sectors overwhelmingly will vote for Democrats and not really demand anything in return, thus leaving Democrats free to continue to support business as usual.

The Grand Rapids Press ran an AP article on September 18 that summed up this mentality quite well. The headline read: “Dems tell voters: You may hate us, but GOP is worse.” The whole article was about the Democratic Party’s main message between now and the November elections, which was essentially that they don’t represent people’s interests, but at least they aren’t as bad as the Republicans. Now that is a campaign message we can really rally around now isn’t it?

What we ought to consider and what has always made a difference in this country is creating autonomous movements that are not tied to political parties. The abolitionist movement, the women for an 8-hour work day, the civil rights movement, the feminist movement and many other movements that have actually achieved change were not beholden to political parties. Something to consider as we watch candidates jockey to win approval from the business class.

Michigan shortfalls in education a concern for business leaders

September 18, 2010

(This is one of several articles that GRIID will post over the next few days based upon our attendance at the West Michigan Regional Policy Forum.)

Dr. Shirley Robinson Pippins works as the senior vice president of programs and services for ACE, the American Council on Education. ACE  lobbies for the interests of campus executives and leaders of higher education “in matters of public policy in Washington, DC, (the location of its offices) and throughout the nation.”

Pippins was a good choice for the assigned topic, “Making Michigan Globally Competitive, Cradle through Multiple Careers.” She began her career working in Headstart programs, including one here in Grand Rapids. However, this writer finds the business sector’s interest in molding infants and preschoolers, let alone elementary and high school students, into a “competitive” labor force troubling at the very least.

Despite that concern, Pippins’ rapid fire talk brought out some key problems with our educational system that the business sector may not have wanted to hear. “For global competitveness, you need a diversified, skilled workforce. The key is that the foundation of education and skills is not just for a privileged few but for everyone,” she opened. “The US no longer leads the world in post secondary attainment.”

Pippins noted that among the challenges facing Michigan’s job market, 62% of new jobs will require post secondary education and only 33% of its adults have attained that. Michigan has a shrinking pool of high school graduates; 13% of our adults have neither a high school diploma or a GED–and Michigan’s current GED  policies throw up barriers making it difficult for many to complete GED programs. “The best and brightest are leaving Michigan at alarming rates. If a student leaves the state for education, they probably won’t return to that state.”

Pippins went on to say that Michigan is home to many educational disparities. Poor children and black children are left behind because of insufficient funding for education at all levels. When students get to college, they lack academic preparedness. And, there is insufficient financial aid for the poor. Because the state is cutting aid to colleges and universities, tuition costs rise making higher education less attainable. “There is a lack of academic preparedness and insufficient financial support for the poor,” Pippins said. “You have substantial gaps between whites and blacks and both groups fall behind their counterparts in other states.”

Pippins didn’t mention Michigan legislation that prevents prohibits affirmative action programs. It seems this, too, is most likely widening the gap between the number of blacks and whites attending colleges and universities.

She did say t hat Michigan’s best and brightest kids are taking less math, that reading and writing skills are lacking and, their scores on advanced placement tests all raise concern. Another problem, Michigan has a low “persistence to degree completion” rate. In other words, many who begin college don’t finish. “Michigan needs to improve its post secondary education attainment levels, stop loosing students and increase academic success” if the goal is a competitive global work force.

Pippin said the state needs to “begin at the beginning” with effective early intervention, She mentioned the Michigan Early Childhood Investment Corporation and private sector/public education initiatives in other states, Again, this writer finds the intrusion of private sector business into public education troubling.  She also mentioned that the state needs to develop lifelong education models that better prepare high school students for college; increase the number of students graduating from community colleges (where the state has high non-completion rates); and implement effective adult education models, including GED programs that are more accessible and better focused on readying people for college or career.

“If we’re not supporting higher education, it’s hard to have incredible expectations,” Pippin said. “That starts with K to 12 . . . so we get our best and brightest involved in the system.”

Grand Rapids People’s History Project – Interview with Michael Johnston

September 17, 2010

As part of the Grand Rapids People’s History Project we recently interviewed Michael Johnston. Michael is a retired teacher, editor of Grand Valley Labor News and local labor historian.

Michael Johnston has been involved in documenting numerous aspects of labor history in West Michigan and wrote his masters thesis on labor history in Grand Rapids.

The interview is broken up into seven parts. In Part I Johnston talks about the suppressed history of labor organizing in Grand Rapids.

In Part II Johnston talks about the working conditions for workers before the 1911 furniture workers strike and the strike itself.

In Part III Johnston addresses how the political elites responded to the 1911 furniture workers strike and how that impact local politics to this day.

In Part IV Johnston talks about the labor press history in Grand Rapids and the commercial paper’s reporting on the furniture workers strike of 1911.

In Part V Johnston talks about any efforts to organize farm workers in West Michigan.

In Part VI Johnston speaks about more recent labor run publications and labor run print shops.

In Part VII Johnston talks about why it is important to understand this history and what it can mean for anyone doing organizing work today.