Skip to content

Lessons on the history of US Immigration Policy #7: Trump and the use of the Alien Enemies Act

April 1, 2025

So far in this series on lessons on the history of US Immigration Policy, I have looked at the question – Is the US a Nation of Immigrants in Part I; how anti-immigration policies in the US are bipartisan in Part II; the dominant narrative around how we talk about immigrants in Part III; and an investigation into the root causes of people migrating to the US, especially those coming from Latin America, in Part IV. In Part V, I looked at false narratives about immigrants and the importance of creating counter-narrative. In Part VI, I want to look at how US immigration policy has historically been grounded in a white supremacy framework.

In today’s post, I want to look at President Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act and what people are being targeted by ICE with the 227 year old policy. In 1798, Hamilton joined other Federalists in supporting the very first anti-immigration laws, the Alien and Sedition Acts, promulgated by President John Adams. These statutes increased from five to fourteen the years of residency required for new immigrants to become eligible for citizenship and empowered the president to deport or detain anyone deemed “dangerous to the peace and safety of the United States.”

Radical historian Howard Zinn says that part of the reason why the US government adopted the Alien Enemies Act and the Sedition Act was related to the French Revolution (1789 – 1799). Zinn says that French immigrants to the US were suspected of being sympathizers of their revolution back home and spreading revolutionary ideas here. 

The Brennen Center says that the Alien Enemies Act has been invoked three times, each time during a major conflict: the War of 1812, World War I, and World War II. In World Wars I and II, the law was a key authority behind detentions, expulsions, and restrictions targeting German, Austro-Hungarian, Japanese, and Italian immigrants based solely on their ancestry.

However, there have been other instances when the Alien Enemy Act has been used to justify targeting people who questioned the US government. During WWI, there was a crackdown against political dissidents, especially those that were critical of the US involvement in that war. As I wrote in my book, A People’s History of Grand Rapids: 

The Espionage Act was passed in 1917 as a means to silence and punish those who spoke out against the US entry into World War I. However, as radical historian Howard Zinn points out, these laws were not applied equally and were meant to target dissidents during WWI, particularly radical labor organizers, socialists and anarchists. Some of those arrested for opposing the US entry into WWI were arrested and jailed, while others were arrested and deported.

The level of contempt that the US government held against radicals involved in labor organizing and anti-WWI activities eventually led to the Palmer Raids (1919-1920) as a justification for cleansing” the US of radical leftists, socialists and anarchists.

According to Christopher Finan’s book, From the Palmer Raids to the Patriot Act, there were over 6,000 people arrested across 36 cities during the Palmer Raids. Finan also states that there were 556 foreign citizens were deported, including a number of prominent leftist leaders.

The other major omission from the Brennen Center regarding the use of the Alien Enemies Act, has to do with the US government’s response to September 11, 2001. The US Patriot Act is one of the most repressive acts adopted, which was supported by both Republicans and Democrats. The Patriot Act was an extension of the Alien Enemies Act, in that it provided the US government a pretext to arrest, detain and deport people suspected as terrorism. Thousands of Arab and Muslim residents in the US were rounded up, questioned and many of them were held for long periods of time without being charged with any crimes

This brings us to the present, where the Trump Administration is invoking the Alien Enemies Act as a justification for targeting people who are critical of US policy and using Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to make the arrests. It is important that we come to terms with this history and avoid claims that the Trump Administration is the most repressive, when in fact, the Trump Administration is just the latest to use repressive measures against US citizens and foreign nationals residing in the US. 

If your organization is interested in a presentation on the History of US Immigration Policy, please contact me at sjeff987@gmail.com. 

Pure Copaganda: New Trailer for GRPD TV series and local news coverage about All Access PD Grand Rapids Part II

March 31, 2025

A little over a week ago, I posted an initial article regarding the local commercial news media coverage of the upcoming HBO/MAX TV series on the Grand Rapids Police Department. In that post I wrote:

The All Access PD Grand Rapids TV series should be seen for exactly for what it is, pure Copaganda. Regardless of what the TV show producer has to say about the GRPD, Black, Brown, immigrant and activists communities know better about how the GRPD really operates. These communities know that there is no real transparency or accountability since Winstrom arrived. The news coverage of the upcoming TV series provides no critique of the GRPD, nor do they include critical community perspectives.

Since the post from last week, the local commercial news media have continued to not so much as report on the GRPD-centered TV show, but hyped it. All three Grand Rapids-based TV stations reported on All Access PD Grand Rapids TV series which begins April 8.

In the WOODTV8 story the reporter and the news readers frame the issue using the GRPD’s perspective. What they had to say is followed by Chief Winstrom, who creates his own narrative around the issue of trust in the community. There is one critical voice, the President of the local NAACP chapter, Cle Jackson, but his comments to provide clear reasons for why he doesn’t think the TV series help build community trust. The channel 8 reporter also spoke with Marian Barrera-Young, executive director of the Baxter Neighborhood Association, who thought that the TV series could be beneficial. It should be noted, that the Baxter Neighborhood Association, receives CDBG funding and Barrera-Young is also the crime prevention coordinator, which means she works directly with the GRPD. The GRPD also has a cop who works out of the Baxter Neighborhood Association, so it is unlikely that there would be any critique of the GRPD coming from this source.

The WXMI 17 story from last week has no critical perspectives and the only source cited in the story is Chief Winstrom. In fact, the channel 17 story is mostly about the fact that Winstrom showed the trailer for the upcoming TV series at the Public Safety Committee last Tuesday and then Winstrom telling the reporter that the show is not scripted and “it just makes us look human.” Of course the TV show about the GRPD is scripted, just like how all TV shows are scripted. The only way for any media to not be scripted is if it is live and unedited. All media is constructed, which is one of the basic principles of Media Literacy.

The WZZM 13 story did not address the HBO/MAX show that will air next week, but it included the same talking points from Chief Winstrom about how crime is down in Grand Rapids, specifically shootings. Unfortunately, the WZZM 13 reporter doesn’t question the data nor does the reporter ask basic questions about why shootings have decreased. The Channel 13 reporter simply takes the GRPD Chief at his word, without seeking out other sources or opinions. 

These three stories are consistent with my news monitoring report from 2024, where the local news media rarely questioned the GRPD and often used the GRPD-created narrative about what was happening in this community. It is also worth pointing out that in all of the 673 policing/public safety stories over the past 12 months, there have only been 16 stories about community-based groups doing crime prevention work. Lastly, of all these 673 stories that centered around crime, there were only 11 stories about the GRPD actually preventing crime, which means in most of the stories the GRPD showed up after a crime had been committed. This should tell us something about the real function of the GRPD.

As I noted in Part I, beginning on April 8th, GRIID will watch each of the 8 shows about the GRPD, provide a critique of the series and juxtapose concrete examples and data on how the GRPD operates and functions in the service of power. 

 

This Isn’t Working film festival and community discussion in Grand Rapids – Saturday, April 5th

March 31, 2025

Whether we are talking about capitalism, the prison industrial complex of the political system in the US, those systems don’t work for most of us. Those systems do work for the most politically and economically powerful in this country and in Grand Rapids, because those systems were designed that way.

The organizers of the film festival in Grand Rapids this Saturday write:

You know you’ve been meaning to end that toxic relationship with the state for a while … Tell the system “We need to talk” and come join us to dream and co-create new worlds together. The creators of two of two of the films will be there! All donations go to the family of Patrick Lyoya! 

Here is the line up for the 3 films, along with discussion times:

Opening and Mingling 12PM to 12:30PM

Reimagining Safety Documentary: 12:30 – 2PM

Reimagining Safety Discussion with the Filmmaker: 2 – 2:30PM

The Elements of Mutual Aid Documentary: 2:30 – 3PM

Mutual Aid Discussion with the Filmmakers: 3 – 3:30PM

Break: 3:30 – 4PM

The Feminist on Cell Block Y Documentary: 4 – 5:30PM

Final Discussion and Closing: 5:30-6PM

The film festival is being hosted at Fountain Street Church 24 Fountain Street Northeast Grand Rapids, MI 49503. There is no cost for the event, but you can make a donation, which will go directly to the family of Patrick Lyoya.

Rep. Scholten’s Town Hall was filled with partisan pandering, fake populist rhetoric and a clear reminder of why we need mass movements if we want to fight for real change

March 30, 2025

I finally had a chance to sit down and watch the Grand Rapids Town Hall meeting hosted by Rep. Hillary Scholten. I didn’t attend the meeting, because I was at a training with GR Rapid Response to ICE. You can watch the entire town hall with Scholten at this link.

Like most town hall meetings that are held by politicians, it was a managed and performative event. Rep. Scholten made everything about Trump and Musk, but didn’t really talk about what Democrats were doing or not doing. Scholten said things like, “I could be watching March Madness with my children but I am here.” It’s your job, so don’t make it sound like you are sacrificing your time to be with the public. 

Scholten also repeatedly said that there are things that she can’t discuss in public. What the hell does that mean? If the Democrats have a plan or a strategy, why wouldn’t she share that? Scholten said she has introduced bills, but these are pretty meaningless actions, since the Democrats don’t have a majority in Congress, but it makes them look progressive. Scholten also repeatedly pointed out that she is the only person in West MI holding in person town hall meetings. While this is true, for the first two years in Congress Scholten only held call in town halls, so it is a bit disingenuous to try to appear as a populist, when she hasn’t made this a priority in the past.

Questions with few real answers

After 10 minutes of fake populist rhetoric the Q & A portion began. The first questions was about students being hauled off by ICE agents. To be clear those that have been targeted so far are Pro-Palestinian people who have been picked up by ICE. Scholten made a claim about everyone having the right to free speech, but she failed to acknowledge her own role in attacked the pro-Palestine campus movement, which I have documented.

Last April, Scholten introduced legislation, co-sponsored by a Republican, that was essentially attacking the pro-Palestine campus movements. Scholten was one of 9 co-sponsors of H.R. 7478, which was introduced by Rep. Rudy Yakym from Indiana. Scholten is only one of two Democrats who cosponsored this shitty piece of legislation that includes the likes of Rep. Elise Stefanik from New York. Stefanik has been the person leading the charge to discredit universities who allow Palestine Solidarity actions or Middle East Studies that question Israel’s illegal occupation of Palestinian land. Scholten can claim that people have the right to protest, but she voted for legislation to undermine people’s right to protest.

There were several questions asked about how the public can resist what the Trump administration is doing. Scholten’s response to those questions was to engage in rhetoric critical of Trump and Musk – which people cheered – without talking about actual ways that people can resist beyond voting in the next election. People also asked questions about what the Democrats are doing. Scholten took the opportunity to highlight that she attended the 60th anniversary of what is often referred to as Bloody Sunday, where police beat Civil Rights activists during a march through Selma across the Edmund Pettus Bridge. Not only was her presence simply a photo op, there was no accountability around Scholten’s betrayal of the Civil Rights Movement, which I also wrote about.  

Someone then asked Rep. Scholten, “How do you get people to vote in their interest?” Her answer was that she would host more Town halls and people should subscribe to her newsletter. These are the same, tired answers that do little or nothing to actually benefit people who are struggling to survive. 

There was a Pastor who works with refugees and asked what is Congress doing to protect immigrants and green card holders. Scholten gave a canned response, by saying she has spent last 20 years working on immigration. Schoten pointed to the child immigrant labor abuses and her co-sponsoring the Dignity Act, but failed to acknowledge her push to further militarize the US/Mexican border and that she has voted 3 times this year with Republicans to pass anti-immigration legislation, all of which will further criminalize undocumented people.

There were also questions about the US Budget, about school shootings, about the threats against Medicare and Social Security. Scholten’s answers were always the same, where she tried to make herself look good, without really making any real changes. The only answers that Scholten could give were for people to speak out, and the best way to do that was to vote. 

What Rep. Scholten did was standard for what the Democratic Party has done for decades, which is to blame Republicans, but to not actually fight for people. When are we going to realize that throughout US history, the most effective way to fight for change is through organized, grassroots movements. We need to learn from the abolitionists, the worker-led struggles for economic justice and workplace democracy, the feminist fight for liberation from patriarchy, queer and trans movements, the anti-war/anti-imperialism movements and the movements for environmental and climate justice. Change always comes from the ground up and politicians only do the right thing when people force them to do so. 

Palestine Solidarity Information, Analysis, Local Actions and Events for the week of March 30th

March 29, 2025

It has been almost 18 months since the Israeli government began their most recent assault on Gaza and the West Bank. The retaliation for the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack in Israel, has escalated to what the international community has called genocide, therefore, GRIID will be providing weekly links to information and analysis that we think can better inform us of what is happening, along with the role that the US government is playing. We will also provide information on local events and actions that people can get involved in. All of this information is to provide people with the capacity of what Noam Chomsky refers to as, intellectual self-defense.

Information  

“The Target is Unmistakable”: The Shooting of Gaza’s Children 

Israel Bombs Gaza’s Only Cancer Hospital as Genocide Continues to Escalate 

Death Toll in Gaza Surpasses 50,000 as Israeli Strikes Persist 

Reclaiming the Palestinian Narrative 

ISRAEL LEVELED GAZA — THEN KILLED THE DRONE JOURNALISTS WHO SHOWED IT TO THE WORLD 

Inside Israel’s brutal offensive on Jenin

Rabbis for Justice in Palestine 

The Last Chapter of the Genocide

In Gaza, We Now Ask: Will It Be the Cold, Hunger or Airstrikes That Kill Us? 

L3Harris: Convert to Peace Work or We Will Shut You Down

Analysis & History  

“Striking Hard at Civilians”: A Supremacist Ideology Underlies Israeli Policy 

Sanitizing Resumption of Genocide as ‘Pressure on Hamas’ 

Image used in this post is from https://visualizingpalestine.org/visual/buying-time-for-genocide/ 

Monitoring the Rich and Powerful in Grand Rapids – Segment Three

March 28, 2025

One of the 10 principles of journalism is that it must serve as an independent monitor of power.

Now, I don’t claim to be a journalist, more of a media watchdog, but I do engage in movement media. Movement media is reporting and documenting what social movements are doing, which is what I have been trying to do with GRIID since 2009.

However, since I have been monitoring what I call the Grand Rapids Power Structure for nearly two decades, I thought I would start a new segment – Monitoring the Rich and Powerful in Grand Rapids. 

The Monitoring the Rich and Powerful in Grand Rapids segments will offer brief commentary on those who have power over others in this community. These segments will not replace my regular reporting on the Grand Rapids Power Structure, since those stories will offer more in depth writing. 

As we navigate a second Trump Administration with the likes of Elon Musk, it seems like a perfect opportunity to shed some light on rich and powerful of Grand Rapids, or to frame it the way that radical media from the 60s and 70s would do regarding the Capitalist Class, using the phrase, “up against the wall motherfucker!

  • The Grand Rapids Chamber of Commerce has recently announced that longtime DeVos political operative Greg McNeilly will be the Chair of the 2025 CEO Summit in June of this year. McNeilly has a long history with the DeVos family, including being campaign manager for Michigan gubernatorial candidate Dick DeVos in 2006, was the former CEO of the far right group Michigan Freedom Fund, has been a board member of the Betsy DeVos-created Great Lakes Education Project, is currently a board member of the Downtown Development Authority (DDA), and is the Chief Operating Officer for The Windquest Group, which is owned by Dick and Betsy DeVos. It seems like the Chamber’s CEO Summit is in good hands, since their goal is to put more money into the pockets of members of the Capitalist Class in West MI.
  • The West MI Policy Forum latest Facebook page post links to an article by one of the Executive Committee members, John Kennedy, President & CEO of Autocam Medical. Kennedy’s article is critical of Gov. Whitmer’s road repair budget proposal, which you can read here. Kennedy contrasts Whitmer’s proposal with that of Michigan House Chair Matt Hall’s plan, which Kennedy refers to as “revenue-neutral.” This is an interesting take, since Kennedy is never neutral on anything. In fact, Kennedy’s relationship with Rep. Matt Hall is anything but neutral, since Kennedy is the fourth largest campaign contributor to the Matt Hall Majority Fund, contributing $100,000.
  • Lastly, the far right Grand Rapids Think Tank, the Acton Institute, posted a recent podcast and article about the new book, Broken Altars: Secularist Violence in Modern History. The Acton Institute article is essentially saying that secular governments are worse than governments that have a strong religious historical context. The articles provides the following examples of anti-Christian regimes, such as Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot. Interestingly enough, Hitler had the support of the majority of Christian churches, especially the Catholic Church. See the book, Hitler’s Pope: The Secret History of Pius XII. While it is true that Nazi Germany, Stalin’s Russia, Mao’s China and Cambodia under Pol Pot all committed major atrocities, the Acton Institute article completely omits government atrocities committed in the West. If we look at the US alone, a country founded on genocide and slavery, we can see that the US has a long history of brutal military interventions in Latin America and often propping up dictatorship’s in that region. See the well documented book, Endless Holocausts: Mass Death in the History of the United States Empire, by David Michael Smith.  

GR City Commissioners excited to spend $20 million for a golf entertainment center in the midst of a housing crisis

March 26, 2025

Golf is a game that is primarily engaged in by white well to do businessmen who use the game to get together to make deals to carve up this country a little finer amongst themselves. George Carlin

At Tuesday’s Committee of the Whole meeting, Grand Rapids City Commissioners herd a proposal for a golf entertainment center that would cost roughly $20 million to construct. 

MLive reported on this $20 million golf entertainment center proposal and quoted two of the current Grand Rapids City Commissioners.

“Commissioner Kelsey Perdue, who represents the Third Ward where the golf course is located, said that even though it would be a costly project, it would be worth the investment if it would allow the city to grow and diversify its revenue sources.” 

“Second Ward Commissioner Milinda Ysasi called the project a “catalytic investment” that could spur economic development along the 28th Street corridor. She noted that drawing more golfers isn’t just beneficial for the city’s golf course – it would be beneficial for restaurants and other shops in the area.”

Of course it would attract people from out of town and those who make enough money to spend on this elitist game. However, when is it the job of local government to generate revenue? I thought that local government provided basic services to the community and adopted policies that would benefit the people who live here? It would appear that both Commissioners Ysasi and Perdue want the city to generate revenue. I mean, you just can’t make this shit up.

The MLive article also states that in order to pay for the $20 million cost for the golf entertainment center, “which could be paid for through a bond, and it would be completed by 2028 for the course’s 100-year anniversary.”

The MLive article also provides some insight into what the golf entertainment center would look like: 

“Marquardt described the proposed facility as a two-story building with private indoor/outdoor hitting bays that would allow players to hit balls onto a real targeted range.

Each bay would have comfortable seating, sliding glass doors and options for simulated games to allow for year-round use. There could be a restaurant and bar to serve food and drinks to visitors, Marquardt said.”

I always find it rather instructive about how governments can always find ways to use public money for projects that will primarily benefit the private sector, but then claim that we can provide single payer health care or housing for people, because how would we pay for that?

It always comes down to priorities. Golf courses and golf entertainment centers take priority over housing for individuals and families. What if the City of Grand Rapids were to issue a bond for $20 million to provide families the ability to put a $50,000 deposit on a new home? $20 million would allow 400 families the opportunity to purchase a home. 

What about renters? Let’s say for tenants who pay $1500 a month to rent, which in turn costs $18,000 a year. How many tenants could get their rent covered for a year if the City of Grand Rapids were to raise $20 million for tenants? One thousand, one hundred and 11 tenants could have their rent covered for an entire year. Imagine if that was being discussed by Grand Rapids City officials? Nope, they are talking about raising $20 million for a god damn golf entertainment center, with the expressed purpose of being “a regional tourist destination.”

19th anniversary for the largest immigrant justice march in Grand Rapids

March 26, 2025

On March 26, 2006, thousands of people marched in favor of immigrant rights today in Grand Rapids as part of ongoing organizing efforts against anti-immigrant legislation being debated by the federal government. The march, which went from Garfield Park to Calder Plaza, was the largest march in recent history, far exceeding a 2004 march for immigrant rights that was attended by more than 400 people. In Grand Rapids today, nearly 10,000 people marched in favor of immigrant rights and against legislation that would criminalize undocumented workers. Their signs read “We are ALL Immigrants,” “We do the Work,” and “We are not Terrorists.”

Starting at Garfield Park on the south side of Grand Rapids people from all over West Michigan came together from all walks of life. There were ministers, small business owners, parents, students, but most of the people who gathered today were workers. Several people I talked to said they took the day off from work, because “this issue is more important than a day’s pay.” Economics was one of the 2 main reasons that people mentioned for taking action on this issue.

A farm worker named Vicente said, “people don’t realize how important we are to the economy…..we pick the fruit, we do the work!” Teresa Hendricks from the Michigan Migrant Legal Assistance Project says that “if the current undocumented workforce was arrested the economy locally would shut down. We estimate that migrant workers generate about $10 billion annually in West Michigan.”

The other issue that people kept repeating was the fact that if the proposed legislation went through it would be “a grave injustice.” The possibility that millions of people could be jailed for nothing more than being undocumented, generated lots of angry energy at the march. The legislation in question was introduced in 2005, known as the Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act. This bill would criminalize undocumented immigrants and even punish those who offered them any assistance, including rides, housing, and food support.

During the march, people yelled, chanted, and carried hundreds of Mexican flags. Luis Beteta, head of the Catholic Church’s Hispanic Ministry office said that “this proposed legislation itself was criminal. People should never be considered illegal just because a policy says so.” When asked about people who are not directed at risk with this proposed legislation Beteta said “in Nazi Germany many people said this doesn’t concern me and look what happened. It affects all of us. We are all Immigrants.”

The march ended on Calder Plaza, where an estimated 7 – 8,000 people listened to speakers from a variety of different community organizations. Speakers highlighted the contributions of immigrants to US society, discussed HR 4437, and highlighted the continued need for legislative proposals such as the Kennedy-McCain Immigration Reform Act and the DREAM Act. Similar events were held across the country in cities such as HoustonPhoenix, and Salinas over the weekend with the largest of these rallies drawing between 500,000 and 1,000,000 people in Los Angeles.

Grand Rapids Press Coverage

The Grand Rapids Press coverage wasn’t awful, but it was limiting in what information was shared. First, the coverage does not center the voices and perspectives of the immigrant community that participated in the march. Second, the coverage focused too much on the theme of, “we are not terrorists.” Third, the coverage underestimated the numbers that turned out. The GR Press relied on the GRPD for an estimation and put it at 7,000, while organizers told me they believed it was closer to 10,000. Lastly, the GR Press coverage did not provide any larger analysis of why so many turned out for the march and how the mass turnout was replicated across the country. The lack of context also failed to acknowledge that there had been several organizing meetings in the months leading up to the march, meetings that were public with 200 – 300 each meeting.

Cosecha and GR Rapid Response to ICE once again pressure Grand Rapids City officials to declare the city a Sanctuary

March 26, 2025

Last night, several members of Movimiento Cosecha and GR Rapid Response to ICE came to the Commissioner’s night out, which was held at Union High School. 

Since it was a Commissioner’s night out, the doors opened at 5pm, where people could access city services, get information and have more formal conversations with commissioners and city staff. Movimiento Cosecha members came early to hand out information on their upcoming May Day actions, but they also brought some political theater.

Cosecha made a pinata, with the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) symbol on it and invited people to whack the ICE pinata. Ironically, even Commissioner Belchak decided to whack the ICE pinata.  Members of Movimiento Cosecha had attempted to bring the ICE pinata inside, since it was cold last night, but city workers, security and cops would not allow it. 

The regular City Commission began at 7pm and Cosecha and GR Rapid Response to ICE member were expecting to speak during the public comment at the end of the meeting, since immigration and sanctuary matters were not on the agenda. However, for some reason, the City decided that there would be no public comment at the end, thus people who attended the meeting were invited to speak during the first public comment period, even before the Commission got to their agenda.

Beginning at about 15 minutes in the video, you can hear people speak about the importance of the City of Grand Rapids adopt a sanctuary policy. In fact, most of the comments made during the public comment period centered on Grand Rapids becoming a Sanctuary City.

Movimiento Cosecha had sent out a Media Advisory earlier in the day, which I am going to include here, since it provides clear talking points about GR becoming a Sanctuary City, along with responses to previous comments from Mayor LaGrand and Comissioner Belchak.

Mayor LaGrand you said in January that being a Sanctuary City would give immigrants a “False sense of Hope”. We disagree, it would mean a concrete commitment that the City would not cooperate with ICE in the following ways: 

  • policies restricting the ability of state and local police to make arrests for federal immigration violations, or to detain individuals on civil immigration warrants;
  • policies restricting the police or other city workers from asking about immigration status;
  • policies prohibiting “287(g)” agreements through which ICE deputizes local law enforcement officers to enforce federal immigration law;
  • policies that prevent local governments from entering into a contract with the federal government to hold immigrants in detention;
  • policies preventing immigration detention centers in Grand Rapids.
  • GRPD will not arrest people who GR Rapid Response to ICE mobilizes to prevent ICE from arresting and detaining members of the immigrant community.

Adopting these policies would not give people false hope, but provide concrete acts of solidarity and support to the undocumented community. 

Commissioner Belchak said in January, when we first asked Grand Rapids to declare itself a Sanctuary that “we not have heard from people who oppose it. As of right now, we know that 3204 people to have signed on the demand that the City become a Sanctuary, while only 16 people have publicly opposed it, based on direct communication with the City of Grand Rapids since January.

Grand Rapids has also said they don’t want to lose state or federal funds by being a Sanctuary. We believe that if the State or Federal government cut funds to Grand Rapids for standing in solidarity with immigrants that 2 things would happen: 1)People would be angered and moved to action against the Federal or State government for being so petty; and 2) people would step up with funds, skills or whatever they could to make sure that people’s needs were being taken care of despite funding being withheld. In addition, the City of Grand Rapids could do what the cities of Chelsea and Somerville, Massachusetts did, which is to sue the Trump Administration for their efforts to coerce them into participating in mass deportation. 

Right after someone read these comments, people with Movimiento Cosecha and GR Rapid Response to ICE stood up and began chanting, engaging in a disruptive action, which begins at 55:40 into the video. The disruption only lasted for about 5 minutes before the Mayor called in security and GRPD to escort people out of the building.

Michigan Democrats engaged in a deceptive and performative effort last week by introducing legislation that would allow undocumented immigrants to obtain driver’s licenses

March 24, 2025

Last week, Michigan Democrats introduced a bill (HB 4195) that would allow undocumented immigrants to obtain a driver’s license. The bill did not pass, not just because Republicans voted against it, but because 6 Democrats voted against it, along with another 7 Democrats who did not even bother to vote.

All of this was nothing more than political theater, since the Democrats could have passed a previous bill that would allow undocumented immigrants to obtain a driver’s license. In fact, the Michigan Democratic Party, from Gov. Whitmer to State Senator Winnie Brinks all said that they would make sure that the bill to allow undocumented immigrants to obtain driver’s licenses would get adopted when they had a trifecta of control over state politics after the 2022 election. 

The Democrats broke this promise over and over again, as I have been documenting since 2023, despite all of the important organizing to pressure state lawmakers to pass the driver’s license bill. Here is a chronology of their actions while the Democrats controlled the State Legislature: 

Movimiento Cosecha action targets Senator Winnie Brinks in Lansing around Driver’s Licenses.

The 2023 May Day march centered the demand to win driver’s licenses for immigrants. 

Once again Movimiento Cosecha visits Sen. Brinks in Lansing without a commitment to passing legislation providing undocumented immigrants with drivers licenses

We will not be dismissed or ignored: Day one of the Cosecha Michigan encampment in Lansing

Movimiento Cosecha occupies Senator Brinks’ office in Lansing: The frightening realities for oppressed people to be told to wait

Movimiento Cosecha May Day action once again pressures State Legislators to win Driver’s Licenses, but with a new tactic

Michigan Democrats continue to ignore immigrant demands despite promises to pass the Drive Safe bills

Cosecha Michigan begins a hunger strike, while Democrats fail to keep promises and the Michigan Freedom Fund practices xenophobia

Lastly, even during the Lame Duck period in November/December of 2024, the Democrats had a chance to once again pass legislation that would give immigrants the ability to obtain a driver’s license. They failed to do so. I saw the disgust, disappointment and disbelief on the faces of the Cosecha Michigan members, because despite all of the promises from State Legislators and from Governor Whitmer’s office that they would pass the Drive SAFE bills after they won the trifecta during the 2022 election, they failed to make that promise a reality.

Proposing progressive legislation when Democrats do not have the majority is a standard approach to how they function. If they can appear to speak for the people by proposing progressive legislation, then that is what they will do. They know full well that these bills will not pass, but it provides them sufficient positive PR, which is ultimately an illusion, especially since they don’t often adopt progressive policies even when they have a majority in Congress or at the State level. 

This tactic of appearing to promote policies that their base wants, while not having a majority in Congress or at the State level, is an old tactic to appease people. However, more and more people are starting to become aware of this tactic, are seeing the deception and the betrayal around critical issues that would make a difference in people’s lives. Let’s not be fooled by the fake populism of the Democratic Party, instead we have to come to terms with the fact that they are more interested in maintaining the status quo, which means they are in no way interested in challenging systems of power and oppression.