Moral Pronouncements aren’t enough: Artprize, the DeVos Family and Trump’s Executive Orders
Yesterday, Artprize made an announcement on their website that appears to be a response to some of the recent Executive Orders coming from the Trump administration, particularly the anti-immigrant, anti-refugee and anti-Muslim policies.
Here is part of what the ArtPrize announcement stated:
ArtPrize operates according to a Mission and a set of Guiding Principles. Recently the ground shifted, and so far the policies and statements of the current administration have made what were once broadly agreeable sentiments into urgent calls to action.The ArtPrize team is committed to these principles so we’re compelled to speak out. ArtPrize opposes any efforts to:
- Discriminate against anyone based on religion, race, gender, sexual identity, physical ability or economic status.
- Detain or persecute refugees and immigrants.
- Limit or undermine a free press or freedom of speech.
- Prevent any child in the United States from accessing a quality education that includes the arts and humanities.
While such a pronouncement is nice and all, it effectively does nothing to address the reality that is faced by immigrants, refugees and Muslims, based on the recent Executive Orders.
No doubt this pronouncement is also influenced by the recent confirmation of Betsy DeVos as Secretary of Education, who is the mother of ArtPrize founder Rick DeVos. This seems evident based on the fourth point in the ArtPrize announcement, which says ; Prevent any child in the United States from accessing a quality education that includes the arts and humanities.
Show us the money!
Here are some reasons why the pronouncement is essentially meaningless.
- The US government’s negative treatment towards immigrants, refugees and Muslims is nothing new. ArtPrize first came on the scene in 2009, after the Obama administration took office. During his administration more undocumented people have been detained and deported than any previous administration. This included an escalation in the detention of families. So why now?
2. This announcement is fundamentally a PR stunt aimed to head off any potential or additional anger that might be directed at ArtPrize because of the growing animosity towards the Betsy DeVos confirmation and the increased exposure to the DeVos family history as a result of the nomination and eventual confirmation.
3. ArtPrize was founded by Rick DeVos, receives a tremendous amount from the Dick & Betsy DeVos Foundation on an annual basis, gets money from other DeVos family members and the circle of friends that they associate with, like the Seechia, Jandernoa, John Kennedy, etc. These people are all part of the West Michigan power structure that continues to support reactionary policies around labor issues, LGBTQ issues, as well as, promoting a Neoliberal Capitalist model. These people also a major contributors to the Republican Party at the state and federal level. In other words, their funding helped bring about the election of Donald trump. Therefore, unless ArtPrize is willing to stop receiving funds from these major contributors to the GOP, the announcement is essentially meaningless.
4. Lastly, the only real action that ArtPrize could take would be to work to fund the immigrant justice, pro-refugee, in Solidarity with the Muslim community and Sanctuary movements that are currently organizing in Grand Rapids. In other words, raise millions of dollars for these movements, money which we know they are capable of raising for an art competition, so that these movements can reduce the harm being done to immigrants, refugees and Muslims throughout West Michigan.
Failure to act on these four points means that the ArtPrize pronouncement is essentially meaningless.
616 Lofts Profile: The Art of Gentrification and Racism
616 Lofts is just one part of 616 Development. Founded in 2009 by Derek Coppess, the 616 Lofts mission offers the following narrative:
We build unique, urban spaces where people can work, play and just … live. 616 Lofts are residential communities built to do better for the city of Grand Rapids and its people. Our properties are in the midst of some of downtown’s most popular locations. Modern apartments (most of them upcycled from old structures) fuse historic and contemporary features, offering some of the most unique interiors in the city.
This seemingly upbeat and attractive take on what 616 Lofts does, fails to mention that the kinds of “urban spaces” they create is not for the thousands of working class families and communities of color who could never afford the monthly cost of rent required by the company.
Can you say Gentrification?
Of the seven locations the company currently has apartments available, they are all listed as “market rate.” However, market rate is essentially a term that is synonymous with unaffordable. Here are the locations and the cost(s) that come with living in 616 Lofts:
- Michigan Lofts: $1,100 – $2,300

- Alabama Lofts: $900 – $1,950
- Monroe Lofts: $925 – $2,400
- Prospect Lofts: $800 – $1,800
- Kendall Lofts: $950 – $1,700
- Ionia Lofts: $1,100 – $2,700
- Pearl St. Lofts: $1,000 – $1,600
Someone making $10 an hour, which is the reality for thousands of people in the Grand Rapids area, equals $22,400 a year. This makes none of the 616 Lofts affordable for this entire population. Even someone making $15 an hour ($31,200 a year) would have a hard time affording most of the 616 Lofts, especially after factoring in utilities, transportation, health care, food, etc.
In addition, many of the 616 Lofts projects contribute to the gentrification of Grand Rapids. This is particularly the case with the 616 Lofts that were created on Michigan, Prospect and on the westside, on Alabama Street. These neighborhoods have historically been working class neighborhoods that have seen drastic changes as a result of the various development projects that have taken over. With each new development project, property values go up, which increases the rent, resulting in working class individuals and families being displaced because those neighborhoods are no longer affordable.
There is a new project by 616 Lofts that will be on Plainfield NE, in the Creston neighborhood. This forthcoming project will also contribute to the ongoing gentrification of that traditionally working class neighborhood, which has seen new breweries, restaurants and an upscaling of a long-standing party store in recent years.
On top of the cost of 616 Lofts and their contribution to gentrification in Grand Rapids, it is worth looking at the kind of culture they promote.
One can get a sense of the kind of culture that are promoting by reading the 616 Lofts blog. The blog postings are about where to find the best breweries, coffee shops, restaurants or where the best boutique stores are. You’ll find articles on exploring the night life and attending yoga class or you might find a piece about celebrating the holidays or where you can volunteer in town. In other words, the 616 Lofts are promoting a more professional, upscale, creative class culture that is highly privileged and disproportionately white.
In looking at the images of people that are used on their site, the mostly present white people. Even in their cute, upbeat video about how the company came to be, everyone is white.
What is also offensive about this culture, is that the staff are referred to as “the tribe.” Ironically, the staff at 616 Lofts is all white. The company is also hiring and they invite people to “Join the tribe.” It is not ok for people or businesses to use this kind of language, language that is racist and appropriates from other cultures.
Grand Rapids is a city that is becoming stratified in terms of class and race. More and more of the development projects are forcing working class people and communities of color out of neighborhoods. We can ill afford to be unaware of these dynamics and need to begin to name the forces responsible for these dynamics. 616 Lofts is not the only business perpetuating gentrification and racism, but they are one of them.
In the next several weeks we will take a look at companies that are in the businesses of creating new housing and what role they play in the gentrification of Grand Rapids.
There is a new zine that people in Michigan have put together and are distributing at protests that have been organized since the election in November.
The zine is entitled, Whatever You Do, Don’t Talk to the Police. Sprout Distro is making the zine available on their site, in PDF form. Here is what Sprout Distro has to say about the zine:
It’s a basic introduction for folks coming into contact with police and other law enforcement officials in the context of political demonstrations. It focuses on the importance of avoiding interactions with the police, looking out for each other, and taking care of each other. The zine explains how police often sew the seeds of division within resistance movements and instead articulates the importance of building a “culture of resistance” wherein folks respect a diversity of approaches by agreeing not to cooperate with the police.
Last year we offered a class on the history of policing in the US, using Kristian Williams book, Our Enemies in Blue: Police and Power in America, for those wanting to dig deeper into the history, function and purpose of policing in the US.
More Right Wing money gets behind Betsy DeVos nomination for Secretary of Education in Ad Campaigns
Yesterday, the watchdog organization, the Center for Public Integrity noted that two conservative non-profit organizations are spending lots of money to run ad campaigns in states with Senators who haven’t as yet completely committed to voting for DeVos.
The two groups are Club for Growth and America Next. Founded in 1999, Club for Growth has focused much of their energy around economic issues, such as taxes and pushing a pro-capitalism agenda. Club for Growth has also aggressively back candidates running for federal office, candidates like West Michigan’s Justin Amash.
According to the Club for Growth website, under the heading, We Are Determined to see Betsy DeVos win confirmation, it states:
The Club for Growth released the following statement from its president, David McIntosh, about its new television ad supporting the nomination of Betsy DeVos as Secretary of Education:
“The Club for Growth enthusiastically endorsed Betsy DeVos when President Trump nominated her in December, and we are determined to see her win confirmation,” said Club for Growth president David McIntosh. “We expected the union-backed liberals to oppose her, but it’s especially troubling to see Senators in conservative states who are wavering on her nomination because of union pressure. We’re running these ads to make sure constituents understand what’s at stake in this nomination battle.”
The Club for Growth is airing TV ads in North Dakota and West Virginia, urging constituents to call their Senator about the DeVos nomination.
Here is an ad that Club for Growth is running.
America Next is an organization much newer to partisan politics. Founded in 2015, America Next was started by long-time Republican Bobby Jindal and seeks to influence the federal policy in four main areas: Education, Defense, Energy and Health Care.
In reading the platform they have for Education Policy, one can see why they are spending money to get Betsy DeVos nominated. The 44 page Education Policy report is a public educator’s worst nightmare.
Here is the ad campaign that America First is running to get Betsy DeVos nominated as Education Secretary.
The Center for Public Integrity article also states:
The Club for Growth and America Next both didn’t respond to a request for comment from the Center for Public Integrity. Club for Growth is also running digital ads on Twitter and on websites such as National Review. The 45Committee, another conservative nonprofit whose sister super PAC supported Trump during the 2016 election, has also released a pro-DeVos web promotion.
We Don’t Need a Permit to Resist: 2nd Week of Protests at the Kent County Airport in Solidarity with Muslims, Immigrants and Refugees
For the second week in a row, a good-sized crowd turned out to say no the President’s Executive Order that would restrict and ban certain refugees, immigrants and Muslims from coming into the US.
An estimated 300 people showed up at the Kent County Airport yesterday to resist the Federal government’s policy. This was about half as many people who came out last Sunday.
The amount of people wasn’t the only difference at yesterday’s protest. The police presence was significantly larger that what was there last week, especially early on. There were nearly 20 police vehicles patrolling throughout the 2 hours the protest lasted, with law enforcement from the airport security, the Kent County Sheriff’s Department, the Grand Rapids Police Department and the Michigan State Police.
The same designated protest area was created, like last week, but most people refused to go to that space, instead, people initially gathered near the entrance to the airport. After about 30 minutes, the crowd began marching pasted the designated protest area and marched down one road that eventually led to the terminal. The police kept scrambling to keep up, since they were unaware of where the protest was going.
Once people arrived at the airport terminal, it became evident that the airport security and other law enforcement agencies were going to manage those marching, especially if they decided to block all four lanes in front of the terminal, like what had been done the week before. The airport had wooden barricades lined up along the sidewalk, just in case they needed to contain people. The police were also preventing people from blocking all roads in front of the terminal and from entering the terminal itself.
Permits and the Policing of Dissent
Part of the reason why there was such a large police presence at the airport before and during the protest, had to do with the fact that people with the local Democratic Party had once again contacted the airport asking for permission to protest. Those with Michigan’s Third Democratic Congressional District had created their own protest, which they then cancelled, but not before attempting to pressure the autonomous protest organizers to comply with the wishes of the airport authority.
In a message sent to those who organized the autonomous protest, here is what Traci Kornak wrote:
- See the attached permit.

- See the rules and liability for damage or breaking the rules.
- Someone from the group will need to sign.
- We have obtained a permit but will not go forward until the groups that are online who want to interfere and disrupt the airport operations are in agreement. Last weekend there was no damage but the disruption at the terminal delayed flights.
- This is private property and there is no right to assemble anywhere but the easement at the front of the property on Patterson.
- We do not want to distract attention from the cause.
There were other messages sent attempting to pressure people to comply with the permit agreement. In one message, the people associated with the local Democrats said, This permit needs to be signed if the protest is going to go forward.
If people want to get permission to protest, they certainly can do that, but those who chose to should never tell other people that they need permission to resist or dissent.
Muslim, Refugee and Immigrant Voices
One positive thing that this writer witnessed was that there was a larger contingent of those from the refugee, immigrant and Muslim communities present during yesterday’s march. People from Latin America, African and the Middle East were visible and vocal during the protest that began in front of the airport entrance, all the way to the terminal.
This writer spoke with several people who identified as Muslim and who were from countries like Somalia that came out to voice their opposition to the Executive Order that would ban or limit people coming from certain countries. One young woman said to me, “It is important to be here to voice our opposition to this injustice, to this policy. We all need to take a stand. We are grateful that other people are willing to be here and to stand in support of our rights.”
Start Garden adds Ethnic Diversity, but offers same old Capitalist opportunities for the few
Last Thursday, the DeVos-owned project known as Start Garden, headed by Betsy DeVos’ son Rick DeVos, announced they would be hiring two new people in order to promote more minority business opportunities in Grand Rapids.
Start Garden hired Darel Ross, former co-executive director of Linc and Jorge Gonzalez who has been executive director of the West Michigan Hispanic Chamber of Commerce since March 2015.
The Start Garden Press Release, in part stated:
The vitality and future of our entrepreneurial ecosystem, however, requires local leaders in economic development with deep knowledge of the disparities and challenges faced in diverse entrepreneur communities. This helps ensure that the economic benefits of entrepreneurship can be realized by people of all backgrounds and experience.
On Monday, MLive reported on this new announcement from Start Garden, wherein Ross and Gonzalez said, “they are looking forward to having the additional resources to remove barriers to entrepreneurship across the board.”
The MLive article also mentions the 2015 Forbes ranking that put Grand Rapids the worst city in the US in terms of Blacks economic well being. The above comments from Ross and Gonzalez suggest their addition to the Start Garden staff will somehow be able improve minority businesses opportunities in Grand Rapids.
We don’t doubt that Start Garden will be able to increase the number of minority owned businesses in Grand Rapids, but the Forbes article from 2015 wasn’t just talking about minority owned businesses, it was talking about the average income of Black households. The Forbes article stated that Black median household income was only 59% of what White median household income is.
Hiring two economic development leaders from minority communities was certainly a smart move by Start Garden. It adds lots of PR value to the organization. However, Black Capitalism, like White Capitalism, will only benefit a small percentage of people in the black community and will NOT do much of anything to alleviate the deep poverty that thousands of black families find themselves experiencing in Grand Rapids. An important historical analysis of how capitalism will not benefit the mass of black working class families can be found in Manning Marable’s book, How Capitalism Underdeveloped Black America.
Hiring Gonzalez makes sense considering his leadership in the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, but Ross’s hiring may not seem quite as clear. However, when one considers that the largest funders to Linc have been members of the DeVos family.
According to the most recent 990s from the Doug and Pamela DeVos Foundation, between 2012 and 2014, that foundation provided roughly $3.2 million dollars to Linc. This is because the organization’s primary function is economic development.
Public money for Private gain
The MLive article also states:
The new focus by Start Garden comes as the organization is completing a year-long restructuring to take over managing Grand Rapids SmartZone. Overseeing SmartZone gives Start Garden an opportunity to take advantage of state and federal economic develop dollars to work with more businesses.
As we reported in September https://griid.org/2016/09/20/who-knew-the-city-of-grand-rapids-is-giving-taxpayers-money-to-a-devos-owned-business/, Start Garden (by March of 2017) will receive $725,000 of taxpayer funds from the City of Grand Rapids to run the SmartZones program.
We are beginning to see the repressive policies that the new administration is beginning to implement. From the push to further militarize the US border with Mexico to the ban on Muslims coming from select countries.
In writing about the Kent County Airport Action in support of Immigrants, Refugees and Muslims this past Sunday, I mentioned that someone with the Democratic Party attempted to co-op the action by; 1) meeting with airport authorities to create a protest zone on their own and ; 2) by attempting to police the behavior of those marching in the road. 
This type of cooptation is not new, but it is something that those of us who seek justice should be aware of and work to counter its affects.
Radical and autonomous social movements have always been impacted by elements attempting to coop their agenda and goals. In Lance Selfa’s important book, The Democrats: A Critical History, he devotes a whole chapter (chapter 4) on how the Democratic Party has coopted social movements in the 20th century.
Other writers, such as John Stauber, have focused on partisan front groups like MoveOn, which have played a major role in coopting social movements since early 2003. One example that Stauber has documented was during the US occupation of Iraq and how MoveOn was really not calling for an end of the war/occupation.
One last example worth mentioning is what the Democrats did during the Occupy Wall Street movement, by coopting the language and vision of what that movement was attempting to accomplish in cities all across the country.
Let’s face it, political parties are interested in gaining power through elections. When political parties have power, they want to maintain it, when they don’t have power, they want to regain it.
A current effort to co-opt the growing forces against the Trump administration policies has shown up in West Michigan in recent weeks. The Facebook group calls themselves Indivisible West Michigan.
Indivisible West Michigan is one of many chapters across the US that is using a guide called, Indivisible: A Practical Guide for Resisting the Trump Agenda. This guide is essentially a mechanism to try to engage elected officials by crafting messages, meeting with members of Congress, co-ordinating phone call campaigns and setting up Town Hall meetings. While these things aren’t necessary bad, what the Invisible guide is suggesting is that we just need to be better organized so we can convince members of Congress to do the right thing. This comes as no surprise, since the entire guide was written by former Congressional staffers.
This is not to say that the tactic of attempting to move elected officials on social policy is completely useless, but if we really want to look at tactics and strategies that will actually resist the policies of the US government, attempting to lobby Congress is an extremely weak tactic.
Looking at the former Congressional staffers who actually put together the Indivisible Guide should also tell us something about what it is they want for the future.
Ezra Levin – Ezra works for the Corporation for Enterprise Development (CFED) as an Associate Director of Government Affairs. The CFED’s mission states in part, “We scale innovative practical solutions that empower low- and moderate-income people to build wealth.” Their Institutional Funders reads like a who’s who of corporate America, with companies like Chase Bank, Cargill, Charles Schwab and Wells Fargo.
Leah Greenberg – Leah is an investments manager with Humanity United. Humanity United’s vision page has lots of nice words and uses images of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Nelson Mandela, but it was founded by one of the wealthiest men on the planet, the founder of ebay, Pierre Omidyar.
Angel Padilla – Angel works with the National Immigration Law Center, specifically as a Health Policy Analyst.
Sarah Dohl – Sarah is currently the Vice President of Communications for Junior Achievement.
Matthew Traldi – Matthew is the Research Team Director for the SEIU – the Service Employees International Union. The SEIU has a long history of allegiance to the Democratic Party.
The profiles of these individuals don’t exactly inspire the kind of movements we need to resist the current government agenda.
The Need for Autonomous and Independent Movements
Throughout US history, grassroots social justice movements that have been effective, have primarily remained autonomous from partisan politics. Think of the Abolitionist movement, the radical labor movement of the late 19th and early 20th century, the Black Freedom movement and movements like the American Indian Movement or the South African Anti-Apartheid movement. These movements were effective, in large part, because of their autonomy from partisan politics and their use of strategies that relied on direct action and pre-figurative politics.
We are in a moment right now that needs independent and autonomous movements, movements that are not swayed by partisan politics or the influences of money. These independent and autonomous movements should be centered around the
struggles of people who are the most vulnerable in this society. We need to look to the Black Lives Matter movement, the Idol No More movement, the immigrant rights movement, the various movements for economic justice and anti-capitalist movements, the BDS movement, the new Sanctuary movement and the climate justice movement.
With these existing movements and whatever new ones will be created we can build power from below that does not rely on existing systems of power and oppression and actually resist the current government agenda.
















