An opportunity to promote a living wage campaign in Grand Rapids and other economic justices demands
There is proposed legislation in Lansing right now, legislation that would lift the ban on what is now referred to as the Local Government Labor Regulatory Limitation Act. According to an analysis of Senate Bill 0171:
The Local Government Labor Regulatory Limitation Act, prohibits a local governmental body from regulating the employment relationship between a nonpublic employer and its employees. Among other prohibitions in the Act, a local governmental body may not require an employer to pay an employee a wage higher than the State minimum hourly wage or other fringe benefits, regulate strike activity, or regulate an employer’s hours or scheduling of employees.
If Senate Bill 0171 were to be adopted it would provide greater opportunities for workers and the communities they live in to earn higher wages, have better benefits and allow workers to engage in more militant strikes, moving from symbolic picketing to wildcat strikes.
Of course, there are organizations within the State of Michigan that are opposing this legislation, along with several groups from West Michigan. The Michigan Chamber of Commerce crafted a letter opposing SB 0171, with dozens of organizations signing on to the letter. Among those groups that are from West Michigan, are the Grand Rapids Chamber of Commerce and the West Michigan Policy Forum.
The West Michigan Policy Forum released their own statement on why SB 0171 should be opposed, with the claim that, “ life will get more expensive, and jobs will disappear across our state.”
Similar legislation was proposed in the State House of Representatives back in March. However, the State House version of the proposal hasn’t received the same kind of attention as the Senate version of the bill.
An opportunity to adopt living wage standards
If SB 0171 and HB 4237 were to be adopted, it would merely lift the ban on these critical labor issues. However, the real work would be at the municipal level, which could then make decisions on adopting living wages and other more radical labor demands.
One way to think about this, as it relates to wages in Grand Rapids, is to think about what it costs for people to rent in this city currently. According to the National Low Income Housing Coalition, for the average person in Grand Rapids to afford rent in this city, they would need to earn an hourly wage of $25.50, for 40 hours. Therefore, a minimum wage for Grand Rapids should be $25.50 an hour, but a living wage should probably be $30 – $35 an hour.
If Grand Rapids is organized and people can create an economic justice working group to make this kind of a demand around wages, along with other demands for workers, then the proposed legislation would be a good thing. You can bet that the Grand Rapids Chamber of Commerce and other members of the Capitalist Class will oppose such things, plus they already have a cozy relationship with Grand Rapids City officials, so it will definitely be a fight to win economic justice policies and a living wage campaign in Grand Rapids.
However, it should be noted that throughout history, that battles over wages and other economic justice benefits have come about because of struggles won by labor unions and other economic justice centered groups. In fact, improved wages and benefits have always been won by campaigns organized by working class people. Even if the proposed legislation does not get adopted, workers can get organized in any sector to make demands and win economic justice battles for their families and communities.
Community Coffee Hours with Elected Officials: Creating road blocks for real community engagement
About 10 years ago now, a dozen activists decided to show up at the Rainbow Grill in Grandville to talk with a Conservative State Representative about LGBTQ and Immigration issues.
The Conservative State Representative had been using this spot for years to fulfill his community engagement obligations. However, on one Saturday morning he got more than he bargained for, when 12 activists, sat down with him in a restaurant booth (2 at a time) to confront him on his stance on numerous issues. This State Representative did not stick around to meet with all 12, since he was only there for an hour, so the activists followed him out to his car to continue to share with him their thoughts and feelings about his voting record. 
This lesson taught me that elected officials don’t really like to engage with the community, especially if they don’t get to determine how engagement will happen.I’ve thought about this a great deal more recently, since there have been several instances where Movimiento Cosecha has attempted to talk with State Senator Winnie Brinks, but were told by her staff that she was not available. A similar interaction was had by a continent of housing justice activists who attended the Rent is Too Damn Hight rally in Lansing on September 5th. In this instance, the staffers in Senator Brink’s office had locked the doors and were unwilling to meet with housing justice activists.
I attended a recent Community Owns Safety Coalition meeting in Grand Rapids, where we talked about the Rent is Too Damn High Rally and inability to meet with Senator Brinks that day. We talked about trying to meet with State elected officials when they host coffee hours in Grand Rapids. This tactic was decided upon, since not everyone has the ability to just take off work and go to Lansing during the week to meet with elected officials. The other reason is that there are several proposed state bills that housing justice activists would like to see get passed and meeting with elected officials in Grand Rapids would be more accessible for many people.
Community Coffee Hours
The Community Owns Safety Coalition meeting I mentioned earlier was this past Wednesday, so later that night I wanted to find out which State Representatives and Senators would be hosting their next community coffee hours. I was able to find several upcoming community coffee sessions, but most of them were happening on Friday, September 29th.
Being that these meetings were happening in less than 48 hours, it would make it difficult to mobilize people to attend, with such short notice. In addition, all of the community coffee hours I came across for September 29 were during the day, which also meant that if you work 1st Shift, you would not be able to attend. Another aspect of these opportunities to tell state elected officials what was on your mind is that they generally only lasted for 1 hour, which really limits how much time you have to talk about specific legislation or the issues that you want addressed.
There was one other major road block that one of the housing justice people I know encountered, specifically with a community coffee hour with State Rep. Skaggs and State Senator Brinks. They too were hosting a meeting for 1 hour – from 10:15 – 11:15am, on Friday, September 29th. However, they were not including the location of where the event was being held. Instead, they had this link for people to fill out. One of the housing justice activists I know filled it out on Thursday when they found out about the meeting, but didn’t receive a response until 8 hours after the meeting had already been held.
The housing activists then sent a message to a staff member for State Rep. Skaggs stating,
“You sent the information on the location of the Community Coffee Hour for Rep Skaggs and Sen. Brinks 8 hours after it happened. I submitted the information on Thursday, which would have been ample time to receive information on the location, so I am puzzled as to why you would send this information out after the fact. In addition, why is it that you do not post the information on the location on social media, like Facebook? That is where I found out about the coffee hour. Why make people jump hoops to get information on the location?”
Here is the response the activist received back from Rep. Skagg’s staffer:
“I am sorry that the email did not deliver to you until after the event. I very confused as to how that happened as I sent out all emails regarding the location early this morning at the latest. I understand that is extremely frustrating and unprofessional. If you have concerns or questions for Representative Skaggs, I would be happy to relay them to him or set up a meeting for you to chat. As for withholding the location of the coffee hour, that was not our office’s choice. Because we were hosting with Senate Majority Leader Winnie Brinks, we had to follow her office’s security procedures which required people to register before receiving the location.”
Ok, so why does Senator Brinks have security procedures when it comes to meting people in her district? This makes me suspicious that the housing justice activists not receiving information on the location of the meeting as a mistake, but that they didn’t want them to attend.
The text included with the Facebook event for the meeting with Rep. Skaggs and Senator Brinks states in part – These coffee hours are a great chance for us to hear directly from you about how we can best represent you in the capitol. Really? It seems that if elected officials really want to hear from the public about how best to represent the communities they represent, then they would hold community meetings more frequently, at various times to allow more people to participate, and to stop making people jump through hoops to even find out where they can meet with elected officials. Elected officials are constantly telling us that they work for us, but the limited opportunities to even have a face to face conversation with them in the districts they claim to serve, make it difficult for this writer to believe their commitment to community engagement.
GRIID is offering presentations and classes on A People’s History of Grand Rapids for organizations, congregations, classrooms and book clubs
It has been 6 months since the publication of my book, A People’s History of Grand Rapids. Book sales continue to be strong and I have two conference presentations coming up, along with a talk at the local Pax Christi meeting in October.
If your organization, your congregation, non-profit or classroom is interested in having me come and to talk about A People’s History of Grand Rapids, there are several ways that that can happen.
First, I can do a one time presentation or have an informal conversation with any group that just wants to spend 1 – 2 hours talking about the book, why I decided to write it and how I went about doing research for A People’s History of Grand Rapids.
Secondly, I can do shortened class discussion with people who want to read the book, but discuss it with a group. A shortened class could be 2, 3 or 4 sessions, where people could either read the entire book and discuss during those session, or they could chose certain chapters to read and discuss.
A third option would be to do a full length GRIID Class using A People’s History of Grand Rapids. Full length classes through GRIID are usually 2 hour class for 8 weeks, but since there are 10 chapters, I would be open to doing a 10 week class.
All of this is negotiable, in terms of the length of a one time presentation, a shortened class version or a full length GRIID class. I can also do the classes virtually, if people want to have a book discussion remotely.
To book a presentation, an informal conversation, or a class for your organization or classroom, send an Email to sjeff987@gmail.com. The cost for any of these options is negotiable.
Lastly, if you don’t have a copy of the book, I still have some to sell or you can purchase them through Schuler Books. In addition, I also have A People’s History of Grand Rapids in PDF form, which you can also purchase by requesting a PDF copy. Just send an Email to Jeff Smith at sjeff987@gmail.com.
GRIID will be organizing a virtual class beginning in January of 2024, a class that will probably be held on Monday nights.
What are we really celebrating with the Top 25 Most Influential Latinos in West Michigan?
Recently, the publication Vive Michigan, just published their list of the Top 25 Most Influential Latinos in Michigan. I’m assuming the online bilingual magazine means influential Latinos in West Michigan, since this is where the publication gets distributed and all of the Latinos listed are from West Michigan.
When I saw this list, like most lists of “important” or influential people, it rubbed me the wrong way. Having said that, please don’t think that I am suggesting that those listed as the Top 25 Most Influential Latinos don’t do any good. I believe that good/bad dichotomies make things too simple, they don’t allow for complexity and they certainly don’t address structural issues or systems of power.
Then there is the question of how these 25 people were chosen. Vive Michigan says that those chosen were, “Curated meticulously through a comprehensive selection process from more than 600 nominations, this inaugural list serves as a spotlight on the individuals who are redefining what it means to be influential in West Michigan.” Ok, so curated by whom and who was involved in the nominating process? Were those Latinos who pick our food, work in the kitchens and change the bedding at hotels consulted or invited to nominate people? It seems unlikely, which means that the process is deeply flawed.
More importantly, those who were nominated are certainly people who would be considered as part of the business class or the professional class. It seems to be from my count that those who own or manage businesses at the majority of the 25 Most Influential Latinos in West Michigan, followed by people in positions of power – lawyers, judges and elected officials. There were a few on the list that work in the non-profit sector as well.
Over the past few years, GRIID has critiqued the Top 200 Most Powerful Business Leaders in West Michigan, which does include a few Black and Latino professionals. In that analysis, we make it clear that the list represents people who make up the local power structure or those that don’t do anything to challenge it. In many ways, I think the same thing about the list of the 25 Most Influential Latinos in West Michigan. But to be more specific, here are a few questions that we might ask ourselves when we look at this list.
- Are the people on this list in any way at all a threat to systems of power, privilege and oppression in West Michigan?
- Of the people who are on this list, have they internalized the values of the systems of power, privilege and oppression in West Michigan?
- Do those on this list act as a buffer against grassroots organizing in the Latino community to challenge systems of power, privilege and oppression?
- Are those on the list challenging or working to dismantle the structural racism and White Supremacist systems that prevent Latinos from living a good life?
- Are those on the list fighting with the immigrant justice movement in West Michigan to win Drivers Licenses for undocumented people?
- Are those on the list doing the important work to prevent or challenge the harm being done to Latino immigrants that are being targeted by Immigration, Customs and Enforcement (ICE) agents to arrest, detain and deport Latinos?
- Are those on the list working to make sure that all Latinos can afford a safe home to live in and to keep their children from experiencing poverty?
- Are those on the list fighting to make sure that all Latinos make a living wage, especially those who are migrant workers and those in the service industries?
Unfortunately, these are not the kinds of questions that Vive Michigan was asking. Instead, it seems that what Vive Michigan is essentially doing is mimicking the same type of celebrity peddling that the Grand Rapids Business Journal (Now Crain’s Grand Rapids) has done and will continue to do. In fact, there are two people in the Top 200 Most Powerful people list that are also on the Top 25 Most Influential Latinos list. It seems that what we are celebrating with the Top 25 Most Influential Latinos is celebrating those who don’t want to disrupt business as usual or the status quo.
Who doesn’t support paid family and medical leave in Michigan? The West Michigan Policy Forum
In May, Senate Bill 332 was introduced, legislation that would provide paid family and medical leave. In a September 6th statement from Governor Whitmer’s office, it states:
Too many Michiganders cannot be there for their families without sacrificing a paycheck. No one should have to choose between their health, their newborn, or a sick relative and paying the bills and putting food on the table.
In May, the proposed legislation went to the Housing and Human Services Committee, but there has been no public hearing on the matter as of yet, thus it remains in that committee.
In Whitmer’s address to state lawmakers in late August, the Governor had this to say about the paid family and medical leave bill:
“It helps workers be there for their families. It gives you breathing room to get better when you’re sick, to bond with your baby or care for a family member. Right now, 77% of Michigan workers do not have access to paid family, medical leave.”
The Michigan Chamber of Commerce has come out against the proposed legislation, which is consistent with their position on anything that would benefit workers. You can read their position on the issue here, then click on SB 332.
One of the organizations that makes up the Grand Rapids Power Structure has taken notice of SB 332, and has posted 3 articles within the past week alone. The West Michigan Policy Forum (WMPF), which is the leading right wing organization in West Michigan on public policy in Michigan.
In the first article from the WMPF, they are making an old argument, which says that the proposed legislation will negatively impact small businesses. This is one of the oldest and most common arguments from groups like the Chamber of Commerce and the West MI Policy Forum. The reality is that these entities don’t really care about small businesses, which have virtually no representation on their boards. Also, what were these pro-businesses doing to help prevent small businesses from going under during the peak of the COVID pandemic?
In a second article on the West Michigan Policy Forum’s website, they are making the argument that it will negatively hurt the working families around the issue of taxes. This article says nothing about how the current tax policies in Michigan overwhelmingly benefit the business class over workers, plus they don’t acknowledge that one of the first priorities of the West Michigan Policy Forum was to eliminate the business tax back in 2011.
The third, and final article, features WMPF’s Board Chair John Kennedy, who argues that if SB 332 were to be adopted that it “would be disastrous” for Michigan. What Kennedy really means is that SB 332 would likely increase taxes on Michigan businesses and allow for greater flexibility for when people can take family and medical leave. All of this would of course be beneficial for workers and their families, which people like Autocam Medical’s CEO John Kennedy doesn’t make a priority.
What is important to note about John Kennedy and other members of the West Michigan Policy Forum is their consistent commitment to putting profits over workers, their role in the interlocking systems of power in Grand Rapids and their significant campaign contributions to Republican candidates and incumbents, all of which support their policy platforms that line up with the WMPF vision – like Right to Work, undermining Public Education, attacking public sector unions, increasing austerity measures in state policies and supporting tax policies that benefit those with the most wealth. This is just one of the many reasons why those who identify as being part of the left or even progressives, should not ignore what groups like the West Michigan Policy Forum are doing.
A negative view of Christianity, legalized pot and people’s lack of faith in institutions is why America is in chaos, claims Doug DeVos’ podcast guest
It has been about 10 months since I last posted about Doug DeVos’s podcast called Believe!. In the podcast, DeVos interview former US Vice President and Presidential Candidate in 2024, Mike Pence. In true Orwellian fashion, DeVos and Pence were both talking about “leadership.”
There have only been five new podcasts in the past 10 months, but you have to remember that Doug DeVos is very busy figuring out ways to continue to expand his family’s wealth.
In today’s post, I want to talk about one of the more recent podcast from September 6th, with Aaron Renn as the guest. Renn used to be a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research. The Manhattan Institute for Policy Research is a far right think tank that was founded by Reagan’s CIA Director, William Casey. Like most far right think tanks, the Manhattan Institute opposed Critical Race Theory, LGBTQ equality, was a big supporter of the US War on Terrorism, plays a significant role in denying Climate Change and is a member of the American Legislative Exchange Council. However, the think tank’s bread and butter is to promote free market capitalism.
Since Renn left Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, he joined the more Christian-focused organization known as American Reformer. As an example of where the American Reformer is coming from, here is an excerpt from their most recent article about 10 days ago, entitled, Manning the cultural ramparts. Here is the first paragraph in that article:
Despite the lawlessness, violence, and anarchy that was unleashed by Floyd’s death, America did not fundamentally change on that day. What had been there under the surface for quite some time, however, was revealed in all of its ferocious malice. May 25th, 2020 was, as it were, the storming of the Bastille of the American left’s cultural revolution. It is a revolution still underway, though there are some encouraging signs that a counter-revolution has begun.
Apparently, the problem all along has been the American left, not the cops, not structural racism, not debilitating poverty of the corruption that permeates electoral politics.
The topic of discussion between Renn and Doug DeVos is, When Did The World Start Going Crazy? In the synopsis that is provided about the show it states:
Aaron Renn blames the 1960s. That’s when traditional morality began to decline, going from a positive thing to a neutral thing in people’s lives. Now the situation is even worse: morality is largely viewed in a negative light – with disastrous effects on people’s health and happiness.
Here are some of the main comments in the discussion and my responses.
- Christianity used to be the norm and Christian morality was the dominant view in the country. Now, Christianity is viewed negatively. I would argue that Christianity as an institution began to be more questioned and rightfully so. More importantly, the dominance of Christian values in the US is still very present, particularly in major institutions.
- People who identify as Christians in a public way are marginalized or stigmatized. Renn doesn’t really provide concrete evidence to support this claim. My experience as someone who used to identify with Christianity and then rejected it, is that, particularly in West Michigan, in most circles, cultural, social, etc. is that being outwardly Christian does not marginalize you, it makes you part of the club. I work at Hope Network, which is a Christian non-profit. I don’t know how many times that when people ask me something about myself and I talk about the years I spent in Latin America, they just assumed I was doing missionary work. My response used to be I did human rights work, but now I say, I was actually doing work that was anti-missionary work. See my documentary, Reversing the Missionary Position: Learning Solidarity on Mayan Time.
- Doug DeVos asks what are the implications for us today with a country that is falling apart? Some of Renn’s response was that there are too many single moms or that marriage rates are falling. And of course, he thinks that this has a great deal to do with the “decline of Christianity.” Renn only offers antidotes, without any real analysis.
- At about 38 minutes into the conversation, Doug DeVos raises the question of “why am I here?” DeVos then says that if people don’t have faith, then how can they cope in the world or feel like they have meaning. This observation really struck me as a very infantile view of the world and of one’s self. Again, my experience is just the opposition. When I no longer identified with Christianity (or any spiritual tradition) I began to be even more fully human and the world was a much more interesting and exiting place.
- At around 45 minutes in DeVos and Renn began to talk about immigration, sort of the Ellis Island dynamic, where the country became more tolerant. I would suggest that there is a much different narrative about new immigrants, a narrative that is presented in the book, American Intolerance: Our Dark History of Demonizing Immigrants.
- DeVos then wants Renn to talk about Grand Rapids, even though Renn is not from here. This hasn’t stopped Renn from talking about Grand Rapids, as he does in an article from 2018 in the online publication City Journal, entitled, Manufacturing a Comeback, Grand Rapids has become a midwestern economic star and is generating new industrial jobs. This article is essentially looking at Grand Rapids through a pro-business lens, where the DeVos and Van Andel families are thought of as gods.
- At 54 minutes into the conversation, Renn then decides to gush about the DeVos family, saying that they are deeply rooted in this community. Renn uses the example of when Calvin had a new President come in and wanted to do a capital campaign to get rid of a $25 million debt. He said the Calvin President was able to raise the money in 8 months, where people with money came forward and didn’t want their name on a building. First, the effort was to pay off a debt, not to build a new building. Second, most of the names of buildings on Calvin’s campus has the name of particular religious families with very deep pockets.
Like all of Doug DeVos’s guests, Renn provided little analysis, made vague claims about what’s wrong with this country and blamed it on the lack of Christianity in society. And like all guests, Renn did not want to speak ill about the US, but he did heap a great deal of praise on free market capitalism, something that made Doug DeVos very happy.
Purchasing naming rights and following the legacy of the DeVos & Van Andel families: Acrisure and the primacy of free market capitalism in Grand Rapids
On Friday, it was announced by all of the area commercial news sources that Acrisure had purchased the naming rights for the downtown outdoor amphitheater. Grand Rapids Mayor, Rosalynn Bliss gushed over the announcement, saying on Facebook, “Super excited about this announcement today and the progress we are making on the amphitheater! We are so fortunate that Acrisure calls Grand Rapids home.”
The announcement was made at the Grand Rapids Downtown Market, which makes complete sense, since the market, like the new amphitheater, used mostly public money for a facility that primarily catered to business class interests.
Acrisure purchased the naming rights for the new amphitheater for $30 million. To put this into perspective:
- The City Affordable Housing Fund is currently $17.5 Million.
- Acrisure is currently valued at $25 Billion, which means that purchasing the naming rights at $30 million is like most of us contributing $20 and then getting our name on a building.
- When Acrisure moved their headquarters to Grand Rapids, they were provided $7 million in economic incentives.
- The $30 Million from Acrisure for naming rights for the outdoor amphitheater is equal to the cost of rent for a year for 1,042 families, if those families monthly rental fees were $2000.
Following the legacy of Grand Rapids Oligarchs
In a separate MLive story related to the Acrisure naming rights purchase, the reported shared the following from the company’s CEO Greg Williams:
During Friday’s event, Williams paid tribute to the DeVos and Van Andel families, saying he’s learned from their history of community involvement and philanthropy.
“At the end of the day, we’re just following the lead that you and your families had established years ago,” he said, addressing members of the two families. “I’ve learned from what you’ve done, and I think this community obviously has been a huge benefactor. Hopefully, Acrisure can continue that role and play a role in some of those things going forward.”
Such a statement is rather instructive. If we are to be honest about what the DeVos and Van Andel families have done with their money over the years, what their legacies are, then we can draw some conclusions about what Acrisure might want to emulate in Grand Rapids.
The DeVos and Van Andel families have done the following:
- Made their initial billions in the form of a pyramid scheme known as the Amway Corporation.
- Have been the largest campaign contributors to the GOP in Michigan since the 1980s, which has translated to public policies that have been devastating to working class families, BIPOC families and other communities that are exploited under neoliberal capitalism.
- They have used their wealth to imposed their ideological values on the rest of the city, values that have done concrete harm to the LGBTQ community, promoted the privatization of public services, attacked reproductive rights, undermined public education, have subjected all of us to their brand of Christianity, and increased the wealth gap in Grand Rapids.
- Using their wealth to influence City and County officials to design the the downtown in ways that will primarily benefit their interests. Plus, they have done this hiding behind so-called Public/Private partnerships, meaning that they get the public to cough up millions for their pet projects without public consent or public input.
As for Greg Williams, who is CEO and Co-Founder of Acrisure, his current net worth is $56.5 million. Now, that is a meager amount, especially compared to the DeVos and Van Andel families, but Williams no doubt has greater aspirations.
In regards to what it is that Acrisure does, well it’s not entirely clear. Acrisure often refers to themselves as an insurance brokerage. However, the company also states that they offer retirement and cyber services, along with tech-driven financial services. In other words, Acrisure doesn’t produce anything, they only provide services that ultimately rely on market forces and speculative capital.
Greg Williams did sign on to the letter in support of the Grand Rapids Chamber of Commerce ordinance proposal to criminalize the unhoused last December. It would appear that the Acrisure CEO is indeed following the same political and business model as the DeVos and Van Andel families.
3 white dudes with no labor organizing experience talk shit about the UAW strike: Acton Institute podcast and the celebration of greed
When workers organize to fight for a better living, that is when people will often take sides on economic issues.
On Monday, the focus in their weekly podcast, Acton Unwind, the right wing think thank, the Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty, certainly showed us where they stand on the UAW strike.
Their weekly podcast had the headline, Has Organized Labor Overplayed Its Hand? Again? Of course, this was to be expected, since the Acton Institute, founded in the early 1990s by Roman Catholic Priest Fr. Robert Sirico, has always preached that Capitalism and Christianity are perfect bedfellows.
3 White Dudes with no experience with organized labor
I’ll provide a brief analysis of the content of the podcast, but before that I think it is important to mention something about who was on this week’s podcast. The show is produced by Eric Kohn, who is Director of Marketing & Communications at the Acton Institute. Kohn is also often the host of the show. Before coming to the Acton Institute, Kohn was at another right wing think tank, Illinois Policy, which promote Right to Work policies and took a hardline anti-union stance. Kohn was also on the board of Chicago group known as America’s Future. America’s Future was founded in 1995, with the goal of provide future generations an opportunity to learn about and practice Capitalism.
A second guest on the show was Dylan Pahman, who is a research fellow at the Acton Institute. Pahman claimed during the podcast that he always got a better deal as an employee, especially better wages when he worked in the manufacturing sector. However, according to Pahman’s Linkedin profile, he only worked in the manufacturing sector for one company, Medbio, LLC, for only 11 months. It seems that Pahman was stretching his claim about “always” finding a better deal when working in the manufacturing sector.
The other guest on the podcast was Dan Hugger. Hugger is a librarian and research associate at the Acton Institute, along with the author of two books on the pillars of free market Capitalism, specifically Lord Acton.
Talking Points from the 9/18 Acton Unwind podcast
- Someone listed the demands of the UAW, and one demand was read with a sarcastic tone stating that the UAW wanted to have their members paid for 40 hours, but only work 32. Later in the show someone referred to this demand as “ridiculous.”
- Another person made the claim that if the Big 3 auto companies hire more people who are part of the UAW and demanding better wages, that they will be forced hire more temp workers. I think the podcast guys meant to say that the auto companies would chose to hire temp workers, as a way to avoid paying people a livable wage with benefits.
- A third claim was centered on the idea that the Big 3 auto companies needed to remain competitive, which meant a flexible workforce and more automation. If not, then they will repeat what happened in cities like Flint and Detroit. This was a curious and completely false claim, since the fact that Flint and Detroit lost auto manufacturing jobs over the years was always a policy decision by the Big 3 auto companies to find cheaper wages, non-unionized workers and move to state that had Right to Work policies, or countries that provided free trade zones to operate in. Free Trade Zones are essentially gated communities for corporations that had legal protections and were often provided huge economic incentives to relocate.
- At one point the 3 white dudes began to talk about how they loathed public sector unions, even though it had nothing to do with the UAW strike. In addition, they all made the claim that public sector unions were nothing more than private political organizations.
- The 3 white dudes also praised Elon Musk and the Tesla Corporation, but derided UAW retirees.
Not asking the more appropriate questions
So much of how commercial media and pro-Capitalist media is determined by how they frame critical issues of the day, like the current UAW strike. Here are the questions they sought to answer in the 9/18 podcast:
- Are the demands from the UAW reasonable?
- How should we think about trade unionization in America today?
- Are there any risks to the new strategy that the UAW is engaging in?
Now, these questions are not necessarily unreasonable questions, but they always put the onus on workers and never on the corporations. What kind of a discussion do you think would happen if these questions were asked?
- Ford, General Motors and Stellantis made a combined $21 billion in profits in just the first six months of this year. Should those profits we shared with auto workers?
- There are multiple lower wage tiers, such as the workers in parts distribution centers and many of those making components for electric vehicles. Should these tiers be done away with?
- The CEO salaries at the Big 3 auto companies are $29 million for GM’s Mary Barra, $21 million for Ford’s Jim Farley and $24.8 million for Stellantis. Don’t the workers deserve a more equitable wage, considering how much the CEOs make?
It’s clear that the Acton Institute, with their institutionalized bias in favor of Capitalism, would do a podcast that essentially demonized labor unions and autoworkers. We wouldn’t expect anything different, but at the same time we believe it to be important to know where organizations and institutions stand on issues like worker rights, economic justice and the growing wealth gap between the Capitalist Class and the Working Class.
Radical Walking Tour of Grand Rapids document for those who are unable to join us Saturday in person
From the introduction to a Radical Walking Tour of Grand Rapids:
In his insightful book, Lies Across America: What Our Historic Sites Get Wrong. radical historian James Loewen takes us on an enlightening tour of the US and examines historical markers in big cities and small towns to see what lens history is presented in.
Grand Rapids also has many historical markers, especially in the downtown area, most of which have been sanctioned by Grand Rapids City officials or by other entities that are reflective of those who run this city.
An example of numerous historical markers, are the series of statues that have been created over the past two decades, known as the Grand Rapids Community Legends Project. The Community Legends Project was the brainchild Peter Secchia, former US Ambassador to Italy, former CEO of Universal Forrest Products and a member of what I identify as the Grand Rapids Power Structure.
Most of the statues are of people who have historically been part of the local power structure, although there are a few exceptions. What I want to do in this book, is to provide a counter-narrative to what those in power have sanctioned.
The locations that I have chosen follow more of a people’s history of Grand Rapids, whether we are talking about individuals, social movements or historical events that have taken place in the downtown area of Grand Rapids, or at least near downtown Grand Rapids.
I chose this book title, A Radical Walking Tour of Grand Rapids, in part because it could be part of an actual walking tour, indeed even performance art, that deconstructs the dominant narratives about Grand Rapids and allows us to collectively imagine how we might think about Grand Rapids if the stories of social movements and acts of resistance were how we talk about this community.
However, this book will also be an online tour that people can traverse virtually, whether you live in the area or not. There are a total of 34 locations on this radical tour, with a mix of historical markers and historical events. A Radical Walking Tour of Grand Rapids, is also a companion book to my book, A People’s History of Grand Rapids.
My hope is that this book will not only get you to think differently about Grand Rapids, but that it might inspire other radical walking tours throughout the city, where we can share more history from below, instead of the kind of history we are told to believe.
We recognize that spending several hours on a Saturday afternoon participating in a Radical Walking Tour of Grand Rapids, might not be the most appealing thing to do. We do believe that it is important that people become more familiar with the Radical History of Grand Rapids, since it is a fairly rich history that is often suppressed.
We plan to livestream the Radical Walking Tour, post photos, create a YouTube channel of videos for each of the stops along the tour, possibly create an app that people can access and do the tour on their own, plus it might even become another book.
In the meantime, we have put together a PDF of the Radical Walking Tour of Grand Rapids, which you can access at this link. Besides the text/scripts we will be using on Saturday, there are numerous images of either the location of each stop or other graphics that reflect what was happening on the date(s) when these actions happened.
We hope you find this useful and we plan to add many more for a final version of the Radical Walking Tour of Grand Rapids. We are also grateful for everyone who has provided some creative energy, their time, resources and passion for helping to make the Radical Walking Tour of Grand Rapids a reality.
Love & Rage!
Mel Trotter Ministries receives an additional $200,000 for storage bins for the unhoused, which makes them an accomplice in the criminalization of the unhoused
On Tuesday, Grand Rapids City officials approved a resolution that will give Mel Trotter Ministries up to $200,000 to continue their personal storage program. This is according to the Agenda Packet (pages 31 – 33) for the Fiscal Committee meeting for September 19th.
The $200,000 that the City of Grand Rapids is giving to Mel Trotter Ministries for personal items bin storage, will go into effect on October 1, 2023 and continue until September 30th, 2024.
Now, to those who have not been following the issue of how the City of Grand Rapids and faith-based non-profits have been responding to the unhoused, providing storage bins to people might seem like a compassionate response. However, if we look at the totality of why people become unhoused, we can clearly see that entities like Mel Trotter Ministries are in no way interested in eliminating the housing crisis, especially for the unhoused, in Grand Rapids. In fact, as GRIID has written before, we refer to entities like Mel Trotter Ministries as part of the Homelessness Industrial Complex in Grand Rapids.
Mel Trotter Ministries has been around for more than a century and they have always only practiced charity work and in no way are interested in addressing the root causes of the current housing crisis. Like many faith-based groups, particularly Christian groups, they practice a form of White Saviorism, where the often refer to “helping the homeless as helping Jesus, since Jesus can be scene in the homeless.”
Mel Trotter Ministries does not want to address the root causes of the current housing crisis, since that would require them to challenge the market-driven for profit hosing system that put profits over people. This is why Mel Trotter Ministries CEO signed on the letter last December, in support of the Grand Rapids Chamber of Commerce proposed ordinance, which would criminalize the unhoused.
If by chance Mel Trotter Ministries would address the root causes of the current housing crisis, they would also likely lose most of the current funding, especially from the large family foundations. For example, just within the most recent round of 990 document disclosure from numerous local family foundations, there has been……..Here is a list from the most recent 990 foundation document contributions to Mel Trotter Ministries.
- Richard & Helen DeVos Foundation – $25,000
- Dick & Betsy DeVos Foundation – $5000
- Cheri DeVos Foundation – $25,000
- Jerry & Marcia Tubergen – $525,000
- David and Carol Van Andel Foundation – $1,500,000
- Jandernoa Foundation – $187,500
Just with these few local family foundations, all of which are part of the Grand Rapids Power Structure, Mel Trotter Ministries received over $2 Million in one year. If Mel Trotter Ministries suddenly decided to challenge the for-profit driven housing market system or began to advocate that people earn $25 – 30 an hour for their work, then the money from the above foundations would dry up.
Lastly, it is important to note that one of the ordinances adopted by the City of Grand Rapids in late July, has to do with unhoused people who have their possessions with them. Yes, Mel Trotter Ministries has bins for people to store their possession, but not everyone trusts that their possessions will be safe with Mel Trotter Ministries. The ordinance also states that people will not be fined up to 30 days, as long as they reclaim those possessions. Not everyone, especially the unhoused have the means to reclaim said possessions, especially if those possession are not easily accessible.
More importantly, since Mel Trotter Ministries benefits from public funding (through this contract with the City) they have little incentive to see these types of contracts end. In addition, the very fact that Mel Trotter Ministries is a link in the system that criminalizes the unhoused, they are clearly an accomplice to the criminalization of the unhoused. The only way for Mel Trotter Ministries to not be an accomplice in this instance, would be to make it a goal of their to confront the root causes of the housing crisis, with the goal of closing their doors, since if there are no unhoused people, then they would have no reason to exist.
Grand Rapids Institute for Information Democracy 