Skip to content

The criminalization of dissent in Grand Rapids

May 20, 2024

It has been very interesting to see how the City of Grand Rapids, through the use of violence workers (also known as the GRPD), has been responding to organized social movements and acts of public dissent.

Shortly after the May 30th, 2020 uprising in Grand Rapids, the GRPD has been somewhat more tolerant of public dissent, at least in the months that followed. However, this has not been the case with BIPOC organizers and activists, whom have been the primary target of GRPD monitoring, harassment and arrests. 

This same type of repressive and threatening posture from the GRPD was also directed at Movimiento Cosecha and allies in the immigration justice movement even before the COVID pandemic began, specifically in 2019, when the GRPD threatened to arrest people on May Day of 2019 if they marched in the streets. To be clear, Movimiento Cosecha had marched in the streets on May Day in 2017 and 2018, but the GRPD decided they would no longer tolerate disruption of traffic and commerce. Cosecha and their allies obtained FOIA documents that verified that the GRPD was prepared to use force against people marching in the streets. Here is the Dispersal Announcement the GRPD made: 

I am (Rank and Name) of the Grand Rapids Police Department. I am now issuing a Public Safety Order to disperse and I command all those assembled at (specific location) to immediately disperse, which means leave the area. If you do not do so, you may be arrested (cite ordinance or law) or be subject to other police action. Other police action could include the use of Chemical Agents or less-lethal munitions, which may inflict significant pain or result in serious injury. If you remain in the area just described, regardless of your purpose, you will be in violation of city and/or state law. The following routes of dispersal are available: (provide escape route details). You have (provide a reasonable amount of time) minutes to disperse.

The targeting of primarily BIPOC organizers and activists began with actions organized by Defund the GRPD and Justice for Black Lives in the fall of 2020 and throughout 2021.   The City of Grand Rapids then hired Eric Winstrom to be the acting Chief of Police for Grand Rapids. Winstrom came from Chicago, a city which has a long and brutal history of repression by the police. (See the book, Chicago’s Reckoning: Racism, Politics, and the Deep History of Policing in an American City.)

Shortly after Winstrom began his tenure as the head of the GRPD, a cop murdered Patrick Lyoya on April 4th of 2022. The very next day, Chief Winstrom, along with other City leaders, held a Press Conference. What was instructive about that Press Conference is how polished Winstrom was as a PR man.

Two months after Patrick Lyoya was murdered, there was another “officer involved shooting, so Chief Winstrom once again held a Press Conference where he started to use the phrase, “the Ferguson Effect.” Winstrom was using that term to make the claim that whenever there is an “officer involved shooting,” that crime usually goes up, especially crime in the Black community. Of course, Winstrom offered to verification of this claim because when people in positions of power make such claims they must be true, according to the dominant narrative used by the commercial news media.

The phrase “Ferguson Effect”, was coined by Heather MacDonald, which Chief Wonstrom named during the Press Conference. What Winstrom didn’t mention is the fact that Heather MacDonald is a senior fellow at the right-wing Manhattan Institute. The use of the phrase, the “Ferguson Effect” was looked at in an article by the media watchdog group, Fairness in Accuracy & Reporting in June of 2015.  The article states: 

The point of the “Ferguson effect,” though, is not to be accurate. It is instead to distract us from the growing evidence about the magnitude and extent of police use of lethal violence in the United States—as powerfully documented just this week by the Guardian and the Washington Post—and to besmirch the #BlackLivesMatter movement. 

It’s a strategy that Republican presidential candidate Barry Goldwater inaugurated in his campaign in 1964, almost single-handedly turning crime into a political weapon against the civil rights movement.

This is exactly what Chief Winstrom was doing, which the local media seemed to be eating up. WOODTV8 repeated the Ferguson Effect claim in their coverage on Friday.

Since last year, the GRPD is targeting more dissident groups and calling un-permitted marches illegal. When the Comrades Collective joined Palestine Solidarity Grand Rapids for a march that began at MLK Park, then went to Rep. Scholten’s home, the GRPD showed up in big numbers and arrested the safety car driver.  Safety cars have been used in recent years during marches as a means of protecting those marching from motorists that want to ram into people who are in the streets, just like what happened in Charlottesville in 2017.

The same thing happened during the march for Patrick Lyoya, which took places 2 days after the second anniversary of his murder on April 6th. The GRPD arrested the safety car person and then impounded their car.

However, a few weeks after that happened, two BIPOC activists then received calls from the GRPD to turn themselves in, since one was being charged with a misdemeanor and the other a misdemeanor and a felony. 

Just last week, during a protest organized by Palestine Solidarity Grand Rapids, the GRPD once again showed up and arrested 4 people, specifically those that were acting as crowd safety. Here is what the GRCC students newspaper reported:

After protesters marched around the downtown area and disrupted traffic, around 35 Grand Rapids police trailed behind the group stating that they could be subjects of arrest if they didn’t comply with the law. Protestors moved over to the sidewalk while going down Monroe Avenue but marched down the middle of Monroe Center Street.

After Protesters made it back to Monument Park on the corner of Fulton Street and Division Avenue, Police detained four individuals after they were blocking roads according to GRPD Police Chief Eric Winstrom.

“This group has had probably 20 marches since Oct. 6 when Israel was invaded by a group of terrorists,” said Winstrom when referencing when the Palestinian Sunni Islamist group Hamas killed around 1,200 Israeli citizens on Oct. 7. “They (protesters) have not had a permit at any point in time. They continually block streets, creating traffic hazards for individuals. We have been extremely tolerant in accommodating them in their activities, even though they have been illegal…”

It is instructive to note that Winstrom clearly has a Zionist view of what happened in early October, failing miserably to understand the historical context of the actions of Hamas. Winstrom’s lack of clarity on US foreign policy regarding Israel and Palestine aside, what is most important is what he said that is in bold in the previous paragraph. What is at issue here is that Winstrom will not tolerate people engaging in un-permitted marches, especially if those marches are disruptive in nature. 

In Kristian Williams’ book, Life During Wartime: Resisting Counterinsurgency, (a book which discusses the history use of counterinsurgency by police departments – something they learned from the US Military), the author states that one of the primary tactics of counterinsurgency is to engage in “preserving order” and “social management.” 

Alex Vitale, in his book, The End of Policing, confirm’s this function of social control, when he writes:

The reality is that the police exist primarily as a system for managing and even producing inequality by suppressing social movements and tightly managing the behaviors of poor and nonwhite people: those on the losing end of economic and political arrangements.

We should all expect the repression of social movements and organized dissent to increase in Grand Rapids. We need to expect the worst and plan accordingly when we engage in public acts of disruption. Disruption is a long-held tactic of social movements. Dr. King and the Civil Rights Movement used disruption, which he wrote about: 

“We do not need allies more devoted to order than to justice,” Martin Luther King, Jr. wrote in the spring of 1964, refusing calls from moderate Black and White leaders to condemn a planned highway “stall-in” to highlight systemic racism in New York City. “I hear a lot of talk these days about our direct action talk alienating former friends,” he added. “I would rather feel they are bringing to the surface latent prejudices that are already there. If our direct action programs alienate our friends … they never were really our friends.”

It would be understandable, in light of the increased GRPD repression, for people to pull back on direct action. However, we also know that if we are committed to systemic change and collective liberation, we cannot afford to lessen our resistance. We do need to take care of each other and protect those that are the primary targets of this repression, but we must not diminish our resistance, no matter the cost.

I’ll just end with this observation from Kristian Williams’ book, Gang Politics: Revolution, Repression, and Crime, he writes: 

“The challenge for liberatory movements, then, is not merely to launch an insurgency capable of overturning the existing power structure but to create new ways of relating, of organizing, of exercising and sharing power, that do not themselves reproduce the logic of a protection racket, like the police.”

GRIID Interview with Ky: Police repression happens especially when activists want to hold the GRPD accountable

May 20, 2024

I sat down with Ky last Thursday to talk about why the GRPD contacted them two weeks after they participated in a march demanding Justice for Patrick Lyoya, and then charged them with a felony and a misdemeanor.

The march, which took place on April 6th, just two days after the second anniversary of the GRPD murder of Patrick Lyoya. The march was organized by the Comrades Collective, which included several members of Patrick Lyoya’s family. 

There is also a GoFundMe to raise funds for legal support because of these charges. Please contribute if you are able to and share with your circle.

Below are the six questions I asked Ky during the 12:50 interview:

  • Can you tell us what your involvement was during the April 6th Justice for Patrick Lyoya march organized by the Comrades Collective?
  • How many days after the march were you contacted by the GRPD and what were they charging you with?
  • If you weren’t  doing anything different than the dozens of people who participated in the march on April 6th, why do you think the GRPD is targeting you?
  • It’s not lost on many of us that the two people that the GRPD have targeted with charges after the protest are BIPOC. DO you think that the GRPD’s actions are in part racially motivated?
  • Why do you think what happened to you is important for people to know?
  • In what ways can people support you and be involved in the campaign to fight for justice for Patrick Lyoya?

The final State of the City address by Mayor Bliss: What is her real legacy?

May 19, 2024

On Thursday night, Grand Rapids Mayor Rosalynn Bliss delivered her final State of the City speech to a crowd of supporters at an invitation only event in the Fulton Street Farmers Market. You can read the Mayor’s speech here.

I want to provide a counter-narrative to what the Mayor of Grand Rapids had to say and challenge many of her claims she made during her speech. However, I first want to address how the local commercial news reported on the Mayor’s speech.

Stenographers to Power

In his book, Stenographers to Power: Media and Propaganda, David Barsamian interviews several media scholars and practitioners who discuss the issue of how the commercial media in the US tends to act as stenographers for those in power instead of challenging what they say and do. Just recording what people who hold positions of power isn’t enough, journalism should verify their claims and challenge those same claims, especially with counter sources and narratives.

All of the major daily commercial news outlets “reported” on the Mayor’s State of the City speech. I put the word reported in quotes because they primarily acted as stenographer, rather than reporters.

For example, all three TV stations (WOODTV8, WZZM13 and WXMI 17)  covered the event, but all three simply provided a summary of what the Mayor said, and never verified, questioned or challenged what she said. The MLive article also was a form of stenography, just a more refined version reflected in the headline, 4 takeaways from Grand Rapids mayor’s final State of the City address. 

The MLive article is reflective of how local commercial news agencies don’t hold people in power accountable. In the beginning of the MLive story it was all celebratory commentary, which is not surprising, since this was an invitation only event, so naturally the Mayor’s office only invited people who are loyalists. 

However, the article focused on 4 issues – the upcoming Hotel Tax ballot initiative, Addressing homelessness, past and future accomplishments and tree planting. 

Hotel Tax – It should be no surprise that Bliss supports the Hotel Tax, which GRIID has written about.  As I stated in that post: Don’t be fooled by yet another scam to get the public to pay for more of the development projects that are owned and operated by members of the Capitalist Class in Kent County. Let them pay for these projects. They have more than enough money to cover the cost of soccer stadiums, amphitheaters and aquariums. Don’t be fooled by the narrative that they want to provide entertainment opportunities for the public. They want to get the public to pay for their downtown profit-making playground. 

Addressing homelessness (the Mayor’s language) – On this issue the Mayor primarily spoke about public/private partnerships or providing funding to Community Rebuilders. However, the issue of the unhoused, indeed of housing insecurity, is much more complex. More importantly, what Bliss embraces is a false solution to the housing crisis, which is essentially a market-based solution, which will never address the housing crisis, but it does not deal with root causes. For example, look at the proposal from Grand Action 2.0 to build apartment complexes by the Amphitheater and the soccer stadium. The market-based model says, use $318 million in Brownfield Redevelopment Authority money, which is public money, but the apartment buildings will be privately owned. Plus the cost of the apartments in prohibitive to lots of people, as I noted in a recent article.

Past and future accomplishments – under this section, the Mayor is primarily talking about development projects, buildings and neighborhood revitalization, which is many cases has led to gentrification and resident displacement. 

Plant the future – Mayor Bliss ends with the celebration of adding to the tree canopy in Grand Rapids. This has been one positive outcome in recent years, but these sorts of things always come at a cost, which I noted in a post in 2016.

During the Mayor’s Tree Planting event, one saw Peter Secchia being photographed with Grand Rapids Mayor, Rosalyn Bliss. In the photo here, you can see Secchia with the mayor, but what is more interesting is that they are holding Thank You cards expressing gratitude for Rich and Helen DeVos. Why did the city find it necessary to say thank you to the local oligarch’s? 

Secchia did participate in the tree planting event, but more importantly he was engaging if the politics of access. During the last campaign for mayor in Grand Rapids, Secchia, along with several other members of the local power structure (JC Huizenga, Kate Wolters, Scott Brew, Bill Bowling, Robert Woodhouse, Sam Cummings, Doug DeVos, Steve Van Andel, Scott Bowen, Dan Bowen, Sharon Bowen, Mark Breon, Friends of West Michigan Business, Ray Kisor, Mark Murray, Scott Wierda, Thomas Cronkright, Josh May, Lawrence Duthler, Arnold Mikon, Mark Sellers, Realtors Political Action Committee, GR Firefighters Union, GR Police Officers Labor Council all contributed between $500 and $5000 to Bliss’s campaign, according to Campaign Finance records through Kent County

An incomplete record of the oppressive or anti-justice actions by Mayor Bliss since the she first ran for Mayor

This is just a partial list of the ways in which Mayor Bliss has opposed efforts to promote justice, especially efforts that were led by BIPOC organizers. The legacy of Mayor Bliss is fundamentally rooted in servitude to the Grand Rapids Power Structure and in opposition to movements demanding social justice amidst systemic racism in Grand Rapids, the ongoing housing crisis and the lack of accountability with the GRPD.

Palestine Solidarity Information, Analysis, Local Actions and Events for the week of May 19th

May 19, 2024

It has been more than 7 months since the Israeli government began their most recent assault on Gaza and the West Bank. The retaliation for the October 7 Hamas attack in Israel, has escalated to what the international community has called genocide, therefore, GRIID will be providing weekly links to information and analysis that we think can better inform us of what is happening, along with the role that the US government is playing. We will also provide information on local events and actions that people can get involved in. All of this information is to provide people with the capacity of what Noam Chomsky refers to as, intellectual self-defense.

Information  

450,000 Civilians Flee as Israeli Assault on Rafah Enflames Tensions With US 

Israel Continues Unfettered Colonization of the West Bank Amid Genocide in Gaza 

Gaza Solidarity Encampments Interactive Map 

“Resist the Normalization of Evil”: Israeli Reporter Amira Hass on Palestine & the Role of Journalism 

AN ISRAELI COMPANY IS HAWKING ITS SELF-LAUNCHING DRONE SYSTEM TO U.S. POLICE DEPARTMENTS 

THE STATE DEPARTMENT SAYS ISRAEL ISN’T BLOCKING AID. VIDEOS SHOW THE OPPOSITE.

On Gaza, Is Biden Choosing Donors Over Voters? 

Analysis & History  

The Arsenal of Genocide: the U.S. Weapons That Are Destroying Gaza 

‘Are You Going to End the Genocide, President Biden? That’s the Central Question’

“A Racist, Criminal Project”: Palestinian Historian on 1948 Nakba, Israel’s War on Gaza & U.S. Complicity 

Local Events and Actions

Power to Palestine: Weekly Rally in Grand Rapids

Wednesday, May 22 from 12 – 1pm, Monument Park 

Graphic used in this post is from https://visualizingpalestine.org/#visuals 

Monitoring the most powerful family in West MI: Update on the DeVos Family Reader – 2024 edition

May 16, 2024

It has been six months since we last update the DeVos Family Reader. As always, there has been plenty to report on regarding the most powerful family in West Michigan.  

In Howard Zinn’s monumental book, A People’s History of the United States, he constantly juxtaposes the amazing things that people did to fight for liberation and the people behind the systems of oppression that social movements were fighting against. 

This is exactly why I have spent years monitoring, investigating and critiquing the DeVos Family. They are the most recognizable and powerful manifestation of the systems of power and oppression in West Michigan. Now, I know there are plenty of people who share the belief that without the DeVos Family, Grand Rapids wouldn’t be where it is today. I fully agree with that belief, but for reasons that are the exact opposite of those who hold the most powerful family in West Michigan in high regard. 

This updated version of the DeVos Family Reader includes information and analysis on a variety of local issues, even some that are not directly focused on the DeVos Family, but there are connections.

In early February, I posted an article entitled, Buying Elections: 2024 DeVos family campaign contributions to key Kent County elected positions. This article revealed that the DeVos family had already contributed $264,000 for just 4 political candidates running for seats in Kent County. Then in late February, I posted an article about the role that the DeVos family is playing in the new soccer stadium that will be developed in downtown Grand Rapids.

In March, I posted a critique of Doug DeVos’ podcast Believe!, where he interviewed former GRPS Superintendent Teresa Weatherall Neal. Neal was essentially mentored by Betsy DeVos during her tenure at GRPS. Then in late March, GRIID posted a story about the Grand Action 2.0 plan to build apartments by the downtown Amphitheater and the proposed soccer stadium. Grand Action 2.0 is led by Dick DeVos.

Lastly, when the DeVos family decided to close out the Richard & Helen DeVos Foundation, I wrote a 2 part piece regarding local media coverage and what was completely left out of the local media reporting.

The DeVos Family Reader is now up to 750 pages of history, analysis and information about the most powerful family in West Michigan.

Michigan Senator Gary Peters wants to provide Israel with an additional $30 million to strengthen U.S.-Israel Anti-tunneling efforts

May 15, 2024

Last week, Senator Gary Peters introduced bipartisan legislation – the United States-Israel Anti-Tunnel Cooperation Act – with U.S. Senator Ted Budd (R-NC) to strengthen anti-tunneling activity in the Gaza strip. 

According to a recent Press Release:

The legislation authorizes a $30 million increase in funding to expand Department of Defense (DoD) efforts, in collaboration with the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF), to detect, maneuver through, and destroy tunnels constructed by Hamas and other terrorist organizations under the Strip and near the Israeli border. As part of the DoD’s collaboration with the IDF, Israel shares its counter-tunnel technology with the DoD and Department of Homeland Security to combat growing threats at our borders, as well as similar threats faced on the Korean Peninsula and in multiple locations in the Middle East. 

Ok, so let me get this straight. Senator Gary Peters has voted every year he has been a US Senator to provide over $3 billion in US military aid to Israel, plus he voted for the additional $15 billion in “supplemental aid.” Peters, as a member of the Senator Armed Forces Committee, loves using public taxpayer funds to underwrite the arms industry, whether its domestic or foreign. 

Here’s an idea Senator Peters. How about you, Stabenow, Rep. Scholten and the rest of the Democratic Party stop sending more military aid to Israel, call for an immediate ceasefire, end any and all future aid to Israel on the condition that they stop brutalizing Palestinians, that the Israel government stop building settlements on Palestinian lands, that the Israeli government call for an immediate end to their military occupation of Palestine and pay massive reparations for all the harm that has been done to Palestinians since 1948, when Israeli murdered countless Palestinians and displaced some 900,000 from their lands in order to create the State of Israel. 

Now, of course the main Israeli lobby group AIPAC loves the idea from Sen. Peters, based on a recent Press Release of their own. Not surprising that Senator Peters has received $626,444 from Pro-Israel groups since he first ran for a Senate seat in Michigan, according to OpenSecrets.  Republican Senator Ted Budd, who co-sponsored this legislation with Gary Peters, has received a much smaller amount in campaign contributions from Pro-Israel groups ($159,035), but then again Budd only became a Senator in 2023, so his proposed legislation will no doubt pay off big dividends from Pro-Israel groups down the road. 

Lastly, does Senator Peters really believe that providing $30 million additional funds in US military aid to detect and destroy tunnels is a solution that will reduce any animosity that Palestinians might have towards the US? Instead of coming up with new ways to get people from other countries to despise the US, how about putting an end to this shit. Of course Senator Peters won’t, since he, like virtually all members of the US government, are deeply committed to US hegemony and US imperialism. 

Community Solutions to Safety: Know Your Rights Training and SkillShare on May 21st

May 15, 2024

This Know Your Rights SkillShare is at the Grand Rapids Pride Center. From the event description: 

The police have a long history of targeting 2SLGBTQIA+ communities, especially where they intersect with BIPOC and disabled communities. Join us for a workshop to talk about your rights when interacting with the police. We’ll work through scenarios, as well as various options for community safety without police involvement. Presented by the Grand Rapids Institute for Information Democracy and the Grand Rapids Pride Center. Facilitated by Jeff Smith, Ames Carpenter, and Nikita Miner. 

Registration is optional, but helpful for the facilitators, especially if you have accessibility needs or burning questions! We encourage you to register so we have an accurate count for food as well. 

Here is a link to the registration

This SkillShare will be using the lived experiences of the three facilitators, Know Your Rights information from the American Civil Liberties Union and some really good information from the book, Beat the Heat: How to Handle Encounters with Law Enforcement

The Beat the Heat: How to Handle Encounters with Law Enforcement excerpt not only has great advice, but it includes wonderful illustrations for tactics you can use with cops.

 

Picket for Renters Rights in Lansing confronts the MSHDA-hosted conference attendees and their failure to center housing justice

May 14, 2024

On Tuesday, about 75 people held a picket out in front of the Lansing Center, just east of downtown Lansing, where people were attending a conference hosted by the Michigan State Housing Development Authority (MSHDA).

The picket was organized by the Rent is Too Damn High coalition, made up of people from across the state that are part of tenant unions and other housing justice groups. Inside the Lansing Center was a totally different crowd, made up of MSHDA staff members, bankers, non-profit housing groups, developers and other people who believe that the market will fix the housing crisis.  

The morning keynote speaker was a GOP Strategist and the closing keynote speakers were 2 guys who have a show on HGTV. Plus, all of the panel speakers were people who embrace the housing crisis from a market perspective. One of the panelists was Brooke Ossterman the Executive Director of Housing Next, an entity that was created by the GR Chamber of Commerce, which GRIID has previously written about.

I would also like to point out that MISHDA is essentially a mechanism that provides large public subsidies to developers and to non profit housing entities, what I like to call the Non-Profit Industrial Housing Complex, because they only want to provide piece meal housing solutions, but never want to address the root causes of the housing crisis. 

Before the conference happened, MSHDA got wind of the planned picket and sent a letter to the Rent is Too Damn High, trying desperately to present themselves as the “good guy.” The Rent is Too Damn High sent a response that read in part: 

Our choice to demonstrate at the Building Michigan Communities Conference was deliberate. As the leading state agency responsible for housing, MSHDA bears responsibility for housing conditions in the state of Michigan. As you acknowledge, the housing supply shortage remains severe. Most renters also lack any form of rent stabilization, right to renew their contracts, or right to counsel in eviction proceedings. Two million Michiganders with criminal or arrest records are subject to legalized discrimination in housing access, and others are discriminated against for their source of income. All of these factors are driving more renters into homelessness.

The response from the Rent is Too Damn High coalition also stated: 

We understand that you are trying, but for renters on the brink of eviction, it’s not enough. Our demonstration at the conference intends to raise the ambitions and increase the tangible actions of MSHDA, its nonprofit and municipal partners, and the governor. Only with uncommon courage, administrative creativity, and outspoken political leadership will this crisis be solved.

Throughout the four hour picket, some of the people who were attending the conference did come out to offer support or at least were willing to engage in conversation. However, there were also several people who came out to make nasty comments directed at those who were protesting.

The Rent is Too Damn High picket involved lots of chanting and some marching in from of the Lansing Center. There were a few banners and most of the picketers held up signs demanding Social Housing, Renters Rights, Housing First and Rent Control, which also happens to be the four main demands of the statewide coalition.

More importantly were the short speeches and testimonies made by people from across the state. There were people from Washtenaw County, Kalamazoo, Detroit, Lansing and Grand Rapids who spoke about both the urgency of addressing the housing crisis from the perspective of renters and how the housing industry and the government has failed to seriously address the current housing crisis. All of the speakers had great things to say and help get the crowd pumped up during the nearly 4 hours of picketing.

The Rent is Too High coalition also talked about next steps and some upcoming actions for the rest of the year. They made it clear that despite the Democrats having control of the State Legislator they have not embraced housing justice nor the four demands by the coalition.

Lastly, people were encouraged to push for the passage of four pieces of legislation which would certainly benefit tenants and eliminate some barriers for those seeking secure housing.

  • HB 4878 – Fair Housing for Returning Citizens
  • HB 5237 – Tenants’ Right to Counsel
  • SB 205-207; HB 4062-63 – End Source of Income Discrimination
  • SB 801 – Expunge and Seal Eviction Records

We Don’t Want You: Why the housing projects attached to the Amphitheater and the Soccer Stadium will exclude working class and poor people from living in those apartments

May 13, 2024

On Sunday, MLive posted an article entitled, Will housing near new Grand Rapids amphitheater, soccer stadium be affordable? The headline should have read, “None of the 735 new apartments that will be connected to the Amphitheater and Soccer Stadium project will be affordable.”

Reading the MLive article was rather instructive, since it was fundamentally an exercise in the justification of over-priced rental costs that will exclude huge sectors of society who do not make enough money to afford to live next to the Amphitheater or the Soccer Stadium. What follows are some of the justifications.

Justification #1 – “We’re hopeful that we will be able to provide some level of affordability within the project, but we understand the challenges that are being faced,” said Kara Wood, Grand Action 2.0′s executive director. What the Grand Action 2.0 spokesperson is really saying is, “Gee, we would love it if poor people could live here, but it wouldn’t make sense to have poor people live next to these amazing transformational projects. Such projects are really designed to bring more money downtown and primarily benefit the members of Grand Action 20 and our friends.”

Justification #2 – “A huge part of affordability right now is lack of availability,” Bliss said. “So, we know that building housing at any price point will increase supply and increasing supply will reduce costs across the board … and we need housing across the entire spectrum.” Really, so Mayor Bliss thinks that the “market” will just magically provide an adequate amount of housing that is current too expensive for thousands of families in Grand Rapids to afford? In the current NeoLiberal Capitalist market, the plan is always to funnel more public money to projects that are privately owned. Get the public to pay for stuff that the professional class and the Capitalist Class will benefit from.

Justification #3 – “What we’re trying to do is provide a path to getting to an affordable housing agreement,” said Jono Klooster, interim economic development director for the city of Grand Rapids. “It’s kind of a reflection of where we’re at in the development of those projects, and a way to provide options and flexibility as we continue to make progress on these and identify the developers we will be working with.” Sounds like trickle down economics, where these people use warm and fuzzy language about affordability, but rarely practice it, and when they do it is merely token.

What is also instructive about this project is that Grand Action 2.0 wants to get the Grand Rapids Brownfield Redevelopment Authority to provide subsidies to both the apartment buildings for the Amphitheater and the Soccer Stadium. Grand Action 2.0 is asking the City to use the Brownfield Redevelopment Authority to grant $318 million in subsidies – $290 million for the amphitheater housing and $28 million for soccer stadium housing. I mean, why not. The MLive article already says that both Mayor Bliss and 2nd Ward Commissioner Ysasi support such a plan. Not surprising, Commissioner Ysasi sits on the Grand Rapids Brownfield Redevelopment Authority board, along with people who are part of the development industry, former elected officials, but all who are committed to NeoLiberal Capitalism.

Another person who sits on the Grand Rapids Brownfield Redevelopment Authority board is Brooke Oosterman, the executive director of Housing Next, which is an entity created by the Grand Rapids Chamber of Commerce. Considering how viciously the GR Chamber of Commerce was able to get the City of Grand Rapids to adopt ordinances to criminalize the unhoused, it would follow that they don’t want more poor people hanging out in the downtown area. 

Near the end of the MLive article it states: 

Estimated monthly rental rates for the amphitheater housing show an income-restricted, one-bedroom apartment would be $1,888 per-month, according to the city. The same unit at the market rate would be a $126 more at $2,014 per-month. 

A two-bedroom unit in the same building would go for $3,157 per month at the market rate, and $2,267 per-month for an income-restricted unit. There are expected to be nine, two-bedroom income-restricted units in the amphitheater housing tower.

OK, so Grand Action 2.0 and the City of Grand Rapids wants us to provide $318 million in subsidies through the Grand Rapids Brownfield Redevelopment Authority, which is public money. Then they want to limit the number of income restricted apartments, which at the numbers listed above shows that what they mean by income restricted is restricted for those who don’t make a living wage. 

If you are paying $1,888 a month for rent, that equals $22,656 a year. If you are lucking to make $15 an hour, you would make $31,200 a year as a gross salary. Take out taxes and you pretty much are going to afford much after paying rent for an income restricted apartment, except maybe food and a phone, but that’s about it. 

All of this is to say that Grand Action 2.0 and the City of Grand Rapids don’t want poor and working class people to live in this city. On top of that, Grand Action 2.0 is happy to use public money to subsidize these so-called transformational projects, which is really code for – projects that will put more money in the pockets of those who are already disgustingly rich, like members of Grand Action 2.0. 

When will the public wake up to this shit and resist the ongoing plundering that the Capitalist Class does to the rest of us, just so they can have their downtown playground for themselves and their cronies? What we need instead is Social Housing, which is one of the demands of the Rent is Too Damn High coalition in Michigan. 

Rep. Hillary Scholten has the blood of Palestinians on her hands

May 13, 2024

As a first term Representative of the 3rd Congressional District, Hillary Scholten has mad it clear from the beginning her time in Congress that she has a deep commitment to Israel.

In 2023, Rep. Scholten, like most members of Congress, voted for the annual $3.8 Billion in US military aid to Israel. In May, GRIID posted a piece that showed the difference between Rep. Scholten and Rep; Tlaib. Rashida Tlaib re-introduced a resolution calling on Congress to recognize “the ongoing Nakba and Palestinian refugees rights.” Rep. Scholten did not support that resolution, but she did post a message on her Facebook page that said, This week marks Israel’s 75th birthday. Happy Yom Ha’atzmaut! #Israel75.

In late July of 2023, Rep. Scholten signed in to a resolution, which stated:

(1) the State of Israel is not a racist or apartheid state;

(2) Congress rejects all forms of antisemitism and xenophobia; and

(3) the United States will always be a staunch partner and supporter of Israel.

In August of 2023, Rep. Scholten went on an AIPAC-sponsored trip to Israel, which solidified her allegiance to Israel. GRIID posted a piece about that trip, with AIPAC created videos you can find here.

Since the Israeli retaliation for the October 7th attack from Hamas, I have written 17 articles about Rep. Scholten and her unconditional support for Israel and her opposition to those who are opposing genocide. Many of these actions are in violation of International Law, specifically the Genocide Convention and the War Crimes Tribunal. What follows are links to those 17 articles demonstrating that Rep. Hillary Scholten has Palestinian blood on her hands.

Rep. Scholten endorses Israeli War Crimes in Gaza

Rep. Hillary Scholten continues to perpetuate misinformation about Israel/Palestine, along with refusing to acknowledge the decades long Israeli occupation of Palestinian lands 

Despite the growing calls for a ceasefire, Rep. Scholten remains committed to the brutal Israeli assault on Gaza 

Yesterday, I was arrested in Rep. Scholten’s office for demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza 

Rep. Scholten once again demonstrates her allegiance to Israeli propaganda, with the support of so-called Progressive Democrats 

Rep. Scholten says she is working hard to make sure US Imperialism wins the day in Gaza

Rep. Scholten’s statement on the 4 day pause demonstrates her ideological commitment to unconditional US support of Israel

Palestine Solidarity march shows up at Rep. Scholten’s home, resulting in 10 GRPD cruisers sent to harass those demanding a ceasefire and end to US military aid to Israel 

Rep. Hillary Scholten voted for resolution that conflates Anti-Zionism with Antisemitism 

The bullshit response I got from Rep. Scholten in response to our demands calling for an immediate ceasefire and an end to US Military Aid for Israel 

During last night’s phone in town hall meeting with Rep. Scholten, she once again said that she would not support a call for a ceasefire in Gaza 

Rep. Scholten releases a statement that denies Israeli genocide, embraces US militarism, and ignores immigrant justice demands 

Congresswoman Hillary Scholten just voted to for a bill that cements genocide as official US policy

Rep. Scholten engages in performative act in support of Israeli hostages and has yet to condemn the 33,000 plus Palestinians who have been murder by the Israeli military in the past 6 months 

Rep. Hillary Scholten continues to support genocide and she voted to criminalize speech 

It’s bad enough that Rep. Hillary Scholten has consistently voted to fund the Israeli genocide of Palestinians, now she wants to condemn students who are publicly opposing genocide 

Rep. Scholten continues to vote in support of genocide, censorship and to suppress international solidarity