Skip to content

After 6 months of opposing Trump Administration policies where are we now in terms of resistance work?

August 6, 2025

It has been an intense six months since the Trump Administration began with the Executive Order promoting mass deportation on January 20th. Further attacks on public education, medicaid, DEI policies, environmental regulations, trans students, people with disabilities, and people publicly opposing the Israeli genocide happening in Gaza. I say “further attacks”, since under the Obama and Biden Administrations, some of these same attacks were already happening, although to a lesser degree or a lesser known degree.

People have shown up to numerous large rallies throughout the country and in Grand Rapids, whether it was International Women’s Day, the Hands Off rally or the No Kings rally. In Grand Rapids there have been several thousand at each rally. There have also been several other smaller protests, usually weekly at the Tesla dealership on 28th St., at the Social Security office, the Veteran’s facility and various bridge protests, located at overpasses throughout Grand Rapids.

Then there have been several protest actions at the offices of politicians, during Town Hall meetings and when it is know that elected officials will be in public spaces. There are weekly campaigns to call elected  officials to either pressure them or thank them for certain votes, plus there is already efforts to work on getting candidates elected in the 2026 mid-terms. 

Lots of awareness has been happening around what policies the Trump Administration has implemented over the past 6 months. However, little of what has happened has reduced or slowed down the onslaught of what we have all been experiencing since January 20th. Congress continues to adopt repressive policies, often with Bi-partisan support, which includes massive wealth and cost transfers, such as large tax breaks for billionaires, while Medicaid is cut, plus $170 billion that will no go towards immigration enforcement and deportations. 

The Democratic Party has been either silent on some of the harm being implemented by the Trump Administration or has made statements condemning the policies that has increased hardship for millions. Statements do not equal resistance. There have also been some new proposed legislation from Democrats, like the legislation to make ICE agents have ID and not cover their faces, but such proposals do not alter the immigrant family separation and trauma caused by ICE, which the Democrats do not oppose. In addition, since the Democrats do not control Congress, they will propose all sorts of progressive-appearing policies because they know they won’t get passed, but it makes them look like they are listening to the public outrage. This has been a standard practice of the Democrats for decades, but we need to not be fooled by their fake legislative proposals. 

So, over the past 6 months, a great deal of energy has been spent on rallies, marches, sign holding, online petitions, calling politicians, scolding politicians and talking about candidates for the 2026 election. These are the tactics that are the default tactics that people employ, either because it is all they know, because they ideologically think that working within the current political system is the most effective, or because they are unwilling to take risks and engage in more resistance work and Direct Action. 

Resistance that matters

To be clear, I am not saying that people shouldn’t hold rallies, marchers, or hold signs in public, but those things by themselves will never work if we really want to resist systems of power and oppression. 

We really need to develop strategies and tactics that will challenge, confront and potentially dismantle what we are fighting against. However, we can’t just be about resistance work, without developing ways of living in the world that are outside of these systems of power and oppression. For years I have been encouraging people to read Stephen D’Arcy’s essay, Environmentalism as if Winning Mattered: A Self-Organization Strategy. D’Arcy talks about a resistance phase – how we fight against systems of power and oppression, and a transition phase – how we build autonomous communities outside of Capitalism, Colonialism, Fascism and all other isms that brutalize us. 

For those of us who live in this society and carry certain privileges – class, gender, racial, legal status, religious affiliation, etc., we really need to think about the communities of people who are most impacted by the current systems of power and oppression, build relationships with them and engage in resistance work together. The reality is that BIPOC, immigrant, queer, trans, those with disabilities, those subjected to poverty, etc. are being brutalized no matter which political party has power in this country or this state. If you aren’t aware of that reality, then you aren’t paying attention. 

In any sort of social movement or radical politics, we need to participate in disruptive actions, actions that are disruptive to systems of power and oppression. Instead of just holding signs outside of Social Security offices, why not go inside and disrupt their ability to do what they do? Instead of holding signs on highway overpasses, why not occupy the offices of members of Congress….all members of Congress? 

Disrupting systems of power and oppression often means attacking either their ability to make profits, conduct business as usual and perpetuate harm. Capitalism is an insidious economic system that is based on profits and constant growth, but it is also rooted in exploitation and destruction, both of the exploitation of humans and ecosystems. This is why the South African Anti-Apartheid campaign had as one of its strategies a boycott, divestment and sanctions campaign to not support businesses that were profiting off of racial apartheid, robust boycott campaign targeting some of the largest perpetrators of racial apartheid, divesting funds from banks, pension funds, etc, and to call for governments to impose sanctions. This campaign involved a great deal of resistance, and lots of civil disobedience. The current Palestinian BDS campaign is built around the exact same model.

Another form of disruption is when we throw a monkey wrench into systems of power and oppression to conduct business as usual. During the End the Contract campaign that happened in Kent County in 2018-2019, the campaign that sought to get Kent County to end their contract with ICE, those involved in the campaign engaged in all kinds of disruptions. In fact, the kickoff to the campaign in late June of 2018, began with some 200 people showing up to the Kent County Commission meeting and shutting it down. The campaign disrupted numerous county meetings over the next several of months, but it also involved in taking up space in the 4th of July parade, going in to the Kent County Jail and making so much noise that those working the phones had a difficult time hearing callers. After the GRPD called ICE on Jilmar Raos Gomez, the campaign shut down several Grand Rapids City Commission meetings, and on numerous occasions it disrupted traffic. You can read about this campaign here. The County never ended their contact, but ICE did in September of 2019, primarily because of all the bad press and bad PR the campaign had generated!

Lastly, disruptions can mean engaging in actions that reduce harm that is being perpetrated by systems of power and oppression. This can look like what animal liberation groups have done by liberating animals from cages to destroying the machinery of those systems of cruelty. Harm reduction disruptions can also look like Indigenous people blockading fossil fuel corporations from continuing to build oil pipelines. According to a report put out by the Indigenous Environmental Network in 2021, Indigenous-led resistance campaigns against pipelines in the US and Canada have reduced greenhouse gas pollution by at least 25% annually since these campaigns began.

Resistance work in Grand Rapids

Look at the grassroots work of groups like Movimiento Cosecha and GR Rapid Response to ICE. The work of these two groups – which work collaboratively – has been with undocumented immigrants to provide training on what to do if ICE shows up, along with broader solidarity work and political campaigns to get the City of Grand Rapids and Kent County to adopt Sanctuary policies. In addition, Movimiento Cosecha and GR Rapid Response to ICE have been doing direct intervention work to reduce ICE attempts of family separation, using the hotline (616)-238-0081, by providing accompaniment for immigrants and by doing patrols in the Grand Rapids area to monitor ICE activity and directly intervene when possible. 

These groups are being strategic and using tactics that not only reduced the possibility that ICE will separate families, they also provide the necessary community care and Mutual Aid that moves us to relying more on each other than on systems of power and oppression. 

We take care of each other

The immigrant-led group Movimiento Cosecha GR often says, “what we need is already right here in our community.” What Cosecha organizers mean by this statement is not just material needs, but ideas, vision and radical imagination. Radical Imagination – imagining that another world is possible, that we don’t have to settle for what systems of power and oppression give us. As the great Puerto Rican poet, Martin Espada once said, “No change for the good ever happens without it being imagined first, even if that change seems hopeless or impossible in the present.”

Mutual Aid has been a practice in many communities and culture for a very long time. Mutual Aid project are essentially a form of political participation in which people take responsibility for caring for one another and not just through symbolic acts or putting pressure on representative, but by actually building social relationships that are more survivable. Check out this video, which provides a wonderful popular education framework for what Mutual Aid is.

I would also recommend that people read the book, Mutual Aid: Building Solidarity During this crisis (and the next), by Dean Spade. Spade, who is a long time activist/organizer, proposes four criteria for evaluating the success of a mutual aid effort:

  • Does it provide material relief?
  • Does it leave out an especially marginalized part of the affected group (i.e., people with criminal records, people without immigration status?)
  • Does it legitimize or expand a system resistant left movements are trying to dismantle?
  • Does it mobilize people, especially those most directly impacted, for ongoing struggle?

There are several groups that have been involved in Mutual Aid work in Grand Rapids over the years. The Bloom Collective hosted several of the first Really, Really Free Market events around 2007-2008. Really Really Free Markets are where people bring items they no longer need and then people take what they need, which means no one is buying or selling. 

In 2017, GR Rapid Response to ICE started practicing Mutual Aid, by providing material support to immigrants that were impacted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) violence. GR Rapid Response to ICE continues to practice Mutual Aid in the present. There are other groups, like the the West Michigan Care Collective and Grand Rapids Pullover Prevention.  The Grand Rapids Area Mutual Aid Network, which was create at the beginning of COVID in March or 2020, also does amazing work in this community and has provided lots of material aid, including raising several hundred thousand in dollars of Mutual Aid for primarily BIPOC, queer, trans, those with disabilities and immigrant neighbors in the greater Grand Rapids area.

There have also been amazing Mutual Aid Projects that have been created to respond to a particular crisis over the last decade or so. Some inspiring examples are how quickly grassroots mutual aid groups responded to Hurricane Sandy and those that formed with the fires in Los Angeles last year.

Throughout history there have also been fabulous examples of communities practicing Mutual Aid. One of the most overlooked is the Black Panther Party for Self-Defense (BPP). The BPP is inaccurately represented by systems of power and oppression as simply being gun-wielding thugs, but nothing could be farther from the truth. The BPP was part of the lager Black Freedom Struggle and began in 1966 with their Ten-Point Program, which provided a framework for what they wanted. It is true that the BPP engaged in armed self-defense, but they saw that as only one of their Survival Programs. The BPP’s Survival Programs were Mutual Aid Projects and they developed over 60 of them during their short history. People are somewhat familiar with the Children’s Breakfast Program, but most people don’t know that they had their own ambulance service, free commissary for prisoners program, free clinics, their own newspaper and Liberation Schools. Click here to see the entire list.

These kinds of autonomous Mutual Aid Projects need to be explored and practiced if we want to develop real people power. The history of social service programs that make up the larger US government safety net, particularly the programs that began after the Great Depression did not come out of no where. In fact, there were two primary factors that determined much of what we often call the New Deal programs. First, the New Deal programs that provided material support to families deeply impacted by the Great Depression were modeled after the people-created projects that came directly out of those most impacted. (See Dana Franks book, What Can We Learn from the Great Depression?: Stories of Ordinary People & Collective Action in Hard Times) 

Second, the New Deal policies that the FDR Administration put in place was a direct response to the massive public pressure from working class people and organized labor. In the early 1930s there were over 1,000 labor strikes happening on an annual basis across the US (See Jeremy Brecher’s book, Strike!). The US government was forced to create New Deal programs because of the massive resistance to economic conditions that were brought about by the Capitalist Class. If the FDR Administration not passed New Deal policies, the public would have been in open rebellion against the government. And just to be clear, the New Deal policies did not benefit everyone, especially the poorest, Black communities, Mexicans and other groups that were hit the hardest from the Great Depression. 

What I have been attempting to communicate in this article is that if we just want to get rid of Trump then we will continue to perpetuate systems of power and oppression. We have to come to terms with the fact that the current political system, the Neoliberal economic system, which is also driven by US imperialism abroad, a system which is bi-partisan, is the very system that produced the likes of Donald Trump. 

I don’t want to go back to normal. Normal in the US leaves us with mass incarceration, the climate crisis, a housing system that is rooted in profits, police brutalizing Black, Latinx, immigrant and trans people, plus a political system that is antithetical to anything resembling real democracy. The system ain’t working for most of us, so instead of just hoping for mild reforms and lesser of evil politics, why don’t we practice solidarity, mutual aid and fight like hell for collective liberation. 

Deconstructing Memes: When anti-Trump positions still perpetuate Settler Colonialism and Imperialism

August 5, 2025

In this most recent meme, which is the one on the left in the graphic below, you see simple statements that I would classify as a standard Liberal view of the US and the world.

This meme is from Dean Withers, a young white guy who loves to argue with MAGA people, but clearly adopts a Liberal Democratic view of the world. His Facebook page also shows that he is a bit narcissistic, with numerous photos of himself, and videos of him talking to the camera.

More importantly, are the statements in the meme that Withers created. You can see my simply responses on the right, but these responses deserve a bit more context and sourcing, which I believe is important regardless of who makes statements.

Gaza Must Be Freed from Hamas. This statement is deeply problematic for several reasons. First, the Palestinians voted for Hamas, not that I put lots of stock in voting. However, Liberals love voting, so if Palestinians voted for Hamas, then what are they calling for Gaza to be freed from Hamas? More importantly, this statement completely omits the historical fact that Israel has illegally occupied Palestinian land since 1948. The statement also ignores the Israeli system of Apartheid and it completely ignores the current genocidal campaign that Israel is waging against the Palestinians living in Gaza. Lastly, the Withers meme says nothing about the US diplomatic, economic and military support of Israel’s occupation and genocidal campaign.

Israel must be freed from Netanyahu. It is true that Benjamin Netanyahu is a significant problem, but every Israel leader has fundamentally supported the occupation of Palestinian land, the Israeli system of Apartheid and the ongoing military campaigns against the Palestinians. Netanyahu is only the result of the Zionist ideology that drives what the State of Israel has been since 1948. See Ten Myths About Israel, by Ilan Pappe.

Ukraine must be freed from Russia. Just to be clear, I do not support the Russian invasion of Ukraine. However, the US and NATO also have blood on their hands in this matter, plus this meme does not provide significant historical context. See my 2 part piece, US, NATO and the Russian Invasion of the Ukraine: Part II – Historical Context and a broader Geo-Political framework.

America must be freed from Trump. I really hate that people in the US think that we can just use the term America as if it only refers to the United States of America. What about Central America, South America or Latin America. The Americas include the entire continent. Just getting rid of Trump does not remove the political system in the US that is primarily run by members of the Capitalist Class and has been for most of the country’s history. In the first 50 or so years, the US was run by wealthy slave owners. In addition, here is a summary of just a few of the oppressive dynamics under the Biden Administration:

We all need to develop a more critical understanding of the US and its relationship to the rest of the world. We also need to stop posting and sharing stupid memes.

DeVos family always looking to expand their wealth, this time with high end bourbon and whiskey

August 4, 2025

In his most recent Facebook post, Dick DeVos wrote (yes, I monitor these people): 

“CONGRATULATIONS to West Michigan-based CraftCo. and its JOSEPH MAGNUS, FOX & ODEN, and COPPERCRAFT brands for taking home top honors as some of the best bourbons and rye whiskeys in the world!

Joseph Magnus took home Best of Class, multiple Double Golds, and Gold Medals for favorites like its Cigar Blend Bourbon and Murray Hill Club. Fox & Oden was recognized with Platinum, Double Gold, and Silver Medals for its Double Oaked Bourbon and Straight Rye Whiskey. And Coppercraft 9-Year Straight Bourbon earned a silver medal.

These awards are a testament to the exceptional craftsmanship of the CraftCo team. Congratulations to them and their customers!”

This is the latest example of how the DeVos family has continued to not only diversify what they own, but more importantly it demonstrates their ongoing commitment to expand their wealth. The most recent documentation shows that the DeVos family’s wealth stands at $5.4 billion, according to Americans for Tax Fairness.

Now the DeVos family is making money off of high end bourbon and rye whiskey, which at first glance range in price from $72 a bottle to $250 a bottle. Not surprising, the DeVos family is not catering to working class people. In the Facebook post where Dick DeVos is talking about his family’s brands, John Truscott, a longtime Republican operative (he was John Engler’s right hand man) and CEO of Trustcott Rossman, Truscott said, “Joseph Magnus is my go to.”

CraftCo., which is located in Holland, was purchased by the Windquest Group, one of the many DeVos owned corporations. Dick and Betsy DeVos are the primary owners of the Windquest Group, which is made up of the following industries – spirits, hospitality, Sports Performance, Manufacturing and Wellness.

It completely makes sense that Dick DeVos would use his Facebook page to brag about the awards that his alcohol company recently won. Anything to further the ideological and Capitalist agendas is exactly what the DeVos family does. Expanding their wealth means they get to make massive contributions to local, state and elected officials during every election cycle, as I have been documenting for the past 3 decades. Here is an example from 2024

In addition to exposing the DeVos family’s ongoing efforts to undermine and influence public policy, one tactic that we can all engage in is to not assist them in expanding their wealth. We can and must boycott any and all DeVos connected products, which are vast. 

The newly formed Grand Rapids Land Bank Authority does not include people most affected by housing insecurity

August 3, 2025

During last Tuesday City Commission meeting, all six commissioners and Mayor LaGrand approved the appointment of 6 people to the newly formed Grand Rapids Land Bank Authority.

All 6 of these individuals were appointed by Mayor LaGrand, which means that only one person had a say in suggesting people to the newly formed Grand Rapids Land Bank Authority. Here are the 6 people:

  • Mayor LaGrand
  • Eric Brown – Grand Rapids Urban League 
  • Guillermo Cisneros – West Michigan Hispanic Chamber of Commerce 
  • Kurt Reppart – former 1st Ward City Commissioner 
  • Kris Spaulding – owner of Brewery Vivant 
  • Randy Thelen – CEO of the Right Place Inc.

Yes, it is true that the Mayor appointed himself. So, we have a former elected official, someone who manages a non-profit, someone who is the CEO of a Chamber of Commerce, the owner of a brewery and the CEO of the Right Place Inc., which is part of the Grand Rapids Power Structure. The Right Place Inc. has worked to bring companies to the Grand Rapids area, such as 1) their attempt to bring Amazon to the area, which included massive public subsidies , and 2) The Right Place Inc’s role in attracting Israeli military companies to the area, using taxpayer subsidies. On top of that, The Right Place Inc is also a member of the Michigan/Israeli Business Bridge, an entity which develops and encourages trade and business interaction between Michigan-based companies and Israeli companies.

The Board of Directors at the Right Place Inc. is also a who’s who of the Grand Rapids Power Structure, both tier 1 and tier 2. Not surprising, many of these people signed on the letter that supported the GR Chamber of Commerce proposed ordinance that would criminalize the unhoused, a list you can read here.

These appointments fit what we have seen from Mayor LaGrand on the matter of housing so far. Take for example what he said during the State of the City address in March:

We all know that Grand Rapids is no longer a cheap housing market. And that makes sense – housing is cheap in places people don’t want to live, and more expensive when there’s demand.” The Mayor then provided some data about the growing need for housing, the increased cost of housing, while income increases are nowhere near what the housing costs are. 

LaGrand even acknowledges the increase in the number of unhoused people across the country, but then praises what Grand Rapids is doing, citing the 100 in 100 days program, a program that is limited in scope and is ultimately a false solution to the bigger issue of housing insecurity. Central to the issue of the housing crisis is the fact that 47% of Grand Rapidians are one paycheck away from being on the streets or having to live with family/friends. In February, there was a new report on the housing crisis in Kent County, which stated two things that the Mayor did not acknowledge: 

  • Even if rents froze tomorrow, and wages increased at their current rate, it would take until 2036 for people in similarly earning professions to be able to live comfortably and affordably in Kent County, according to the report.
  • If home prices remained at the rate they are now, people in those occupations still wouldn’t be able to afford a home in Kent County until 2041, the report stated.

While those who now make up the Grand Rapids Land Bank Authority may be well intentioned people, but they area also mostly made up of people who are not challenging the fundamental causes of housing insecurity in this city, which is that housing is driven by Capitalism…..meaning housing is NOT a right, it is a commodity.

Equally important is the fact that those who now make up the Grand Rapids Land Bank Authority are not from the very large number of people in Grand Rapids that are experiencing housing insecurity because of the market-driven housing model. 

No matter the issue, Grand Rapids City Officials keep making the same fundamental mistake by bringing together people who are not part of the affected community, the community that would have the most expertise on how to address housing insecurity in Grand Rapids. Don’t expect the Grand Rapids Land Bank Authority members to propose real solutions on how to use the vacant land in Grand Rapids when it comes to housing issues. Until we center those from affected communities and have them directing what we should do, we will only perpetuate the problems and create false solutions.

Graphic used is from the group Deadly Connections https://deadlyconnections.org.au/

Palestine Solidarity Information and Analysis for the week of August 3rd

August 3, 2025

It has been 22 months since the Israeli government began their most recent assault on Gaza and the West Bank. The retaliation for the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack in Israel, has escalated to what the international community has called genocide, therefore, GRIID will be providing weekly links to information and analysis that we think can better inform us of what is happening, along with the role that the US government is playing. All of this information is to provide people with the capacity of what Noam Chomsky refers to as, intellectual self-defense.

Information  

“Our Genocide”: Israeli Human Rights Groups Accuse Israel of Destroying Palestinian Society in Gaza 

Your Guide On How To Support Mutual Aid Groups In Palestine As Humanitarian Crisis Deepens 

The Professors Who Supported the Student Deportation Frenzy 

US Jewish Charities Shouldn’t Be Funding West Bank Settlers 

THE NEW YORK TIMES REPEATED ISRAELI CLAIMS OF HAMAS STEALING AID WITHOUT EVIDENCE

Israel’s Ever-Expanding War Machine Is Financed Through International Bond Sales 

Beyond Gaza’s Shadow: The Unseen War for the West Bank’s Future 

‘A Cruel and Transparent Farce’: Israeli Attacks Kill 62 in Gaza Amid ‘Tactical Pause’ 

A Pro-Israel Nonprofit is Funneling News Content Through Bari Weiss’s “Free Press”

The Genocidal Partnership of Israel and the United States 

Media Largely Ignored Gaza Famine When There Was Time to Avert Mass Starvation 

Analysis & History  

Surviving a Genocide with Eman Aljhaj Ali 

‘People Don’t Want to Be Complicit in War Crimes’ 

EXCLUSIVE: Internal Documents Detail Hamas Proposals That Preceded Trump’s Belligerent Rant 

In Gaza, Hunger Has Overtaken Bombs as Israel’s Cruelest Weapon 

Image used in this post is from https://fair.org/home/media-largely-ignored-gaza-famine-when-there-was-time-to-avert-mass-starvation/ 

WOODTV8 story is full of misinformation and centers Mayor LaGrand over the 2 hours of public comment demanding Sanctuary policies in response to ICE terrorism

July 31, 2025

Late Tuesday evening, after the Grand Rapids City Commission meeting had concluded, WOODTV8 ran a story about that meeting. Unfortunately, their coverage not only distorted what happened, they provided no context for what took place and they did not center the voices of those who organized people to show up that night.

On Tuesday, July 24th, Movimiento Cosecha sent out a Press Release, which not only provided the 6 Sanctuary policies that they and GR Rapid Response to ICE were calling for, the Press Release also provided concrete examples of how the GRPD has cooperated with ICE in recent months. WOODTV8 received a copy of the Press Release, as did the other major commercial news agencies did, both the English and Spanish language news agencies.

On top of the information that the Press Release provided, the organized effort to pressure the City of Grand Rapids to adopt Sanctuary policies had begun in January of this year, which WOODTV8 reported on. The same campaign organized by Movimiento Cosecha and GR Rapid Response to ICE also showed up to a Grand Rapids City Commission meeting in late March to present their demands that the City adopt concrete Sanctuary policies. Then on July 7th, about 25 people went to the home of Mayor LaGrand, as yet another tactic to talk with him and get him to commit to adopting the Sanctuary policies they were demanding. 

So, not only has this been a 6 month campaign that local news has reported on, WOODTV8 also had the Press Release, which clearly laid out the Sanctuary policy demands. Here is the story that WOODTV8 posted on Tuesday night.

The WOODTV8 story is so bad, but let’s take a look at why. First, the story is only 29 seconds long, despite the fact that at least 40 people spoke in favor of the Sanctuary policies that Movimiento Cosecha and GR Rapid Response to ICE were demanding. Second, the story begins with the news reader saying, “The Grand Rapids City Commission had to take a short recess after several anti-ICE demonstrators disrupted the meeting.” This statement framed the 29 second story as people disrupting the City Commission, without provided context. How news stories are framed often determine how the public navigates news stories. Channel 8 decided to make this about demonstrators disrupting a City Commission meeting. 

Third, the first image that viewers of this story would see is of Mayor LaGrand, who is asking security to remove people who are “disrupting” the meeting, which took us to 19 seconds into the story. Fourth, another news reader then tells viewers that people were escorted out by security. Fifth, at 25 second into the story is the first time that the word sanctuary was used, but the news reader said “demonstrators were saying that Grand Rapids needed to be a Sanctuary city.” Sixth, the new reader ended the story by say, “Later the meeting resumed without interruption.”

Was WOODTV8 being lazy with this story? Maybe, but that is not really relevant in the larger context. What is deeply disturbing about this story is that it not only provided misinformation, but it feeds into the narrative that the government wants us to believe, which is that people are being disruptive and it doesn’t matter why.

Sins of Omission

What was completely omitted from the WOODTV8 story:

  • Nothing about the 6 concrete Sanctuary policies that people were demanding.
  • No voices were represented by those who came to the meeting to demand the City adopt Sanctuary policies, especially immigrant voices.
  • No information was shared by WOODTV8, based on the public testimony that was presented during public comment, about the actual harm that ICE is doing, the family separation, the fear and the trauma being experienced by immigrants right here in West Michigan.
  • Security did not “ask people to leave”, the GRPD threatened to arrest people if they didn’t leave.
  • As a popular grassroots social movement, Movimiento Cosecha and GR Rapid Response were using the tactic of disruption, which was central to movements like the Civil Rights Movement, anti-war movements, the labor movement, etc. Not surprising, when news media reported on those movements during those decades, it was almost always in a negative light.

However, the major issue with WOODTV8’s coverage was that it misinformed the public, it presented the public only as disrupters, it didn’t share any of the content from the dozens of public comments about how ICE is doing harm right here in Grand Rapids, and the WOODTV8 coverage essentially normalizes state violence being perpetrated by ICE and the business as usual practices of the Grand Rapids City Commission.

Adaptive Reuse for housing is nothing more than code for developers to get more public funding to make larger profits from housing

July 30, 2025

The GR& Riverfront website, which was created late last year, is a platform for the members of the Grand Rapids Power Structure to showcase updates and information on all of the new commercial developments in downtown Grand Rapids.

In a recent post entitled, Making Room: The Rise of Adaptive Reuse in Grand Rapids Housing, the GR& Riverfront wants us all to think that just because developers are using old buildings, that we should praise them for utilizing these spaces, spaces which have either sat empty or under their current iteration are not generating enough profits. 

Adaptive Reuse is fundamentally a label that commercial developers are using to market yet another profit making housing scheme, which often includes re-directing millions in public dollars to the spaces they are re-purposing. The only thing that commercial developers are re-purposing is public money, public money which will expand their wealth.

The GR& Riverfront post provides several examples of “Adaptive Reuse” buildings: 

  • The former Radisson Hotel Grand Rapids Riverfront on Ann St. NW
  • The Fifth Third Bank Building on Lyon Street
  • The Factory Yards building on Godfrey Avenue

Former Radisson Hotel on Ann St

The GR& Riverfront article writes:

Developer Jack Hoedeman, who is leading the project, summed up the vision with a simple but powerful statement: “Everybody should be able to live on the river.” That vision aligns with the city’s broader goal of bringing more life, equity, and vibrancy to its riverfront corridor.

How sweet, Hoedeman wants to promote equity. Actually, Jack Hoedeman is the former owner of Compass Insurance Agency, which he sold in 2024 for $12 million and is now a partner with Compass Property Development. There are no details about how much public funding the former Radisson Hotel building owners will seek from the state and the City of Grand Rapids, but Compass Property Development has a history of already benefiting from a so-called Public Private partnership. Developers use public money to make more profits, while the public has no say in these matters, along with the fact that thousands of people who make up the public are housing insecure in Grand Rapids.

Former Fifth Third Bank Building

The GR& Riverfront post states: 

In the heart of downtown, another major transformation is underway: the redevelopment of One Eleven Lyon, formerly known as the Fifth Third Bank Building. Originally built in 1967 as the Old Kent Bank headquarters, this 10-story high-rise is undergoing a partial conversion, turning seven upper floors of office space into 140 rental apartments.

According to an article on MLive in late April, CWD Real Estate Investment, which owns the former Fifth Third Bank building, “is requesting a $15.2 million public subsidy for its plan to convert the top seven floors of the structure into 140 apartments.” 

In addition, CWD Real Estate Investment is talking with the Michigan State Housing Development Authority (MSHDA), which usually means they will be seeking state funds as well.

In the above picture, you can see current Mayor David LaGrand (4th from the left), former Mayor Rosalynn Bliss (5th from the left), Sam Cummings (CWD – 3rd from the left), Dan DeVos (CWD- 3rd from the right) and Grand Rapids City Manager Mark Washington (2nd from the right). I reference this picture, because at a Grand Rapids Chamber of Commerce event this past Spring, Sam Cummings talked about a state law that was adopted in 2023, which amended the Brownfield Redevelopment Financing Act. This amendment made housing development projects, like the One Eleven Lyon project eligible for brownfield capture. Cummings made these remarks at the Spring conference held by the GR Chamber of Commerce, which contributed to LaGrand’s campaign for Mayor and subsequence campaigns for State Representative, which is nothing more than influence peddling by people like Cummings, who has a long history of using public funds to expand his wealth.

Factory Yards development project

The GR& Riverfront post states: 

The $150 million development is backed by over $100 million in incentives through Michigan’s Transformational Brownfield Plan, the first Grand Rapids project to qualify when it was announced in October 2023. In addition to the apartments, the development is expected to generate hundreds of jobs and bring long-overdue revitalization to a historically overlooked part of the city.

This acknowledges that public money (incentives) is providing two thirds the cost of the project. The Factory Yards development project will include 467 apartments, with 100 of those apartments being “income-restricted housing units.” Whether or not those 100 units will be truly affordable remains to be seen, but like the other two projects millions in public money will go to private developers who will profit handsomely with these “Adaptive Reuse” buildings. The Factory Yards project is owned by Heritage Development Partners.

The City of Grand Rapids is supporting the project with an Obsolete Property Rehabilitation Act (“OPRA”) tax abatement valued at $10,155,093 over 12 years, as well as the local portion of the property tax capture component of the Brownfield TIF valued at $15,974,912.

Immigrant Justice organizers demand Grand Rapids adopt sanctuary policies, dramatize ICE terrorism and disrupt City Commission meeting

July 30, 2025

Last night members of Movimiento Cosecha, GR Rapid Response to ICE and those who support immigrant justice attended the Grand Rapids City Commission meeting to once again demand that the city adopt sanctuary policies.

The general public comment was moved to the beginning of the meeting, where some 40 people got in line and collectively spoke for nearly two hours about why the city should adopt sanctuary policies. There were a whole range of issues that people presented, some personal, while others addressed the ongoing and increased ICE terrorism that is happening right here in Grand Rapids.

One of the first people to speak laid out the concrete sanctuary policies that they have been pushing since January, when these demands were first presented to the Grand Rapids City Commission. Those policies are:

  • Policies restricting the ability of state and local police to make arrests for federal immigration violations, or to detain individuals on civil immigration warrants. 
  • Policies restricting the police or other city workers from asking about immigration status. 
  • Policies prohibiting “287(g)” agreements through which ICE deputizes local law enforcement officers to enforce federal immigration law. 
  • Policies that prevent local governments from entering into a contract with the federal government to hold immigrants in detention; 
  • Policies preventing immigration detention centers from being established in Grand Rapids. 
  • A policy that will not allow the GRPD to share Flock camera images or any other information gathered by the city of Grand Rapids with ICE or any other law enforcement agency seeking to arrest, detain and deport immigrants.

There was a teacher who talked about how fewer and fewer immigrant students were coming to class because of the fear and trauma that many of them were experiencing. There were some who talked about due process and the legality of what ICE was doing, and there were some that spoke to the moral and ethical demands that were central to the sanctuary demands.

Several people who have been trained by GR Rapid Response to ICE spoke concretely about what they have been witnessing, as they engage in patrols or doing accompaniment with immigrants while they attend appointments required by ICE. Here people shared not just the overall fear and terror that immigrants were experiencing, but how the GRPD has repeatedly cooperated with ICE at both the ISAP office on Michigan and the ICE office at 517 Ottawa NW. 

One person also made the comment that with the Big Beautiful Bill’s passage, ICE and other immigration enforcement agencies will soon be receiving an additional $170 Billion to further terrorize immigrants across this country and in Grand Rapids. 

After nearly two hours of public comment, some of those present staged a little street theater to dramatize what ICE is doing in this community. Two white men, both wearing COVID masks got up and grabbed an immigrant speaker and took her away, since this is a concrete reality that immigrants have to live with. 

Right after the street theater began, people started chanting, ICE and Cops go hand in hand. Many people who had been sitting stood up and did this chant for the next 5 – 7 minutes, despite pleas from Mayor LaGrand that people were disrupting their meeting. Security people attempted to get people to be quiet or leave, and even the City Manager got up and came to the podium that the public had used to request that people stop interrupting the meeting. Eventually, the Mayor requested that members of the GRPD that were present deal with the disruption. Two GRPD officers then told those chanting near the front that if they did not leave they would be arrested. Movimiento Cosecha organizers decided that they had come to do what they want to do and agreed to leave, but everyone continued to chant loudly and slowly walked out of the gym at Gerald R. Ford Academic Center, where the City Commission was being held. 

Near the end of the City Commission meeting, beginning at the 2:09:00 point in the video, you can hear what Grand Rapids Commissioners had to say about the demands to adopt sanctuary policies

Commisioner Ysasi – She referred to the Jilmar Ramos Gomez case in 2018 and said that what happened shouldn’t have happen, but she failed to state that the GRPD’s ICE liaison had called ICE after watching a TV news story about Jilmar, which is why Jilmar was picked up by ICE and detained, despite the fact that he was a former US Marine and citizen of the US. Ysasi also expressed frustration that people didn’t stick around to have a conversation. This was bizarre, because there is no conversation that happens at this meeting, people say what they need to and Commissioner decide to address it at the end or not.

Commissioner Robbins – had nothing to say about the sanctuary policies

Commissioner Knight – she said there were 3 ways of seeing issues and that she needs to see for herself what is happening to immigrants, especially when they come to their ICE appointments. Of course anyone can sit near the ISAP office or the ICE office and watch, but members of GR Rapid Response to ICE have been trained and have been accompanying people since June 4th when there was an ICE raid. Saying she needed to see for herself is fine, but it also felt like she didn’t take about many people were saying as truth, especially from those who were have been witnessing first hand what is happening while they accompany immigrants.

Commissioner Kilgore – He referred to the Foreign Nationals policy, which is woefully inadequate and still allows for GRPD to cooperate with ICE. He also mentioned both federal and state legislative proposals around the issue of ICE agents not self-identifying and covering their faces. Both the federal and state legislation are fairly meaningless proposals, which do nothing to address the fact that ICE is terrorizing immigrants, arresting and detaining them. 

Commisioner Perdue – at one point she suggested that if people want to change things, that they needed to run for office. This tells me that she in unfamiliar with the history of social movements in the US, which is the real change agent, not electoral politics or politicians. She did speak to the issue of a lack of due process and did say she was willing to re-open conversation on sanctuary.

Belchak – She said she wished that people would stay. Apparently she was unaware of the fact that the GRPD threatened to arrest people if they didn’t leave. She also said how lucky we are to live in this country and have free speech??? Then she said that she was hearing people say they felt powerless. I don’t recall people saying they were powerless, rather that they were doing the work of practicing solidarity with immigrants. IShe did say that what ICE is doing is despicable, but didn’t commit to adopting sanctuary policies. 

City Manager Washington – he said that nothing came up in the Public Safety committee about sanctuary, so maybe we need to talk with Winstrom about addressing that in the future. Of course it didn’t come up in the Public Safety committee, since the GRPD dictates what happens in those meetings and they sure as hell don’t want to talk about how they cooperate with ICE. 

Mayor LaGrand had nothing to say!

New 6 month local news study exposes how the local news fails the public

July 29, 2025

In 2025, GRIID conducted a study of four local daily news agencies – MLive, WOODTV8, WZZM13 & WXMI 17 – from January 1st of 2025, through the end of June 2025.

In this 6 month news study, I looked at three critical community issues: 

  • The Grand Rapids Public Schools
  • Climate Change/Environmental Justice 
  • Public Safety/GRPD 

I tracked these three themed news stories from the online portals of each of the four news agencies. All of the hyperlinks to those stories are part of Appendix #1. In addition to monitoring all of these stories, I monitored the sources used in each story, the racial and gender make up of the sources used (only for TV stories) and how the stories were framed. All of this data is included in Appendix #2. 

For the Public Safety/GRPD stories that I monitored, I also tracked images of crime suspects that appeared on the three local TV stations, which I include as part of Appendix #3 

What follows is a breakdown of each of the three critical community issues that I monitored, with some content analysis. 

Monitoring local news media is an important tactic that can help us all think about what kind of information we are receiving. The way stories are reported (or not reported) can influence public opinion, just as the sources that are use and they way local new stories are framed. 

It is true that we live in an information saturated world, but what is different about local news media is that they might be the only sources of information we have access to regarding what is happening in our community. Understanding this fact can help us see the tremendous responsibility local news agencies have to serve what the Federal Communications Commission refers to as, serving the public interest.

In addition, it is important that we not just focus on individual news stories and what they mean. What media analysis have been saying for years is that we need to pay attention to the cumulative effect of coverage around issues like policing, public education, and climate change.

Summary of Findings 

  • The local news media primarily rely on sources from systems of power and privilege – the courts, the GRPD, GRPS administrators, instead of utilizing more community based sources for stories. 
  • Crime coverage dominates local news coverage and takes priority over public education and Climate Change.
  • Local news coverage of the issues monitored in this study, received superficial reporting, with very little investigative reporting, especially around public policy matters.
  • Local TV news often reported on crime using suspect images, which were disproportionately images of BIPOC people, thus perpetuating racist stereotypes. See Appendix #3. 
  • Despite the fact that the first half of 2025 was one of the hottest on record, in the 9 local news stories that deal with extreme heat and extreme weather, only once were the words Climate Change used.
  • A disproportionate amount of crime/community safety coverage also centered around the courts, especially since there was the before, during and after coverage for the trial of former GRPD cop Christopher Schurr, who shot and killed Patrick Lyoya. The total number of crime/community safety stories was 432, with 199 of them related to Patrick Lyoya’s death and the Schurr trial.
  • There were a total of 9 stories that local news reported on the All Acess GRPD TV Show, with no investigation or critique of what that show was designed to communicate to the public.
  • Out of the 433 stories that were about the GRPD, the courts or public safety matters, only once was there a story where the GRPD prevented a crime or violence.

Look at which groups are opposing the ballot initiative that would raise taxes for millionaires and billionaires in Michigan

July 28, 2025

There is a ballot initiative in Michigan called Invest in MI Kids, which is slated to be on the ballot in 2026. The premise of this ballot initiative is to restructure the tax system in Michigan so that millionaires and billionaires will be more in taxes. It’s about time.

In addition, the additional tax revenue that will be generated will be used to fund public schools in Michigan. At the state level, the Michigan Education Justice Coalition is coordinating the campaign, with groups like the Urban Core Collective (UCC) in Grand Rapids acting as a partner in UCC has been doing lots of education justice work in Grand Rapids. 

So, people want to pass a ballot initiative that would appropriately tax millionaires and billionaires, then turn around and use that money to fund public schools. Sounds like a winning combination.

However, not everyone is enthused about the Invest in MI Kids ballot initiative, especially organizations that represent millionaires and billionaires. In late June, the Michigan Chamber of Commerce released a statement against the Invest in MI Kids ballot initiative, claiming the “tax increase would be particularly devastating to smaller businesses.” The Michigan Chamber of Commerce doesn’t really providing any evidence or support for how it would impact smaller businesses. Making this claim is a standard claim from the Chamber of Commerce, so they don’t have to substantiate it, since it is designed to get people to doubt the benefit of taxing millionaires and billionaires.

The Grand Rapids Chamber of Commerce came out with the same position against the Invest in MI Kids ballot initiative in early July, stating that the ballot initiativewould add a 5% income tax on small businesses and individuals earning over $500,000/couples over $1 million, raising the total rate to 9.25%.” Again, they offer to concrete evidence for how the tax increase will hurt small businesses.

Then there is the West Michigan Policy Forum (WMPF), which also came out against the Invest in MI Kids ballot initiative. The recently appointed President of the WMPF, Jase Bolger, wrote an opinion piece in the Detroit News on July 14th, with the headline, State must reject graduated income tax hike proposal. 

Bolger uses the same arguments about opposing increased taxes for the wealthiest residents of Michigan, writing: 

“This isn’t just about a few high earners — it’s about thousands of small-business owners who reinvest in Michigan, hire locally, and are the foundation of our economy. And the workers they support with pay, benefits and future growth.”

Actually, the Invest in MI Kids ballot initiative is about the high earners. In Michigan right now, there are 12 billionaire families, 11 according to this news article, but they forgot to include the DeVos family. Another source says that there are 73,364 households in Michigan with $500,000 or more in income, which makes up only 1.8% of the population. Therefore, if the ballot initiative is passed, then 1.8% of the population – the wealthiest members of Michigan – will pay increased taxes that will generate billions for public schools. 

The West Michigan Policy Forum President was also recently interviewed on the Michael Patrick Shiels podcast, to encourage people not to sign the petition for the Invest in MI Kids ballot initiative.

For those who are unfamiliar with Michael Patrick Shiels, he used to be a radio show producer, but then decided to start a career in talk radio himself in 2005. He is the host of Michigan’s Big Show Starring Michael Patrick Shiels, which is a production of Spotlight Media Marketing and Productions, a pro-business media company. Sheils has written several books on golfing and writes for the Travel Tattler.

In the podcast with WMPF CEO Jase Bolger, Michael Patrick Shiels essentially agrees with Bolger and doesn’t question any of the information that for State Representative share on the graduated income tax ballot proposal. Bolger makes the claim that the Invest in MI Kids ballot initiative would hurt the Michigan economy, but doesn’t really offer any evidence to support such a claim. 

If you support taxing millionaires and billionaires and use that money to support public schools in Michigan, then you can reach out to the Urban Core Collective about being a Justice Captain. Use this form to sign up now and be part of the movement: https://bit.ly/justice-captain-training